Advertisement

Influence of the Mass of the Weight on the Dynamic Response of the Laboratory Fibre-Driven Mechanical System

  • P. PolachEmail author
  • M. Hajžman
Conference paper
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 24)

Abstract

Experimental measurements focused on the investigation of a fibre behaviour are performed on an assembled weigh-fibre-pulley-drive mechanical system. The fibre is driven with one drive and it is led over a pulley. On its other end there is a prism-shaped steel weight, which moves in a prismatic linkage on an inclined plane. An extra mass can be added to the weight. Drive exciting signals can be of a rectangular, a trapezoidal and a quasi-sinusoidal shape and there is a possibility of variation of a signal rate. Time histories of the weight position and of the force acting in the fibre are measured. The same system is numerically investigated by means of a multibody model. The influence of the mass of the weight on the coincidence of results of experimental measurements and simulations is evaluated. The simulations aim is to create a phenomenological model of a fibre, which will be utilizable in fibre modeling in the case of more complicated mechanical or mechatronic systems.

Keywords

Fibre Mechanical system Dynamic response Phenomenological model Experiment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The paper has originated in the framework of solving No. P101/11/1627 project of the Czech Science Foundation and institutional support provided by the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic.

References

  1. 1.
    Chan EHM (2005) Design and implementation of a high-speed cable-based parallel manipulator. Ph.D. thesis, University of Waterloo, WaterlooGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Diao X, Ma O (2009) Vibration analysis of cable-driven parallel manipulators. Multibody Sys Dyn 21:347–360CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gerstmayr J, Sugiyama H, Mikkola A (2012) Developments and future outlook of the absolute nodal coordinate formulation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd joint international conference on multibody system dynamics, Stuttgart, USB flash driveGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gosselin C, Grenier M (2011) On the determination of the force distribution in overconstrained cable-driven parallel mechanisms. Meccanica 46:3–15CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hajžman M, Polach P (2008) Modelling of flexible bodies in the framework of multibody systems. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference dynamics of rigid and deformable bodies 2008, Ústí nad Labem, pp 33–42Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maißer P et al (1998) Alaska, user manual, version 2.3. Institute of Mechatronics, ChemnitzGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Polach P, Hajžman M, Václavík J (2013) Experimental and computational investigation of a simple fibre-mass system. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference engineering mechanics, Svratka, pp 443–452Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Polach P, Hajžman M, Václavík J, Červená O (2014) Dynamics of the weight-fibre-pulley-drive mechanical system: influence of mass of weight at system asymmetry. In: Proceedings of National Colloquium with international participation dynamics of machines, Prague, pp 115–124Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Polach P, Hajžman M, Václavík J, Šika Z, Svatoš P (2013) Model parameters influence of a simple mechanical system with fibre and pulley with respect to experimental measurements. In: Proceedings of ECCOMAS thematic conference multibody dynamics, Zagreb, CD-ROM, pp 473–482Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Polach P, Hajžman M, Václavík J, Šika Z, Valášek M (2013) Experimental and computational investigation of a simple mechanical system with fibre and pulley. In: Proceedings of 12th conference on dynamical systems—theory and applications, dynamical systems—applications, Łódź, pp 717–728Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Polach P, Václavík J, Hajžman M (2012) Load of fibres driving an inverted pendulum system. In: Proceedings of 50th annual international conference on experimental stress analysis, Tábor, pp 337–344Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Polach P, Václavík J, Hajžman M, Šika Z, Valášek M (2013) Influence of the mass of the weight on the dynamic response of the simple mechanical system with fibre. In: Proceedings of 29th conference with international participation computational mechanics, Špičák, pp 97–98Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Půst L, Pešek L, Radolfová A (2011) Various types of dry friction characteristics for vibration damping. Eng Mech 18:203–224Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schiehlen W (2007) Research trends in multibody system dynamics. Multibody Sys Dyn 18:3–13CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shabana AA (1997) Flexible multibody dynamics: review of past and recent developments. Multibody Sys Dyn 1:189–222CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wasfy TM, Noor AK (2003) Computational strategies for flexible multibody systems. Appl Mech Rev 56:553–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research and Testing Institute PlzeňPlzeňCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations