Skip to main content

Operational State Complexity under Parikh Equivalence

  • Conference paper
Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems (DCFS 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8614))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We investigate, under Parikh equivalence, the state complexity of some language operations which preserve regularity. For union, concatenation, Kleene star, complement, intersection, shuffle, and reversal, we obtain a polynomial state complexity over any fixed alphabet, in contrast to the intrinsic exponential state complexity of some of these operations in the classical version. For projection we prove a superpolynomial state complexity, which is lower than the exponential one of the corresponding classical operation. We also prove that for each two deterministic automata A and B it is possible to obtain a deterministic automaton with a polynomial number of states whose accepted language has as Parikh image the intersection of the Parikh images of the languages accepted by A and B. Finally, we prove that for each finite set there exists a small context-free grammar defining a language with the same Parikh image.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aceto, L., Ésik, Z., Ingólfsdóttir, A.: A fully equational proof of Parikh’s theorem. RAIRO-Theor. Inf. Appl. 36(2), 129–153 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Câmpeanu, C., Salomaa, K., Yu, S.: Tight lower bound for the state complexity of shuffle of regular languages. Journal of Automata, Languages and Combinatorics 7(3), 303–310 (2002)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Domaratzki, M., Pighizzini, G., Shallit, J.: Simulating finite automata with context-free grammars. Inform. Process. Lett. 84(6), 339–344 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Esparza, J.: Petri nets, commutative context-free grammars, and basic parallel processes. Fund. Inform. 31(1), 13–25 (1997)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Ginsburg, S., Spanier, E.H.: Bounded ALGOL-like languages. T. Am. Math. Soc. 113, 333–368 (1964)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Ginsburg, S., Spanier, E.H.: Semigroups, Presburger formulas, and languages. Pac. J. Math. 16(2), 285–296 (1966)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldstine, J.: A simplified proof of Parikh’s theorem. Discrete Math 19(3), 235–239 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Hopcroft, J.E., Ullman, J.D.: Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages and Computation. Addison-Wesley (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huynh, D.T.: The complexity of semilinear sets. In: de Bakker, J.W., van Leeuwen, J. (eds.) ICALP 1980. LNCS, vol. 85, pp. 324–337. Springer, Heidelberg (1980)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Jirásková, G., Masopust, T.: On a structural property in the state complexity of projected regular languages. Theor. Comput. Sci. 449, 93–105 (2012)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Lavado, G.J., Pighizzini, G., Seki, S.: Converting nondeterministic automata and context-free grammars into Parikh equivalent one-way and two-way deterministic automata. Inform. Comput. 228, 1–15 (2013)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Parikh, R.J.: On context-free grammars. J. ACM 13(4), 570–581 (1966)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Pighizzini, G., Shallit, J.: Unary language operations, state complexity and jacobsthal’s function. Int. J. Found. Comput. S. 13(1), 145–159 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Shallit, J.O.: A Second Course in Formal Languages and Automata Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. To, A.W.: Model Checking Infinite-State Systems: Generic and Specific Approaches. Ph.D. thesis, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh (August 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Verma, K., Seidl, H., Schwentick, T.: On the complexity of equational Horn clauses. In: Nieuwenhuis, R. (ed.) CADE 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3632, pp. 337–352. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu, S.: State complexity of regular languages. Journal of Automata, Languages and Combinatorics 6, 221–234 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yu, S., Zhuang, Q., Salomaa, K.: The state complexity of some basic operations on regular languages. Theor 125, 315–328 (1994)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lavado, G.J., Pighizzini, G., Seki, S. (2014). Operational State Complexity under Parikh Equivalence. In: Jürgensen, H., Karhumäki, J., Okhotin, A. (eds) Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems. DCFS 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8614. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09704-6_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09704-6_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09703-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09704-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics