Skip to main content

Believing to Belong: Non-religious Belief as a Path to Inclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Atheist Identities - Spaces and Social Contexts

Abstract

Explicitly non-religious summer camps for children are a relatively new phenomenon in North America, bringing together a diverse group of people identifying themselves using a variety of terms including, but not limited to, atheists, agnostics, freethinkers, or even brights. After spending a week at Camp Quest Montana I observed that this community felt themselves to be misunderstood by popular and academic representations of atheism. Most striking was the misconception felt by those at Camp Quest that people like themselves who do not believe in gods or religious belief are thought to have a god-shaped hole in their lives where religious belief once existed or should exist. With the utilization of ethnographic methodologies I hope to show that the diverse community brought together by Camp Quest is not one lacking in beliefs, or that believes in nothing. Instead, this paper argues that this pervasive perception regarding non-religious individuals has caused the actual beliefs of this community to become obscured by discourses concerning the logical coherence of atheist texts and statements. This misguided focus has left the individuals at Camp Quest to feel persecuted, misunderstood, and restricted in expressing their beliefs. A better understanding of this small but growing community may provide insights into how non-religious people cannot only recognize their own community but experience feelings of belonging to this community while also revealing pathways towards inclusion that have been overlooked.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a detailed discussion see Campbell (1971, 17).

  2. 2.

    This group includes Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, and Christopher Hitchens.

  3. 3.

    See Gervais et al. (2011); D’Andrea and Sprenger (2007); Ehrlich and Van Tubergen (1971); Harper (2007); Jenks (1986); and Newport (2006).

References

  • Associated Press. 2005. Split rulings on ten commandments displays. NBC News, June 27. http://www.nbcnews.com/id/8375948/ns/us_news/t/split-rulings-ten-commandments- displays/#.UXbmHUoeInh

  • Bullivant, Stephen. 2010. The new atheism and sociology: Why here? Why now? What next? In Religion and the new atheism: A critical appraisal, ed. Amarnath Amarasingam, 109–124. Leiden: Brill.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Camp Quest Inc. 2011. Mission. http://www.campquest.org/mission

  • Campbell, Colin. 1971. Toward a sociology of irreligion. London: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBS News. 2012. 9/11 museum, atheists sue over cross. CBS News, September 11. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57494930/9-11-museum-atheists-spar-over-cross/

  • Cimino, Richard, and Christopher Smith. 2007. Secular humanism and atheism beyond progressive secularism. Sociology of Religion 68(4): 407–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cimino, Richard, and Christopher Smith. 2010. The new atheism and the empowerment of American freethinkers. In Religion and the new atheism: A critical appraisal, ed. Amarnath Amarasingam, 139–158. Leiden: Brill.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cragon, Ryan T., Barry Kosmin, Ariela Keysar, Joseph H. Hammer, and Michael Nielsen. 2012. On the receiving end: Discrimination toward the non-religious in the United States. Journal of Contemporary Religion 27(1): 105–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Andrea, Livia M., and Johann Sprenger. 2007. Atheism and nonspirituality as diversity issues in counselling. Counseling and Values 51: 149–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgell, Penny, Joseph Gerteis, and Douglas Hartman. 2006. Atheists as ‘other’: Moral boundaries and cultural membership in American society. American Sociological Review 71(2): 211–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, Howard J., and G. Norman Van Tubergen. 1971. Exploring the structure and salience of stereotypes. Journal of Social Psychology 83(1): 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eller, Jack David. 2010. What is atheism? In Atheism and secularity: Volume 1: Issues, concepts and definitions, ed. Phil Zuckerman, 1–18. Santa Barbara: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gervais, Will M., Ara Norenzayan, and Azim F. Shariff. 2011. Do you believe in atheists? Distrust is central to anti-atheist prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101(6): 1189–1206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, Marcel. 2007. The stereotyping of nonreligious people by religious students: Contents and subtypes. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 46: 539–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hout, Michael, and Claude S. Fischer. 2002. Why more Americans have no religious preference: Politics and generations. American Sociological Review 67: 165–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, Richard J. 1986. Perceptions of two deviant and two nondeviant groups. The Journal of Social Psychology 126: 783–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Lois. 2012. Research note: Talking about a revolution: Terminology for the new field of non-religion studies. Journal of Contemporary Religion 27(1): 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newport, Frank. 2006. Democrats view religious groups less positively than Republicans. Gallup, September 7. http://www.gallup.com/poll/24385/democrats-view-religious-groups-less-positively-than-republicans.aspx

  • Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. 2012. ‘Nones’ on the rise: One-in-five adults have no religious affiliation. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewforum.org/uploadedFiles/Topics/Religious_Affiliation/Unaffiliated/NonesontheRise-full.pdf

  • SoFree.ca. 2011. CQO history. http://www.sofree.ca/CQOHistory

  • Spradley, James P., and David W. McCurdy. 1988. The cultural experience: Ethnography in complex society. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ysseldyk, Renate, Alexander Haslam, Kimberly Matheson, and Hymie Anisman. 2011. Love thine enemy? Evidence that (ir)religious identification can promote outgroup tolerance under threat. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 15(1): 105–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, Phil. 2012. Contrasting irreligious orientations: Atheism and secularity in the USA and Scandinavia. Approaching Religion 2(1): 8–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Spencer Culham Bullivant .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bullivant, S.C. (2015). Believing to Belong: Non-religious Belief as a Path to Inclusion. In: G. Beaman, L., Tomlins, S. (eds) Atheist Identities - Spaces and Social Contexts. Boundaries of Religious Freedom: Regulating Religion in Diverse Societies, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09602-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics