Abstract
In current academic systems professors are forced to publish as much as possible because they are evaluated and ranked according to the number of their publications and citations in scientific journals. This “publish or perish”-principle results in the publication of more and more nonsense. This tendency can only be stopped by abolishing the currently pervasive competition for publication. In the past, researchers who had nothing to say were not incentivized to publish but nowadays they also have to publish continually. Non-performance has been replaced by the performance of nonsense. This is worse because it results in an increasing difficulty to find truly interesting research among the mass of irrelevant publications.
A number of perverse incentives are associated with the competition for publication. This includes strategic citing and praising, endless variation of already existing models and theories, and emphasizing formal and mathematical skills, while deemphasizing the content of a paper. Furthermore, in order to maximize the number of publications, scientists also try to squeeze out as many publications as possible from minor ideas (salami tactics), increase the number of co-authors, try to become ever more specialized in already highly specialized scientific disciplines and, in the most extreme case, just fake experiments and results. Engaging in all these activities is basically a waste of time as it does not foster the advancement of science. Instead, it crowds out the intrinsic motivation of professors and other scientists, which is essential for creativity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See Research and development expenditure, by sectors of performance (Eurostat Code: tsc00001).
References
Alberts B (2013) Editorial: impact factor distortions. Science 340:787
Anderson MS, Ronning EA, De Vries R, Martinson BC (2007) The perverse effects of competition on scientists’ work and relationships. Sci Eng Ethics 13:437–461
Atkinson M (2001) “Peer review” culture. Sci Eng Ethics 7(2):193–204
Baethge C (2008) Gemeinsam veröffentlichen oder untergehen. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 105:380–383
Berghoff S et al. (2009) CHE-Hochschulranking. Vorgehensweise und Indikatoren. In: Arbeitspapier Nr. 119. Available via http://www.che.de/downloads/CHE_AP119_Methode_Hochschulranking_2009.pdf
Binswanger M (2010) Sinnlose Wettbewerbe – Warum wir immer mehr Unsinn produzieren. Herder, Freiburg
Binswanger M (2013) More nonsense and less happiness: the unintended effects of artificial competitions. In: Brockmann H, Delhey J (eds) Human happiness and the pursuit of maximization. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 27–40
Staatssekretariat für Bildung und Forschung (2011) Bibliometrische Untersuchung zur Forschung in der Schweiz 1981-2009. Bern
Frey BS (2003) Publishing as prostitution? Choosing between one’s own ideas and academic success. Public Choice 116:205–223
Frey BS, Eichenberger R, Frey RL (2009) Editorial ruminations: publishing Kyklos. Kyklos 62(2):151–160
Fröhlich G (2003) Anonyme Kritik: Peer Review auf dem Prüfstand der Wissenschaftsforschung. Medizin Bibliothek Information 3(2):33–39
Fröhlich G (2006) Evaluation wissenschaftlicher Leistungen: 10 Fragen von Bruno Bauer an Gerhard Fröhlich. Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Strahlenbiologie und Medizinische Physik: SGSMP Bulletin. Available via http://www.sgsmp.ch/bullA62.pdf
Fröhlich G (2007) Peer Review und Abweisungsraten_Prestigeschmuck wissenschaftlicher Journale. Forschung und Lehre 6:338–339
Gassmann O, Minsch R (2009) Die Schweiz im Wettbewerb der Wissensgesellschaft: Was sind die Wirkungen des HFKG? Die Volkswirtschaft 9:30–32, Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO), Bern
Kohler G (2007) Über das Management der Universität. Anmerkung zu einer aktuellen Debatte. Neue Zürcher Zeitung. Available via http://www.nzz.ch/aktuell/feuilleton/uebersicht/ueber-das-management-der-universitaet-1.538892
Körner C (2007) Die Naturwissenschaft im Spannungsfeld zwischen individueller Kreativität und institutionellen Netzen. In: Berka W, Schmidinger W (eds) Vom Nutzen der Wissenschaften. Böhlau, Wien, pp 169–181
Lawrence PA (2003) The politics of publication. Nature 422(6929):259–261
Lisbon European Council (2000) Presidency conclusions. Available via http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1_en.htm
Maasen S, Weingart P (2008) Unternehmerische Universität und neue Wissenschaftskultur. In: Matthies H, Simon D (eds) Wissenschaft unter Beobachtung. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 141–160
Merton RK (1973) The normative structure of science. In: Merton RK (ed) The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Mittelstrass J (2007) Begegnungen mit Exzellenz. Jahreskongress der Schweizerischen Akademie für Naturwissenschaften. Available via https://www.yumpu.com/de/document/view/19550833/konstanz-begegnungen-mit-exzellenz-euler-2007
Mocikat R (2009) Die Diktatur der Zitatenindizes: Folgen für die Wissenskultur. Gaia 2(18):100–103
Münch R (2009a) Entkopplung, Kolonisierung, Zielverschiebung. Wissenschaft unter dem Regime des Exzellenzwettbewerbs zwischen Universitäten. Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Soziologie
Nature (2007). Peer review blog. Available via: http://blogs.nature.com/peer-topeer/2007/09/peer_review_and_scientific_con.html
NZZ (2004) Unruhe auf einem Spitzenplatz. Sonderbeilage zum Forschungsplatz Schweiz. Neue Zürcher Zeitung B3
Osterloh M, Frey BS (2008) Anreize im Wissenschaftssystem. Universität Zürich, Mimeo
Reich ES (2009) Plastic fantastic: how the biggest fraud in physics shook the scientific world, 1st edn. Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Rossner M, Van Epps H, Hill E (2007) Show me the data. J Gen Physiol 131(1):3–4
Schatz G (2001) How can we improve European research? Unpublished manuscript of the inaugural of the president of Switzerland’s science council
Simkin MV, Roychowdhury VP (2005) Stochastic modeling of citation slips. Scientometrics 62(3):367–384
Six A (2008) Schreibkrampf unter Forschern. Neue Zürcher Zeitung am Sonntag, 6 July 2008, p 67
Starbuck WH (2006) The production of knowledge: the challenge of social science research. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Thorpe C (2008) Capitalism, audit, and the demise of the humanistic academy. Workplace 15:103–125
Ware M, Mabe M (2012) An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing. The STM-report, 3rd edn. International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers, The Hague
Wehrli C (2009) Das hohe Gut wissenschaftlicher Redlichkeit. Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 23 Sept 2009
Weingart P (2005) Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? Scientometrics 62(1):117–131
Winiwarter V, Luhmann N (2009) Die Vermessung der Wissenschaft. Gaia 1(18):1
Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316(5827):1036–1039
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Binswanger, M. (2015). How Nonsense Became Excellence: Forcing Professors to Publish. In: Welpe, I., Wollersheim, J., Ringelhan, S., Osterloh, M. (eds) Incentives and Performance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09784-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09785-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)