Skip to main content

Understanding and Improving the Professional Toolbox: Communities of Practice as a Paradigmatic Lesson for Knowledge Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Knowledge Management

Part of the book series: Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning ((IAKM,volume 1))

  • 2374 Accesses

Abstract

CoPs have a special place in the KM toolbox, and have attracted an increasing interest of scholars and practitioners for many years. The chapter illustrates the origins and evolution of the notion, the variety of its practical applications, and the place it has in KM. Particularly, it aims: (a) to describe how the notion of CoP has changed over time and there is no unambiguous nor agreed definition; (b) to show how this has led to a proliferation of different organisational configurations that are tagged as CoPs; (c) to discuss how this is also an opportunity for setting a new agenda for KM, both in theoretical and practical terms; and (d) to illustrate how the case of CoPs provides useful lessons for KM: in particular, researchers and practitioners should reflect on how the lack of consistency and robustness of concepts and notions can hinder the progress of KM as both a scientific discipline and a professional practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, E. C., & Freeman, C. (2000). Communities of practice: Bridging technology and knowledge assessment. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(1), 38–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A., & Joshi, K. D. (2011). A review of community of practice in organizations: Key findings and emerging themes. In Proceedings of the 44th HICSS, Kauai, 4–7 Jan 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A., & Roberts, J. (2008). Knowing in action: Beyond communities of practice. Research Policy, 37(2), 353–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, N. (2006). A classification of communities of practice. In E. Coakes & S. Clarke (Eds.), Encyclopedia of communities of practice in information and knowledge management (pp. 21–29). Hershey: Idea Group.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practices. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardichvili, A., Maurer, M., Li, W., Wentling, T., & Stuedemann, R. (2006). Cultural influences on knowledge sharing through online communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(1), 94–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolisani, E., & Damiani, F. (2010). Knowledge management in complex environments: The UN peacekeeping. Measuring Business Excellence, 14(4), 76–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolisani, E., & Scarso, E. (2014). The place of communities of practice in knowledge management studies: A critical review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(2), 366–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolisani, E., Scarso, E., & Di Biagi, M. (2006). Economic issues of online professional communities. In S. Clarke & E. Coakes (Eds.), Encyclopedia of communities of practice in information and knowledge management (pp. 148–156). Hershey: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bolisani, E., Gambarotto, F., & Scarso, E. (2011). Communities of practice: Comparing experiences from private companies and public organisations. In F. Lehner, K. Bredl (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Knowledge Management, Academic Conferences Limited, Reading, pp. 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourhis, A., Dubé, L., & Jacob, R. (2005). The success of virtual communities of practice: The leadership factor. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(1), 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, A. (2004). Shell’s communities of practice – 12 years of experiences. EBK – Knowledge Sharing Across Boundaries, London, 24 Jun 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, A. Y. K. (2006). The rise and fall of a community of practice: A descriptive case study. Knowledge and Process Management, 13(2), 120–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coakes, E., & Clarke, S. (2006). The concept of communities of practice. In E. Coakes & S. Clarke (Eds.), Encyclopedia of communities of practices in information and knowledge management (pp. 92–97). Hershey: Idea Group.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cothrel, J., & Williams, R. L. (1999). On-line communities: Helping them form and grow. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(1), 54–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A. (2005). What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works. Journal of Information Science, 31(6), 527–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. G., Subrahmanian, E., & Westemberg, A. W. (2005). The “global” and the “local” in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(1), 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewhurst, F. W., & Cegarra Navarro, J. G. (2004). External communities of practice and relational capital. The Learning Organization, 11(4/5), 322–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duguid, P. (2008). Prologue: Community of practice: Then and now. In A. Ash & J. Roberts (Eds.), Community, economic creativity, and organization (pp. 1–10). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fahey, R., Vasconcelos, A. C., & Ellis, D. (2007). The impact of rewards within communities of practice: A study of the SAP online global community. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 5(3), 186–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franz, M., Freudenthaler, K., Kameny, M., & Schoen, S. (2002). The development of the Siemens Knowledge Community Support. In T. H. Davenport & G. J. B. Probst (Eds.), Knowledge management case book (pp. 147–159). Berlin: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garavan, T. N., Carbery, R., & Murphy, E. (2007). Managing intentionally created communities of practice for knowledge sourcing across organisational boundaries. The Learning Organization, 14(1), 34–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafeez, K., & Alghatas, F. (2007). Knowledge management in a virtual community of practice using discourse analysis. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handzic, M., & Lagumdzija, A. (2010). Global faculty learning community: A case study. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 8(1), 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T. (1999). What’s your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Business Review, 77(2), 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J.-F., Cohendet, P., Simon, L., & Dubois, L.-E. (2013). Another cog in the machine: Designing communities of practice in professional bureaucracies. European Management Journal, 31(1), 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heron, J. (1996). Co-operative inquiry: Research into the human condition. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth, P., Kimble, C., & Wright, P. (2000). Communities of practice in the distributed international environment. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(1), 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huysman, M., & Wulf, V. (2006). IT to support the knowledge sharing in communities, towards a social capital analysis. Journal of Information Technology, 21(1), 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakabadse, N. D., Kakabadse, A., & Kouzmin, A. (2003). Reviewing the knowledge management literature: Towards a taxonomy. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(4), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimble, C., & Hildreth, P. (2005). Dualities, distributed communities and knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(4), 102–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimble, C., Hildreth, P., & Bourdon, I. (2009). Communities of practice: Creating learning environments for educators (Vols. 1–2). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lesser, E. L., & Storck, J. (2001). Communities of practice and organizational performance. IBM Systems Journal, 40(4), 831–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L. C., Grimshaw, J. M., Nielsen, C., Judd, M., Coyte, P. C., & Graham, I. D. (2009a). Evolution of Wenger’s concept of community of practice. Implementation Science 4(11).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, L. C., Grimshaw, J. M., Nielsen, C., Judd, M., Coyte, P. C., & Graham, I. D. (2009b). Use of communities of practice in business and health care sectors: A systematic review. Implementation Science 4(12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maracine V., Maries I., Bolisani E., Scarlat E., & Nica A. S. (2012). The role of knowledge dynamics in developing a medical community of practice. In Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Knowledge Management, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, 6–7 Sept 2012, pp. 665–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murillo, E. (2011). Communities of practice in the business and organization studies literature. Information Research 16(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, S., Bresnen, M., Edelman, L., Scarbrough, H., & Swan, J. (2006). Sharing knowledge across projects. Limits to ICT-led project review practice. Management Learning, 37(2), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paik, Y., & Choi, D. Y. (2005). The shortcomings of a standardized global knowledge management system: The case study of Accenture. Academy of Management Executive, 19(2), 81–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Montoro, M., & Martínez, J. (2011). Communities of practice in public administration: The case of Catalonia’s Government. In O. R. Hernáez & E. B. Campos (Eds.), Handbook of research on communities of practice for organizational management and networking: Methodologies for competitive advantage (pp. 421–442). Hershey: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Onge, H., & Wallace, D. (2003). Leveraging communities of practice for strategic advantage. Burlington: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarso, E., Bolisani, E., & Salvador, L. (2009). A systematic framework for analysing the critical success factors of communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(6), 431–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarso, E., Bolisani, E., & Padova, A. (2010). Achieving effective knowledge sharing by bridging knowledge islands: Lessons from Ernst & Young case. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference The Knowledge-Based Organization: Economic, Social and Administrative Approaches to the Knowledge-Based Organization, Subiu, 25–27 Nov, pp. 597–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2013a). The intellectual core and impact of the knowledge management academic discipline. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(1), 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2013b). Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: 2013 update. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(2), 307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharratt, M., & Usoro, A. (2003). Understanding knowledge-sharing in online communities of practice. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(1), 187–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. A., & McKeen, J. D. (2003). Creating and facilitating communities of practice. In C. W. Holsapple (Ed.), Handbook on knowledge management (Vol. 1, pp. 393–407). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, N. M., Wilensky, H. N., & Redmiles, D. F. (2012). Doing business with theory: Communities of practice in knowledge management. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 21(2–3), 111–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usoro, A., Sharratt, M. W., Tsui, E., & Shekhar, S. (2007). Trust as an antecedent to knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 5(3), 199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, E. (2000). Communities of practice: The structure of knowledge stewarding. In C. Despres & D. Chauvel (Eds.), The present and the promise of knowledge management (pp. 205–224). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, C., & Ribière, V. (2013). 10 years of KM theory and practices. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 11(1), 4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1996). Communities of practice: The social fabric of a learning organization. Healthcare Forum Journal, 39(4), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2004). Knowledge management as a doughnut: Shaping your knowledge strategy through communities of practice. Ivey Business Journal Online, January/February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: The career of a concept. In C. Blackmore (Ed.), Social learning systems and communities of practice (pp. 179–198). London: The Open University, Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., & Snyder, W. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practices. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ettore Bolisani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bolisani, E., Scarso, E. (2015). Understanding and Improving the Professional Toolbox: Communities of Practice as a Paradigmatic Lesson for Knowledge Management. In: Bolisani, E., Handzic, M. (eds) Advances in Knowledge Management. Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09501-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics