Skip to main content

Soft Authoritarianism, Social Diversity and Legal Pluralism: The Case of Singapore

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Sociology of Shari’a: Case Studies from around the World

Part of the book series: Boundaries of Religious Freedom: Regulating Religion in Diverse Societies ((BOREFRRERE,volume 1))

Abstract

Singapore can be described as a sea-port that became a city-state. In the process it has successfully managed religious and ethnic diversity through the use of law to regulate society and to manage religion. Inheriting English common law, Singapore has managed legal pluralism and religious diversity through state agencies, such as MUIS (Islamic Religious Council of Singapore), that seek to modernise the Shari’a, and through the Religious Harmony Act. It has also facilitated Muslim education and family life, strictly controlled religious sites through urban planning, limited aggressive evangelism, rejected ‘shapeless multiculturalism,’ and modestly supported neo-Confucian ‘rule of virtue.’ The chapter explores whether recent political changes will lead to a modification of Singapore’s ‘soft authoritarianism’ and evolution of its policies on diverse religions.

Aspects of this analysis of Singapore first appeared in Nasir, K. M. and B. Turner (2013), Governing as Gardening: Reflections on Soft Authoritarianism in Singapore. Citizenship Studies, 17(3/4), 339–352.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmad, I. (1970). Developments in the marriage laws in Malaysia and Singapore. Malaya Law Review, 2, 257–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, N. A. (2012). The Islamic legal system in Singapore. Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal, 21(1), 163–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. N. D. (1959). Islamic law in the modern world. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, E. (1955). Reflections on the revolution in France. New York: Liberal Arts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, E. (1993). Speech of Edmund Burke Esq., on moving his resolutions for conciliation with the colonies. In I. Harris (Ed.), Burke: Pre-revolutionary writings (pp. 206–269). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. G. (1979). The British in Malaya 1880–1941: The social history of a European community in colonial South-east Asia. Kuala Lumpur/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, W. (2002). Politics in Southeast Asia. London/New York: Routledge Curzon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, K.-S. (1999). Compressed modernity and its discontent: South Korean society in transition. Economy and Society, 28(1), 30–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. M. (2009). Fictions of justice: The International Criminal Court and the challenge of legal pluralism in Sub-Saharan Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, E. (2001). Fundamental principles of the sociology of law. New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnival, J. S. (1948). Colonial policy and practice: A comparative study of Burma and the Netherlands India. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, J. (1986). What is legal pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism, 24, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, F. K., Ibrahim, Z., Chua, M. H., Lim, L., Low, I., Lin, R., & Chan, R. (2011). Lee Kuan Yew: Hard truths to keep Singapore going. Singapore: Straits Times Press Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, M. B. (1975). Legal pluralism: An introduction to colonial and non-colonial laws. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, M. B. (1984). Islamic law in Southeast Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imelda, S. (2011, April 30). GE: MM Lee defends PAP’s record on helping Singaporeans cope with cost of living. Chanelnewsasia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judt, T. (2010). Ill fares the land: A treatise on our present discontents. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamaludeen, M. N., Pereira, A. A., & Turner, B. S. (2009). Muslims in Singapore: Piety, politics and policies. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwa, C. G. (1998). Studying Singapore before Raffles. In S. H. Alatas (Ed.), Malay/Muslim and the history of Singapore (pp. 12–37). Singapore: Centre for Research on Islamic and Malay Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, T., & Steiner, K. (2012). Islam, law and the state in Southeast Asia (Singapore, Vol. II). London: I.B. Taurus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan, H. (1972). Pointing the way 1959–6. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, S. (2006). The political theory of tyranny in Singapore and Burma: Aristotle and the rhetoric of benevolent despotism. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, R. (2004). Lord Cromer: Victorian imperialist, Edwardian Proconsul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peerenboom, R. (Ed.). (2004). Asian discourses of rule of law: Theories and implementation of rule of law in twelve Asian countries, France and the US. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phang, A. B. L. (1990). The development of Singapore law: Historical and socio-legal perspectives. Singapore: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoler, A. L. (1989). Making empire respectable: The politics of race and sexual morality in 20th century colonial cultures. American Ethnologist, 16(4), 634–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. G. (1983). The social world of Batavia: European and Eurasian in Dutch Asia. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thio, L.-A. (2004). Rule of law within a non-liberal ‘communitarian’ democracy: The Singapore experience. In R. Peerenboom (Ed.), Asian discourses of rule of law: Theories and implementation of rule of law in twelve Asian countries, France and the US (pp. 183–224). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trocki, C. A. (2005). Singapore: Wealth, power and the culture of control. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (2 Vols). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White Paper. (1991). Shared values. Singapore: Singapore National Printers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakir, H. (2011, March 8). Malay integration: MM stands corrected. The Straits Times.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan S. Turner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Turner, B.S. (2015). Soft Authoritarianism, Social Diversity and Legal Pluralism: The Case of Singapore. In: Possamai, A., Richardson, J., Turner, B. (eds) The Sociology of Shari’a: Case Studies from around the World. Boundaries of Religious Freedom: Regulating Religion in Diverse Societies, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09605-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics