Advertisement

On the Experimental Intradiscal Pressure Measurement Techniques: A Review

  • A. AraújoEmail author
  • N. Peixinho
  • A. Pinho
  • J.C.P. Claro
Conference paper
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 24)

Abstract

The intradiscal pressure has been essential for prevent the spinal complaints by forming a basis for clinical advice to promote the correct sitting postures. As a consequence, it is evident the need of an accurate method for measure the intradiscal pressure, to better understand the disc response to hydrostatic pressure fluctuations. Numerous reviews regarding disc mechanics are available, including intradiscal pressure benchmarks; however, an analysis on the techniques of intradiscal pressure measurement is needed. Therefore, this review will remain focused on the methodologies adopted for measure the intradiscal pressure in several conditions: for different daily activities, under external loads and for values where occurs annulus fibrosus disruption. The importance of the intradiscal pressure on disc function will be discussed as well as the some guidelines for design new measurement techniques will be defined.

Keywords

Intervertebral disc Intradiscal pressure 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the project “NP Mimetic—Biomimetic Nano-Fibre Based Nucleus Pulposus Regeneration for the Treatment off Degenerative Disc Disease”, financed by the European Commission under FP7 (grant NMP-2009-SMALL-3-CP-FP 246351).

References

  1. 1.
    Adams MA, Dolan P, Mcnally DS (2009) The internal mechanical functioning of intervertebral discs and articular cartilage, and its relevance to matrix biology. Stress Int J Biol Stress 28:384–389Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Campana S, Charpail E, de Guise JA, Rillardon L, Skalli W, Mitton D (2011) Relationships between viscoelastic properties of lumbar intervertebral disc and degeneration grade assessed by MRI. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 4(4):593–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Claus A, Hides J, Moseley GL, Hodges P (2008) Sitting versus standing: does the intradiscal pressure cause disc degeneration or low back pain? J Electromyogr Kinesiol 18(4):550–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cripton PA, Dumas GA, Nolte LP (2001) A minimally disruptive technique for measuring intervertebral disc pressure in vitro: application to the cervical spine. J Biomech 34(4):545–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dennison CR, Wild PM, Byrnes PWG et al (2008) Ex vivo measurement of lumbar intervertebral disc pressure using fibre-Bragg gratings. J Biomech 41(1):221–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ellingson AM, Nuckley DJ (2012) Intervertebral disc viscoelastic parameters and residual mechanics spatially quantified using a hybrid confined/in situ indentation method. J Biomech 45(3):491–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hattori S, Oda H, Kawai SU-S (1981) Cervical intradiscal pressure in movements and traction of the cervical spine. Z Orthop 19:568–569Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heuer F, Schmitt H, Schmidt H, Claes L, Wilke H-J (2007) Creep associated changes in intervertebral disc bulging obtained with a laser scanning device. Clin Biomech 22(7):737–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Menkowitz M, Stieber JR, Wenokor C, Cohen JD, Donald GD, Cresanti-Dakinis C (2005) Intradiscal pressure monitoring in the cervical spine. Pain Physician 8(2):163–166Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nachemson A, Elfström G (1970) Intravital dynamic pressure measurements in lumbar discs. A study of common movements, maneuvers and exercises. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl 1:1–40Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nachemson A (1965) The effect of forward leaning on lumbar intradiscal pressure. Acta Orthop Scand 35:314–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nachemson A (1963) The influence of spinal movements on the lumbar intradiscal pressure and on the tensile stresses in the annulus fibrosus. Acta Orthop Scand 33:183–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nerurkar NL, Elliott DM, Mauck RL (2010) Mechanical design criteria for intervertebral disc tissue engineering. J Biomech 43:1017–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Niosi CA, Oxland TR (2004) Degenerative mechanics of the lumbar spine. Spine J 4(6 Suppl):202S–208SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Okushima H (1970) Study on hydrodynamic pressure of lumbar intervertebral disc. Nihon Geka Hokan 39(1):45–57Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pospiech J, Stolke D, Wilke HJ, Claes LE (1999) Intradiscal pressure recordings in the cervical spine. Neurosurgery 44(2):379–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sato K, Kikuchi S, Yonezawa T (1999) In vivo intradiscal pressure measurement in healthy individuals and in patients with ongoing back problems. Spine 24(23):2468–2474 (Phila Pa 1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schechtman H, Robertson PA, Broom ND (2006) Failure strength of the bovine caudal disc under internal hydrostatic pressure. J Biomech 39(8):1401–1409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schroeder Y, Wilson W, Huyghe JM, Baaijens FPT (2006) Osmoviscoelastic finite element model of the intervertebral disc. Eur Spine J Suppl 3:S361–S371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schultz A, Andersson G, Ortengren R, Haderspeck K, Nachemson A (1982) Loads on the lumbar spine. Validation of a biomechanical analysis by measurements of intradiscal pressures and myoelectric signals. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64(5):713–720Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Silva-Correia J, Correia SI, Oliveira JM, Reis RL (2013) Tissue engineering strategies applied in the regeneration of the human intervertebral disk. Biotechnol Adv 31(8):1514–1531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Steffen T, Baramki HG, Rubin R, Antoniou J, Aebi M (1998) Lumbar intradiscal pressure measured in the anterior and posterolateral annular regions during asymmetrical loading. Clin Biomech 13(7):495–505 (Bristol, Avon)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stokes IF, Laible JP, Gardner-Morse MG, Costi JJ, Iatridis JC (2011) Refinement of elastic, poroelastic, and osmotic tissue properties of intervertebral disks to analyze behavior in compression. Ann Biomed Eng 39(1):122–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Van der Veen AJ, Mullender MG, Kingma I, van Dieen JH, Van JH, Smit TH (2008) Contribution of vertebral bodies, endplates, and intervertebral discs to the compression creep of spinal motion segments. J Biomech 41(6):1260–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Veres SP, Robertson PA, Broom ND (2010) The influence of torsion on disc herniation when combined with flexion. Eur Spine J 19(9):1468–1478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    White AA, Panjabi MM (1990) Clinical biomechanics of the spine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wilke HJ, Neef P, Caimi M, Hoogland T, Claes LE (1999) New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine 24(8):755–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Araújo
    • 1
    Email author
  • N. Peixinho
    • 1
  • A. Pinho
    • 1
  • J.C.P. Claro
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MinhoBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations