The Next Generation of Knowledge Management: Mapping-Based Assessment Models

  • Giovanni SchiumaEmail author
  • Daniela Carlucci
Part of the Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning book series (IAKM, volume 1)


After three decades of conceptualisations and investigations, the field of Knowledge Management (KM) can be now considered mature. Concepts such as knowledge, strategic knowledge management, knowledge processes and criteria for assessing knowledge and intellectual capital within organisations are well established and acknowledged. However, despite the large amount of studies dedicated to the subject, which have been accompanied by the development of specialised and focused international research outlets such as, in particular, Knowledge Management Research and Practice (KMRP), Journal of Knowledge Management (JKM) and Journal of Intellectual Capital (JIC), the discipline and practice of knowledge management seems yet not fully integrated into the fabric of organisations. This means that the knowledge management practices are not part of everyday managerial and operational practices. There could be different reason explaining why this is the case. One of the key reasons is the lack of research and practical approaches as well as tools supporting managers to fully disclose and assess the value and benefits of KM. Therefore, it is our perspective that the next generation of KM has to focus the attention on the development of assessment models and particularly on the development of mapping-based methodologies and tools to explain and disentangle how KM drive value creation for organisations. In this light this chapter provides a contribution to the definition of new KM models specifically aimed to a better understanding of KM outcomes and value. Based on some previous works of the authors, the chapter analyses how to elicit the mechanisms of conversion of knowledge resources into value through the use of visual techniques and presents an AHP based mapping model that allows to identify the knowledge asset value drivers on which management attention should be focused as well as to highlight and assess the network of relationships between and among knowledge assets, and between knowledge assets and organisational performance.


  1. Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Strategic assets and organisational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biktimirov, E. N., & Nilson, L. B. (2006). Show them the money: Using mind mapping in the introductory finance course. Journal of Financial Education, 32, 72–86.Google Scholar
  3. Boisot, M. (1998). Knowledge assets: Securing competitive advantage in the information economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision, 36, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buzan, T. (1995). The MindMap. London: BBC books.Google Scholar
  6. Carlucci, D., & Schiuma, G. (2005). Knowledge asset value spiral. Knowledge and Process Management Journal, 13(1), 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlucci, D., & Schiuma, G. (2007a). Knowledge asset value creation map – Assessing knowledge asset value drivers using AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(3), 814–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlucci, D., & Schiuma, G. (2007b). Exploring intellectual capital concept in strategic management research. In L. Joia (Ed.), Strategies for information technology and intellectual capital: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 10–28). London: Idea Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlucci, D., & Schiuma, G. (2009). Applying the analytic network process to disclose knowledge assets value creation dynamics. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 7687–7694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carlucci, D., Marr, B., & Schiuma, G. (2004). The knowledge value chain: How intellectual capital impacts business performance. International Journal of Technology Management, 27(6–7), 575–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carmeli, A., & Tishler, A. (2004). The relationships between intangible organisational elements and organisational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 25(13), 1257–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daley, B. J. (2004). Using concept maps in qualitative research. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Concept Mapping, Pamplona. Available from
  13. Daum, J. H. (2002). Intangible assets and value creation. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. De Brucker, K., Alain Verbeke, A., & Macharis, C. (2004). The applicability of multicriteria-analysis to the evaluation of intelligent transport systems (ITS). Research in Transportation Economics, 8, 151–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eppler, M. J. (2006). A comparison between concept maps, mind maps, conceptual diagrams, and visual metaphors as complementary tools for knowledge construction and sharing. Information Visualization, 5(3), 202–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fathian, M., Sotoudehriazi, M., Akhavan, P., & AliAmin, M. (2008). How to assess knowledge management: Developing a quantitative model. International Journal of Electronic Business Management, 6(1), 10–20.Google Scholar
  18. Fischer, H. M., & Pollock, T. G. (2004). Effects of social capital and power on surviving transformational change: The case of initial public offering. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 463–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Forman, E. H., & Gass, S. I. (2001). The analytic hierarchy process: An exposition. Operations Research, 49, 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal [Special Issue], 17, 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hsu, L.-C., & Wang, C.-H. (2012). Clarifying the effect of intellectual capital on performance: The mediating role of dynamic capability. British Journal of Management, 23(2), 179–205.Google Scholar
  22. Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Vaidyanath, D. (2002). Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 28(3), 413–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 14336–14345.Google Scholar
  24. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2000). Having trouble with your strategy? Then map it. Harvard Business Review, 78(5), 167–176.Google Scholar
  25. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy maps – Converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  26. Larkin, J. H. (1989). Display based problem solving. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 319–341). Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lev, B., & Daum, J. H. (2004). The dominance of intangible assets: Consequences for enterprise management and corporate reporting. Measuring Business Excellence – The Journal of Business Performance Management, 8(1), 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liebowitz, J. (2005). Developing metrics for determining knowledge management success: A fuzzy logic approach. Information Systems, VI(2), 36–42.Google Scholar
  29. Lippman, S. A., & Rumelt, R. P. (1982). Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2), 418–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lönnqvist, A., Sillanpää, V., & Carlucci, D. (2009). Intellectual capital management in practice: Assessment of implementation and outcomes. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 7(4), 308–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martin, J. W. (2004). Demonstrating knowledge value: A broader perspective on metrics. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(1), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mendes, P. (2011). Demand driven supply chain. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Neely, A., Adams, C., & Kennerley, M. (2002). The performance prism: The scorecard for measuring and managing business success. London: Financial Times Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  34. Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69, 96–104.Google Scholar
  35. Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  36. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79–91.Google Scholar
  37. Qureshi, M. E., & Harrison, S. R. (2006). Comparing Riparian revegetation policy options using the analytic hierarchy process. In G. Herath & T. Prato (Eds.), Using multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: Empirical applications. Aldershot/Burlington: Ashgate Pub.Google Scholar
  38. Roos, J., Roos, G., Dragonetti, N. C., & Edvinsson, L. (1997). Intellectual capital: Navigating the new business landscape. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. Roos, G., Pike, S., & Fernström, L. (2005). Managing intellectual capital in practice. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  40. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  41. Saaty, T. L. (1994). Fundamentals of multiple criteria decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Pittsburgh: RSW Publications.Google Scholar
  42. Saaty, T. L. (2008). Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network process. Review of the Royal Spanish Academy of Sciences, Series A, Mathematics, 102(2), 251–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y. (1996). External cognition: How do graphical representations work? International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 45, 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schiuma, G. (2009). The managerial foundations of knowledge assets dynamics. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 7, 290–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schiuma, G., Lerro, A., & Carlucci, D. (2005). An interfirm perspective on intellectual capital. In B. Marr (Ed.), Perspectives in intellectual capital. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  46. Schiuma, G., Ordonez De Pablos, P., & Spender, J. C. (2007). Intellectual capital and company’s value creation dynamics. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 4(4), 331–341.Google Scholar
  47. Schoemaker, P. J., & Waid, C. C. (1982). An experimental comparison of different approaches to determining weights in additive value models. Management Science, 28, 182–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The new organizational wealth: Managing and measuring knowledge-based assets. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  49. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. The Psychological Review, 55(4), 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vekiri, I. (2002). What is the value of graphical displays in learning? Educational Psychology Review, 14(3), 261–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wiig, K. M. (1993). Knowledge management foundations: Thinking about thinking – How people and organizations create, represent, and use knowledge. Arlington: Schema Press.Google Scholar
  53. Wiig, K. M. (1997). Knowledge management: Where did it come from and where will it go? Expert Systems with Applications, 13(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wood, D. (1992). The power of maps. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  55. Yu, P. L., & Chen, Y. C. (2005). Empowering analytic hierarchy process by habitual domain concepts. In Proceedings of the 8th ISAHP, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.Google Scholar
  56. Zack, M. H. (1999). Developing a knowledge strategy. California Management Review, 41(3), 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zahedi, F. (1986). The analytic hierarchy process. A survey of the method and its applications. Interfaces, 16, 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Innovation Insights HubUniversity of the Arts LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Center for Value Management, DICEMUniversity of BasilicataPotenzaItaly

Personalised recommendations