Complexity Analysis and Systemic Risk in Finance: Some Methodological Issues

  • Charilaos MertzanisEmail author
Part of the Springer Optimization and Its Applications book series (SOIA, volume 100)


The standard financial analysis has proven unable to provide an adequate understanding and therefore a timely warning of the financial crisis. In order to strengthen financial stability, policy makers are looking for new analytical tools to identify and address sources of systemic risk. Complexity theory and network analysis can make a useful contribution. The financial crisis has highlighted the need to look at the links and interconnections in the financial system. Complexity and network theory which can help identify the extent to which the financial system is resilient to contagion as well as the nature of major triggers and channels of contagion. However, the methodological suitability of the premises of complexity theory for financial systems is still debatable. The use of complexity analysis in finance draws on two distinct but related strands of theory: econophysics and econobiology. Each strand is associated with advantages and drawbacks in explaining the dynamics of financial systems. Properly combined, these theories could form a coherent body of theoretical premises that are capable of approximating reality in financial systems, i.e. explain the “stylized facts”, better than the traditional financial analysis model, which is crucially based on the false conception of a Gaussian distribution of financial returns.


Financial Market Financial System Financial Institution Asset Price Complexity Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Adamu, K., Phelps, S.: Modeling financial time series using grammatical evolution. Working Paper (2009).
  2. 2.
    Adya, M., Collopy, F.: How effective are neural vided fine research assistance. J. Forecast. 17, 481–495 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aleksiejuk, A., Holyst, A.J., Kossinets, G.: Self-organized Criticality in a model of collective bank bankruptcies. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 13, 333 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Allen, F., Morris, S.T., Shin, H.S.: Beauty contests and iterated expectations in asset markets. Rev. Financ. Stud. 19(3), 719–752 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Amaral, L.A.N., Ottino, J.M.: Complex networks: augmenting the framework for the study of complex systems. Eur. Phys. J. B 38, 147–162 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anand, K., Brennan, S., Gai, P., Kapadia, S., Willison, M.: Complexity and crises in financial systems. Paper presented at joint D-FS/DG-P workshop on recent advances in modelling systemic risk using network analysis. ECB, Frankfurt am Main, 5 October 2009Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arthur, B.: Complexity in economic and financial markets. Complexity 1(1), 20–25 (1995)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arthur, B.: Complexity and the economy. Science 284, 107–109 (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arthur, W.B., Holland, J., LeBaron, B., Palmer, R., Taylor, P.: Asset pricing under endogenous expectations in an artificial stock market. In: Arthur, W.B., Durlauf, S., Lane, D.A. (eds.) The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II, Santa Fe Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Westview Press, pp 15–44 (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Atiya, A.F.: Bankruptcy prediction for credit risk using neural networks: a survey and new results. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 12, 929–935 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Axtell, R., Epstein, J.: Growing Artificial Societies from the Bottom Up. Brookings Institution Press, Washington (1996)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Azzini, A., Tettamanzi, A.: A neural evolutionary approach to financial modeling. Proc. Genet. Evol. Comput. Conf. 2, 1605–1612 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bak, P., Paczuski, M., Shubik, M.: Price variations in a stock market with many agents. Physica A 246, 430–440 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bank of International Settlements: a review of financial market events in Autumn 1998. CGFS publication No 12 (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bartolozzi, M., Thomas, A.W.: Stochastic cellular automata model for stock market dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 69, 046112 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bech, M.L., Adelstein, I.: Payments, crunch and easing. Paper presented at Joint D-FS/DG-P workshop on recent advances in modelling systemic risk using network analysis, ECB, Frankfurt am Main, 5 October 2009Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bech, M.L., Beyeler, W., Glass, R.J., Soramäki, K.: Network topology and payment system resilience. Paper presented at Joint D-FS/DG-P workshop on recent advances in modeling systemic risk using network analysis, ECB, Frankfurt am Main, 5 October 2009Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Becher, C., Millard, S., Soramäki, K.: The network topology of CHAPS Sterling. Bank of England Working Paper No 355 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beinhocker, E.D.: The Origin of Wealth–Evolution, Complexity, and the Radical Remaking of Economics. Cambridge MA: Harvard Business School Press (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Borgatti, S.: Centrality and network flow. Soc. Netw. 27, 55–71 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Borland, L.: Long-range memory and non-extensivity in financial markets. Europhys. News 36, 228–231 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bouchaud, J.-F., Potters, M.: More stylized facts of financial markets: leverage effect and downside correlations. Physica A 299, 60–70 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bouchaud, J.-F., Gefen, Y., Potters, M., Wyart, M.: Fluctuations and response in financial markets: the subtle nature of ‘random’ price changes. Quant. Financ. 4, 176–190 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brabazon, A., O’Neill, M.: Biologically Inspired Algorithms for Financial Modeling. Springer, Berlin (2006)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brady, N.: Report of the Presidential Task Force on Market Mechanisms. GPO, Washington (1988)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brock, W.A.: Scaling in economics: a reader’s guide. Ind. Corp. Chang. 8(3), 409–446 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brunnermeier, M.K., Crocket, A., Goodhart, C., Persaud, A.D., Shin, H.: The Fundamental Principles of Financial Regulation. Geneva Reports on the World Economy, 11 (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Caballero, R.J., Simsek, A.: Complexity and financial panics. NBER Working Paper No 14997 (2009)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Castren, O., Kavonius, I.K.: Balance sheet contagion and systemic risk in the euro area financial system: a network approach. ECB Working Paper No 1124 (2009)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chen, W.H., Shih, J.Y.: A study of Taiwan’s issuer credit rating systems using support vector machines. Expert Syst. Appl. 30, 427–435 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cont, R.: Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues. Quant. Financ. 1(2), 223–236 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Coolen, A.C.C.: The Mathematical Theory of Minority Games: Statistical Mechanics of Interacting Agents. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Crutchfield, J.: Is anything ever new? Considering emergence. In: Cowan, G., Pines, D., Meltzer, D. (eds.) Complexity: Metaphors, Models, and Reality. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City (1994)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Delli Gatti, D., Gallegati, M., Greenwald, B., Russo, A., Stiglitz, J.E.: Business fluctuations in a credit-network economy. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 370(1), 68–74 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Derman, E.: Models Behaving Badly: Why Confusing Illusion with Reality Can Lead to Disaster, on Wall Street and in Life. Wiley Finance, London (2011)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Durlauf, S.: Complexity and empirical economics. Econ. J. 115(504), 225–243 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Durlauf, S.: Complexity, economics and public policy. Politics Philos. Econ. 11, 45–75 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Epstein, J.: Generative Social Science. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Espinosa-Vega, M.A., Sole, H.: Cross-border financial surveillance: a network perspective. J. Financ. Econ. Policy 3(3), 182–205 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    European Central Bank: Recent advances in modeling systemic risk using network analysis, January 2010Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fama, E.: Efficient capital market: a review of theory and empirical work. J. Financ. 25(2), 383–417 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gallegati, M., Keen, S., Lux, T., Ormerod, P.: Worrying trends in econophysics. Physica A 370, 1–6 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Georgescu-Roegen, N.: The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gligor, M., Ignat, M.: Econophysics: a new field for statistical physics? Interdiscip. Sci. Rev. 26(3), 183–190 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gromb, D., Vayanos, D.: Limits of arbitrage: the state of the theory. Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ. 2, 251–275 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Haldane, A.: Rethinking the financial network. Speech delivered at the Financial Student Association, Amsterdam, April 2009Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hooker, C.: Asymptotics, reduction, and emergence. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 55, 435–479 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Inaoka, H, Ninomiya, T., Shimizu, T., Takayasu, H., Taniguchi, K.: Fractal network derived from banking transaction - an analysis of network structures formed by financial institutions. Bank of Japan Working Paper No. 04-E-04 (2004)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    International Monetary Fund: Global Financial Stability Report, Chapter II on Assessing the Systemic Implications of Financial Linkages. IMF, Washington (2009)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jevons, W.S.: Investigations in Currency and Finance. Macmillan, London (1884)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Johnson, N.F., Jefferies, P., Pak, M.H., Financial Market Complexity: What Physicists can Tell us About Market Behavior. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Keim, D.B.: Financial market anomalies. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edn., Palgrave Macmillan (2008)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kim, J.: Supervenience, emergence, realization, reduction. In: Loux, M., Zimmerman, D. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics, pp. 556–584. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kiyono, K., Struzik, Z.R., Yamamoto, Y.: Criticality and phase transition in stock-price fluctuations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 068701-1–068701-4 (2006)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Latora, V., Marchiori, M.: The architecture of complex systems. In: Gell-Mann, M., Tsallis, C. (eds.) Nonextensive Entropy-Interdisciplinary Applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lux, T.: The stable Paretian hypothesis and the frequency of large stock returns: an examination of major German stocks. Appl. Financ. Econ. 6(6), 463–475 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Lux, T., Heitger, F.: Micro-simulations of financial markets and the stylized facts. In: Takayasu, H. (ed.) Empirical Science of Financial Fluctuations: The Advent of Econophysics, pp. 123–134. Springer, Berlin (2001)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Lux, T., Marchesi, M.: Scaling and criticality in a stochastic multi-agent model of a financial market. Nature 397, 498–500 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Mandelbrot, B.: The variation of certain speculative prices. J. Bus. 36, 394–419 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Mandelbrot B.: Fractals and Scaling in Finance: Discontinuity, Concentration, Risk. Berlin: Springer (1997)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Mantegna, R.N., Stanley, H.E.: Introduction to Econophysics: Correlations and Complexity in Finance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Markose, S., Giansante, S., Gatkowski, M., Shaghaghi, A.R.: Too interconnected to fail: financial networks of CDS and other credit enhancement obligations of US banks. University of Essex, Discussion Paper No 683 (2010)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Mayr, E.: Populations, Species, and Evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1970)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    McCauley, J.L.: Dynamics of Markets: Econophysics and Finance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Michael, F., Johnson, M.D.: Financial market dynamics. Physica A 320, 525 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Min, S.H., Lee, J., Han, I.: Hybrid genetic algorithms and support vector machines for bankruptcy prediction. Expert Syst. Appl. 31, 652–660 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Mirowski, P.: More Heat Than Light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature’s Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Mitchell, W.C.: Business Cycles. University of California Press, Berkeley (1913)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Mitchell, M.: Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford University Press, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Nelson, R., Winter, S.: An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1982)Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Nelson, R.: Argument, methodology, and fashion: reactions to a paper by Arora and Merges, Industrial and Corporate Change 14(6), 1235–1236 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Newman, M.E.J.: Power laws, Pareto distributions, and Zipf’s law. Contemp. Phys. 46(5), 323–351 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Pareto, V.: Cours d’Economie Politique. Rouge, Lausanne (1897)Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Perona, E.: The confused state of complexity economics: an ontological explanation (2007).
  75. 75.
    Persaud, A.: Sending the herd off the cliff edge: the disturbing interaction between herding and market-sensitive risk management systems. J. Risk Financ. 2(1), 59–65 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Persaud, A.: Liquidity Black Holes: Understanding, Quantifying and Managing Financial Liquidity. Risk Books, London (2003)Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Pisarenko, V., Sornette, D.: New statistic for financial return distributions: power law or exponential? Physica A 366, 387–400 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Plerou, V., Gopikrishnan, P., Gabaix, X., Stanley, H.E.: Quantifying stock-price response to demand fluctuations. Phys. Rev. E 66, 027104 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Ponzi, A., Aizawa, Y.: Evolutionary financial market models. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 287, 507–523 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Prpper, M., van Lelyveld, I., Heijmans, R.: Towards a network description of interbank payment flows. DNB Working Paper No. 177, May 2008Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Puhr, C., Schmitz, S.W.: Structure and stability in payment networks a panel data analysis of ARTIS simulations. In: Leinonen, H. (ed.) Simulation Analyses and Stress Testing of Payment Networks, Multiprint Ltd, Bank of Finland (2009)Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Richardson, K.: Managing complex organizations: complexity thinking and the science and art of management. Corp. Financ. Rev. 13, 23–30 (2008)Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Rickles, D.: Econophysics for philosophers. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 38(4), 948–978 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Rickles, D.: Econophysics and the complexity of financial markets. In: Collier, J., Hooker, C. (eds.) Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Vol.10: Philosophy of Complex Systems. Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam (2010)Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Roehner, B.M.: Patterns of Speculation: A Study in Observational Econophysics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Rosser, J.B. Jr.: Is a Transdisciplinary perspective on economic complexity possible? J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 75(1), 3–11 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Rrdam, K.B., Bech, M.L.: The topology of Danish interbank money flows. FRU Working Paper 2009/01, University of Copenhagen (2009)Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Shleifer, A.: Inefficient Markets: An Introduction to Behavioral Finance. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W.: The limits of arbitrage. J. Financ. 52(1), 35–55 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Simon, H.: A behavioral model of rational choice. Q. J. Econ. 69(1), 99–118 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Simon, H.: The Sciences of the Artificial, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (1981)Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Soramäki, K., Bech, M.L., Arnold, J., Glass, R.J., Beyeler, W.E.: The topology of interbank payment flows. Physica A 379, 317–333 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Sornette, D.: Why Stock Markets Crash: Critical Events in Complex Financial Systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2003)Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Sprott, J.C.: Chaos and Time-Series Analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Stanley, H.E., Afanasyev, V., Amaral, L.A.N., Buldyrev, S.V., Goldberger, A.L., Havlin, S., Leschhorn, H., Maass, P., Mantegna, R.N., Peng, C.K., Prince, P.A., Salinger, M.A., Stanley, M.H.R., Viswanathan, G.M.: Anomalous fluctuations in the dynamics of complex systems: from DNA and physiology to econophysics. Physica A 224, 302–321 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Stanley, M.H.R., Amaral, L.A.N., Buldyrev, S.V., Havlin, S., Leschhorn, H., Maass, P., Salinger, M.A., Stanley, M.H.R., Stanley, H.E.: Can statistical physics contribute to the science of economics? Fractals 4(3), 415–425 (1996)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Stanley, H.E., Amaral, L.A.N., Canning, D., Gopikrishnan, P., Lee, Y., Liu, Y.: Econophysics: can physicists contribute to the science of economics? Physica A 269, 156–169 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Stanley, H.E., Amaral, L.A.N., Gopikrishnan, P., Plerou, V., Rosenow, B.: Quantifying empirical economic fluctuations using the organizing principles of scale invariance and universality. In: Takayasu, H. (ed.) Empirical Science of Financial Fluctuations: The Advent of Econophysics, pp. 3–11. Springer, Berlin (2001)Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Stanley, H.E., Gabaix, X., Gopikrishnan, P., Plerou, V.: Economic fluctuations and statistical physics: the puzzle of large fluctuations. Nonlinear Dyn. 44, 329–340 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Strogatz, S.H.: Norbert Wiener’s brain waves. In: Levin, S. (ed.) Frontiers in Mathematical Biology. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, vol. 100, pp. 122–138. Springer, Berlin (1994)Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Tam, K.Y.: Neural network models and the prediction of bank bankruptcy. Omega 19, 429–445 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Tam, K.Y., Kiang, M.Y.: Managerial applications of neural networks: the case of bank failure predictions. Manag. Sci. 38, 926–947 (1992)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Tay, F.E.H., Cao, L.: Application of support vector machines in financial time series forecasting. Omega 29, 309–317 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Tesfatsion, L., Judd, K.L.: Handbook of Computational Economics, Volume 2: Agent-Based Computational Economics. North-Holland, Amsterdam (2006)Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    The Warwick Commission on International Financial Reform: In Praise of Unlevel Playing Fields, Report, University of Warwick (2010)Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Veblen, T.: Why is Economics not an Evolutionary Science?. Quarterly Journal of Economics 12, 373–397 (1898)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Zeidan, R., Richardson, K.: Complexity theory and the financial crisis: a critical review. Corp. Financ. Rev. 14, 20–32 (2010)Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Zhang, Y.-C.: Evolving models of financial markets. Europhys. News 29(2), 51–54 (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementAmerican University in CairoNew CairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations