Skip to main content

A Risk-Based Strategy for Climate Change Adaptation in Dryland Systems Based on an Understanding of Potential Production, Soil Resistance and Resilience, and Social Stability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Intensification to Advance Food Security and Enhance Climate Resilience in Africa

Abstract

Climate change is expected to increase the intensity and temporal variability of storm events in many areas while reducing their frequency, resulting in increased runoff, and drought frequency and severity. Soil degradation can exacerbate these impacts by reducing both infiltration and plant-available water holding capacity. Therefore, an understanding of soil resistance and resilience to degradation is necessary to target climate change adaptation investments where they will have the largest impact. This paper (1) reviews key concepts necessary to understand the dynamic relationships between climate change adaptation, soil resistance and resilience, and social stability, and (2) provides a strategy for maximizing return on climate change adaptation investments in drylands based on an understanding of soil and ecosystem resilience. The strategy includes seven steps, which are completed for each landscape unit in the context of the surrounding landscape: (1) Determine current potential productivity based on soils, topography, and existing climate conditions. (2) Determine future potential productivity based on soil, topography, and climate change scenarios. (3) Rank landscape units based on predicted change in potential productivity. (4) Determine risk of land use change. (5) Determine degradation risk with and without land use change. (6) Rank each landscape unit based on degradation risk with and without land use change. (7) Determine priorities for climate change and soil conservation investments. The strategy described here can be applied on multiple scales to address a wide variety of objectives. We conclude by suggesting that climate change adaptation resources allocation decisions include consideration of soil resistance and resilience.

Attention must be given to ensuring high productivity from stable soils, restoring and sustaining the productivity of resilient soils, and conserving fragile and marginal soils.

(Greenland et al. 1994)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    This paper provides a strategy for increasing returns on climate change investments by considering the potential impact of each of these risks on sustainability.

References

  • Alinovi L, Hemrich G et al (2007) Addressing food insecurity in fragile states: case studies from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Somalia and Sudan. FAO Agricultural Development Economics Division Working Paper No. 07-21. FAO, Rome, 26 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Alscher S (2011) Environmental degradation and migration on Hispaniola Island. Int Migr 49:e164–e188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariapour A, Hadid M et al (2013) Water resources suitability model by using GIS (case study: Borujerd Rangeland, Sarab Sefid). J Rangel Sci 3:177–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger R (2003) Conflict over natural resources among pastoralists in northern Kenya: a look at recent initiatives in conflict resolution. J Int Dev 15(2):245–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergholt D, Lujala P (2012) Climate-related natural disasters, economic growth, and armed civil conflict. J Peace Res 49(1):147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum WEH, Santelises AA (1994) A concept of sustainability and resilience based on soil functions: the role of the International Society of Soil Science in promoting sustainable land use. In: Greenland DJ, Szabolos I (eds) Soil resilience and sustainable land use. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 535–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnschweiler CN, Bulte EH (2008) Economics: linking natural resources to slow growth and more conflict. Science 320(5876):616–617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brunnschweiler CN, Bulte EH (2009) Natural resources and violent conflict: resource abundance, dependence, and the onset of civil wars. Oxf Econ Pap 61(4):651–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowie AL, Penman TD et al (2011) Towards sustainable land management in the drylands: scientific connections in monitoring and assessing dryland degradation, climate change and biodiversity. Land Degrad Dev 22:248–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1996) Agro-ecological zoning: guidelines. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Natural Resources and Environment. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2013) Global agro-ecological zones. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Natural Resources and Environment. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray CL (2011) Soil quality and human migration in Kenya and Uganda. Glob Environ Chang 21(2):421–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland DJ, Bowen G et al (1994) Soil, water, and nutrient management research: a new agenda. International Board for Soil Research and Management Position Paper. IBSRAM, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrick J, Brown J et al (2012) Revolutionary land use change in the 21st century: is (rangeland) science relevant? Rangel Ecol Manag 65(6):590–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrick JE, Sala OE et al (2013a) Land degradation and climate change: a sin of omission? Front Ecol Environ 11(6):283–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrick JE, Urama KC et al (2013b) The global land-potential knowledge system (LandPKS) supporting evidence-based, site-specific land use and management through cloud computing, mobile applications, and crowdsourcing. J Soil Water Conserv 68(1):5A–12A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holechek JL, Pieper RD et al (2001) Range management: principles and practices, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones A, Breuning-Madsen H et al (2013) Soil atlas of Africa. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney J (2010) Food consumption trends and drivers. Phil Trans R Soc B 365(1554):2793–2807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiernan K (2010) Environmental degradation in karst areas of Cambodia: a legacy of war? Land Degrad Dev 21(6):503–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriebel D, Tickner J et al (2001) The precautionary principle in environmental science. Environ Health Perspect 109(9):871

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laczko F, Aghazarm C (2009) Migration, environment and climate change: assessing the evidence. International Organization for Migration, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (1997) Degradation and resilience of soils. Phil Trans R Soc B 352(1356):997–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2001) Soil degradation by erosion. Land Degrad Dev 12(6):519–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304:1623–1627

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mafongoya PL, Bationo A et al (2006) Appropriate technologies to replenish soil fertility in southern Africa. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 76(2–3):137–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Marland G, Fruit K et al (2001) Accounting for sequestered carbon: the question of permanence. Environ Sci Policy 4(6):259–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: desertification synthesis. Island Press, Tucson

    Google Scholar 

  • Mkutu K (2001) Pastoralism and conflict in the horn of Africa. Saferworld Organisation, London, 44p

    Google Scholar 

  • Muscolino MS (2011) Violence against people and the land: the environment and refugee migration from China’s Henan province, 1938–1945. Environ Hist 17(2):291–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie M (2003) Drivers of natural resource-based political conflict. Policy Sci 36(3–4):307–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oba G, Weladji RB et al (2010) Scaling effects of proximate desertification drivers on soil nutrients in northeastern Tanzania. J Arid Environ 72(10):1820–1829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters P, Peters PE (2012) Conflicts over land and threats to customary tenure in Africa today. Center for International Development Working Paper No. 247. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 25 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Prazan J, Dumbrovsky M (2010) Soil conservation policies: conditions for their effectiveness in the Czech Republic. Land Degrad Dev 21:124–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JF, Smith DMS et al (2007) Global desertification: building a science for dryland development. Science 316(5826):847–851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer M, Bascompte J et al (2009) Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature 461:53–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scherr SJ (2000) A downward spiral? Research evidence on the relationship between poverty and natural resource degradation. Food Policy 25(4):479–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrader S, Kapi U et al (2013) Namibia survey viewer. http://landpotential.org/. Accessed 5 May 2013

  • Searchinger T, Hanson C et al (2013) The great balancing act: working paper. World Research Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Seybold CA, Herrick JE et al (1999) Soil resilience: a fundamental component of soil quality. Soil Sci 164(4):224–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stavins RN (1999) The costs of carbon sequestration: a revealed-preference approach. Am Econ Rev 89(4):994–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2012) 2012 annual report. UNEP, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine KA (1947) Distance from water as a factor in grazing capacity of rangeland. J For 45:749–754

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to a large number of colleagues around the world with whom we have discussed these issues. This paper benefited particularly from conversations with Kevin Urama. We also thank Kara Shervanick for manuscript preparation assistance and editing, and David Hansen and an anonymous reviewer for their very helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey E. Herrick .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Herrick, J.E., Beh, A. (2015). A Risk-Based Strategy for Climate Change Adaptation in Dryland Systems Based on an Understanding of Potential Production, Soil Resistance and Resilience, and Social Stability. In: Lal, R., Singh, B., Mwaseba, D., Kraybill, D., Hansen, D., Eik, L. (eds) Sustainable Intensification to Advance Food Security and Enhance Climate Resilience in Africa. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09360-4_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics