Skip to main content

Serious Stumbling Blocks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Daniel McAlpine and The Bitter Pit
  • 228 Accesses

Abstract

McAlpine’s experience in the mid 1870s in Huxley’s laboratory dissecting specimens then illustrating and labelling what he found combined with his subsequent study of the literature and a wide range of biological specimens equipped him to make detailed studies of the anatomy of pome fruit. It is evident that prior to committing himself to the bitter pit investigation he began familiarising himself with the anatomy of apples pears (Figs. 10.2, 10.3) and quinces (McAlpine 1912d). As he applied himself to defining the morbid anatomy of bitter pitted fruit, he drew heavily on the information gleaned during 1910 and 1911 (Figs. 11.1 and 11.2). Transverse median section of apples (Fig. 11.1) show the ten vascular bundles positioned around the carpels from which branches radiate out towards the surface of the fruit as well as producing vascular traces supplying the developing seed. Another aspect of the system is demonstrated in the longitudinal median sections and the exposed vascular system left by the dissolution of the flesh (Fig. 11.2). It was through these examinations that he saw that the initiation of the pits was death of parenchyma cells surrounding vein endings. This confirmed other findings and supported propositions about the cause of bitter pit. It also provided Professor Ewart with a basis to accuse him of plagiarism!

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Graham, Hon. G (1912) Letter written [10-12-‘12] to Minister Tudor proposing a meeting to consider problems surrounding the publication of McAlpine’s First Progress Report and [unstated] problems between Norris, Cherry and McAlpine

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk TW (1913) Kirk, Director of Orchards, Department of Agriculture, Industry and Commerce, New Zealand wrote [21-1-‘13] to Dr. Cameron thanking him for the copy of The First Progress Report on Bitter Pit

    Google Scholar 

  • Laidlaw W (1913) Letter written [27-3-‘13] to Dr. Norris requesting 350 copies of McAlpine’s First Progress Report

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine D (1911a) The fibro-vascular system of the apple (pome) and its functions. Proc Linn Soc NSW 36:613–625, 4 Plates, 21 Figures

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine D (1911b) The fibro-vascular system of the pear (pome). Proc Linn Soc NSW 36:656–663, 3 Plates

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine D (1912a) Letter written to Hon. Geo. Graham [c.11-‘12] informing him of the spurious criticism from Dr. Norris and Cherry instigated by Professor Ewart

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine D (1912b) Letter written to Hon. Geo. Graham [4-12-‘12] objecting to Norris’s requiring monthly reports on the grounds that it was not required in his contract and that the information contained was forwarded to Professor Ewart

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine D (1912c) Letter written to Hon. Geo. Graham [9-12-‘12] informing him that Dr. Norris was acting outside his brief by interfering in administrative arrangements by changing arrangements already made by McAlpine for chemical analyses to be made at the Federal Chemistry Laboratories

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine D (1912d) The fibro-vascular system of the quince compared with that of the apple and pear (Pome). Proc Linn Soc NSW 37:689–697

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine D (1913) Letter written [4-3-‘13] to Hon. G. Graham MLA drawing attention to the delay in distributing the First Progress Report which he sent to the Department of Customs on 1st July 1912, not withstanding the Statement by the Federal Treasurer in his Budget Speech on 3rd August, “That the report be printed at once and made available.” He had checked with the Government Printer who had told him all 2,500 copies had been printed and bound

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris WP (1912a) Letter [24-9-12] written to W. Laidlaw, and other members of the Advisory Committee, with copies of the First Progress Report and foreshadowing a date for the first Advisory Committee meeting

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris WP (1912b) Letter [17-10-12] written to members of the Advisory Committee advising date time, and venue of the first Advisory Committee meeting

    Google Scholar 

  • Tudor, Hon. FG (1912) Letter written to Hon. G. Graham [12-12-‘12] blaming McAlpine for the confusion over the printing of his First Progress Report and backing Dr. Norris authority to handle administration of the investigation

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Parbery, D.G. (2015). Serious Stumbling Blocks. In: Daniel McAlpine and The Bitter Pit. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09552-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics