Skip to main content

Conclusion: A Career in Retrospect

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mary Somerville and the World of Science

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in History of Science and Technology ((BRIEFSHIST))

  • 681 Accesses

Abstract

Would Mary Somerville have achieved more, and gone on to make major scientific discoveries, had she been able to go to university, hold down a job, and become the Professorial Director of some research institute? Richard Anthony Proctor, her Royal Astronomical Society obituarist in 1872, lamented that the social proprieties of her day had made it impossible for Mary to really achieve her potential as a planetary dynamicist, while Dr. Mary Brück, in her excellent and perceptive biographical article, styled her a ‘mathematician and astronomer of underused talents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Ref. [1, 2]

  2. 2.

    Proctor, ‘Mary Somerville’, obituary [n. 1], 196, argues against the lack of official funding, especially for salary provision and adequate posts, for British scientists. Even so, he admitted that a successful scientific writer could make between £2,000 and £5,000 a year from writing, while a new edition of a successful work could earn for its author as much as the entire annual salary of a university professor: ‘(say from £500 to £1,000)’, p. 8. While I am not aware of any precise figures for Mary Somerville’s earnings from her books—especially from her consistently in print On the Connexion of the Physical Sciences and Physical Geography—one might take Proctor’s figure from the 1870s as a rough guide to potential earnings for 20 or 30 years earlier.

  3. 3.

    In Memoriam see Ref. [3, 4]

Reference

  1. Richard, A. P., (1873). Mary Somerville, Obituary Notice. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 33, 190–197.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mary, B., (1996). Mary Somerville, mathematician and astronomer of underused talents. Journal of the British Astronomical Association, 106, 4, 201–206.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Elizabeth, B., (1899). F.R. Met. Soc.’, obituary. Journal of the British Astronomical Association, 9, 5, 214–15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chapman, A., (1998) The Victorian Amateur Astronomer. Independent Astronomical Research in Britain, 1820–1920 (pp. 280–293). Chichester, New York: Praxis-Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allan Chapman .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chapman, A. (2015). Conclusion: A Career in Retrospect. In: Mary Somerville and the World of Science. SpringerBriefs in History of Science and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09399-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics