Skip to main content

Using Balance Theory for the Sequential and Correlated Development of Vision, Strategies and Projects in Complex Environments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1829 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

Abstract

This study introduces the usability of Balance Theory for the effective and correlated management of vision, strategies and projects especially in complex environments. Balance Theory was initially developed by Livvarçin (J Turk Navy Navy 77–81, 2010) as a tool for the strategic management of business organizations as well as national organizations or even countries. The theory basically claims that there should be a balance between the interest area of the organization and its power. Any misbalance between those two parameters will cause various types of strategic level problems. When the level of complexity increases, the establishment of clear vision, derivation of strategies and finally development of oriented projects becomes more crucial and more difficult. This study proposes the usage of balance theory for designing vision as the first step. It basically aims to answer the questions; “Where are we now?”, “Where do we want to be?” and finally “How shall we go there?” for the determination of the vision. In the second step; strategies will be developed by assessing the gap between our current and aimed positions. Afterwards, the most appropriate and feasible projects can be initiated. This straightforward process is valid also in complex environments where pursuit of strategies becomes more difficult.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ansoff HI, McDonnell E (1990) Implanting strategic management. Prentice Hall, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakir A (2001) Understanding organizational strategy. Critical management studies conference, UMIST, 11–13 July

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustainable competitive advantage. J Manag 17:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass BM (1990) Bass and Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: theory, research, and managerial applications, 3rd edn. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum JR, Locke EA, Kirkpatrick SA (1998) A longitudinal study of the relation of vision and vision communication to venture growth in entrepreneurial firms. J Appl Psychol 83:43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braybrooke D, Lindblom CE (1963) A strategy of decision. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MD, March JG, Olsen JP (1972) A garbage can model of organizational choice. Adm Sci Q 17:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conger JA, Kanungo RN (1987) Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Acad Manag Rev 12:637–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Feurer R, Chaharbaghi K (1995) Strategy development: past, present and future. Manag Decis 33(6):11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friga PN, Bettis RA, Sullivan RS (2003) Changes in graduate management education and new business school strategies for the 21st Century. Acad Manag Learn Edu 2–3:233–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta YP, Lonial SC (1998) Exploring linkages between manufacturing strategy, business strategy, and organizational strategy. Prod Oper Manag 7(3):243–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry J (1995) Strategy formation and the policy context. J Gen Manag 20(4):54–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantabutra S, Avery GC (2002) Proposed model for investigating relationships between vision components and business unit performance. J Aust N Z Acad Manag 8(2):22–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Livvarçin Ö (2010) Deniz Kuvvetleri Stratejilerinin Sekillenmesinde Denge Kuramı (Using Balance Theory for The Formalization of Turkish Navy Strategies). J Turk Navy 77–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Livvarçin Ö (2012) Uluslararası ilişkilerde GAFA Modeli (Using GAFA model in international relations). J Turk Navy 126–129

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCrimmon KR (1993) Do firm strategies exist? Strateg Manag J 14:103–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles RE, Snow CC, Meyer AD, Coleman HJ (1978) Organizational strategy, structure and process. Acad Manag Rev

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H (1972) Research on strategy-making. Acad Manag Proceedings, 90–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H, Quinn J (1991) The strategy process: concepts, context, cases. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1996) What is strategy. Harvard Business Review, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad CK, Hamel G (1994) Strategy as a field of study: why search for a new paradigm? Strateg Manag J 15:5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins SR, Duncan RB (1988) The role of the CEO and top management in the creation and implementation of strategic vision. In: Hambrick DC (ed) The executive effect: concepts and methods for studying top managers. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Schendel DE, Hofer CW (1979) Strategic management: a new view of business policy and planning. Little, Brown, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey RD (1996) Strategic management and organisational dynamics. Pitman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichy NM, Devanna MA (1986) The transformational leader. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaleznik A (1989) The managerial mystique. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff S (1988) In the age of the smart machine. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ömer Livvarçin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Livvarçin, Ö., Kurt, D. (2015). Using Balance Theory for the Sequential and Correlated Development of Vision, Strategies and Projects in Complex Environments. In: Erçetin, Ş., Banerjee, S. (eds) Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2013. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09710-7_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics