Advertisement

Fabrication and Characterization of Polymer and Composite Scaffolds Using Freeze-Drying Technique

Chapter
  • 793 Downloads
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Materials book series (BRIEFSMATERIALS)

Abstract

This chapter reports the emulsion freezing/freeze-drying technique for the formation of three dimensional scaffolds. Composite scaffolds based on biodegradable natural polymer and osteoconductive hydroxyapatite (HA) nanoparticles can be promising for a variety of tissue engineering (TE) applications. This study addressed the fabrication of three dimensional (3D) porous composite scaffolds composed of HA and chitosan fabricated via thermally induced phase separation and freeze-drying technique. The scaffolds produced were subsequently characterized in terms of microstructure, porosity, mechanical property. In vitro degradation and in vitro biological evaluation were also investigated. The scaffolds were highly porous and had interconnected pore structures. The pore sizes ranged from several microns to a few hundred microns. The incorporated HA nanoparticles were well mixed and physically co-existed with chitosan in composite scaffold structures. The addition of 10 % (w/w) HA nanoparticles into chitosan enhanced the compressive mechanical properties of composite scaffold compared to pure chitosan scaffold. In vitro degradation results in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) showed slower uptake properties of composite scaffolds. Moreover, the scaffolds showed positive response to mouse fibroblast L929 cells attachment. Overall, the findings suggest that HA/chitosan composite scaffolds could be suitable for TE applications.

Keywords

Composite Scaffolds Chitosan Hydroxyapatite 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Univesiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) for the facilities and support. Authors also acknowledge FRGS Vote: 4F126, GUP (Tier 1) 03H13, Ministry of Higher education (MOHE), RMC and UTM for financial support.

References

  1. Atala, A., & Lanza, R. P. (2002). Methods of tissue engineering. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  2. Chen, V. J., & Ma, P. X. (2005). Scaffolding in tissue engineering. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  3. Gibson, L. J., & Ashby, M. F. (1997). Cellular solids: Structure and properties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Griffith, L. G. N. G. (2002). Tissue engineering-current challenges and expanding opportunities. Science, 295, 1009–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Han, J., Zhou, Z., Yin, R., Yang, D., & Nie, J. (2010). Alginate chitosan/hydroxyapatite polyelectrolyte complex porous scaffolds: Preparation and characterization. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 46, 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hassan, M. I., Mokhtar, M., Sultana, N., & Khan, T. H. (2012). Production of hydroxyapatite (HA) nanoparticle and HA/PCL tissue engineering scaffolds for bone tissue engineering (pp. 239–242). IEEE.Google Scholar
  7. Hollister, S. J. (2005). Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nature Materials, 4, 518–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hsu, Y.-Y., Gresser, J. D., Trantolo, D. J., Lyons, C. M., Gangadharam, P. R., & Wise, D. L. (1997). Effect of polymer foam morphology and density on kinetics of in vitro controlled release of isoniazid from compressed foam matrices. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 35, 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Khan, Y., Yaszemski, M. J., Mikos, A. G., & Laurencin, C. T. (2008). Tissue engineering of bone: Material and matrix considerations. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 90, 36–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lanza, R. P., Langer, R. S., & Vacanti, J. (2007). Principles of tissue engineering. Amsterdam, Boston: Elsevier/Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ma, P. X. (2004). Scaffolds for tissue fabrication. Materials Today, 7, 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Park, J. B., & Bronzino, J. D. (2003). Biomaterials: Principles and applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  13. Ratner, B. D. (2004). Biomaterials science: An introduction to materials in medicine. San Diego, CA, London, UK: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Rinaudo, M. (2006). Chitin and chitosan: Properties and applications. Progress in Polymer Science, 31, 603–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schugens, C., Maquet, V., Grandfils, C., Jerome, R., & Teyssie, P. (1996). Biodegradable and macroporous polylactide implants for cell transplantation: 1. Preparation of macroporous polylactide supports by solid-liquid phase separation. Polymer, 37, 1027–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sultana, N., & Abdul Kadir, R. (2011). Study of in vitro degradation of tissue engineering scaffolds based on biodegradable polymers. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10, 18709–18715.Google Scholar
  17. Sultana, N., & Khan, T. H. (2012). In vitro degradation of PHBV scaffold and HA/PHBV composite scaffolds containing hydroxyapatite nanoparticle for bone tissue engineering. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2012, 1–12.Google Scholar
  18. Sultana, N., & Wang, M. (2008a). Fabrication of HA/PHBV composite scaffolds through the emulsion freezing/freeze-drying process and characterisation of the scaffolds. Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine, 19, 2555–2561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sultana, N., & Wang, M. (2008b). PHBV/PLLA-based composite scaffolds containing nano-sized calcium phosphate particles for bone tissue engineering. Journal of Experimental Nanoscience, 3, 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sultana, N., & Wang, M. (2012). PHBV/PLLA-based composite scaffolds fabricated using an emulsion freezing/freeze-drying technique for bone tissue engineering: Surface modification and in vitro biological evaluation. Biofabrication, 4(1), 015003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sun, T., Khan, T. H., & Sultana, N. (2014). Fabrication and in vitro evaluation of nanosized hydroxyapatite/chitosan-based tissue engineering scaffolds. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2014.Google Scholar
  22. Tong, H.-W., Wang, M., Li, Z.-Y., & Lu, W. W. (2010). Electrospinning, characterization and in vitro biological evaluation of nanocomposite fibers containing carbonated hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. Biomedical Materials, 5, 054111.Google Scholar
  23. Van Vlierberghe, S., Cnudde, V., Masschaele, B., Dubruel, P., De Paepe, I., & Jacobs, P. J. S. (2006). Porous gelatin cryogels as cell delivery tool in tissue engineering. Journal of Controlled Release, 116, e95–e98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vandevord, P. J., Matthew, H. W. T., Desilva, S. P., Mayton, L., Wu, B., & Wooley, P. H. (2002). Evaluation of the biocompatibility of a chitosan scaffold in mice. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 59, 585–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wu, H.-D., Ji, D.-Y., Chang, W.-J., Yang, J.-C., & Lee, S.-Y. (2012). Chitosan-based polyelectrolyte complex scaffolds with antibacterial properties for treating dental bone defects. Materials Science and Engineering C, 32, 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wu, H.-D., Yang, J.-C., Tsai, T., Ji, D.-Y., Chang, W.-J., Chen, C.-C., et al. (2011). Development of a chitosan-polyglutamate based injectable polyelectrolyte complex scaffold. Carbohydrate Polymers, 85, 318–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhou, W., Wang, M., Cheung, W., Guo, B., & Jia, D. (2008). Synthesis of carbonated hydroxyapatite nanospheres through nanoemulsion. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 19, 103–110.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Biosciences and Medical EngineeringUniversiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM)Johor BahruMalaysia

Personalised recommendations