Abstract
Over the past few decades, there has been a constant increase in the number of patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer in the United States. There were 17,990 newly diagnosed patients with esophageal cancer in 2013, and 15,210 patients died from this malignancy. Although squamous cell carcinoma is the most common malignancy of the esophagus worldwide, adenocarcinoma is considerably more prevalent in the United States. Regardless of histologic character, this malignancy has a reported overall 5-year survival rate of 13–18 % since most patients have advance disease at initial presentation.
Esophageal carcinomas are generally asymptomatic, with patients typically complaining of dysphagia or odynophagia. These symptoms are generally considered late manifestations of the disease process. The esophagus lacks a serosa, which gives way to dilation, and patients are usually not symptomatic until 60 % of the circumference is obstructed. Consequently, one of the major difficulties for patients with esophageal cancer is accurate preoperative staging. Noninvasive staging modalities include computed tomography (CT) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). EUS has become more sensitive with greater than 93 % accuracy in differentiating mucosal versus submucosal lesions. However, there are multiple limiting factors including the location, type of lesion, method and frequency of EUS probe, and the experience of the endosonographer. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for lymph node staging has been compared to PET/CT in recent studies, and PET/CT has consistently predicted nodal status as well as response to neoadjuvant therapy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Worni M, Castleberry AW, Gloor B, et al. Trends and outcomes in the use of surgery and radiation for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer: a propensity score adjusted analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registry from 1998 to 2008. Dis Esophagus. 2014;27(7):662–9.
Thosani N, Singh H, Kapadia A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of EUS in differentiating mucosal versus submucosal invasion of superficial esophageal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:242–53.
Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Ohja B, et al. The accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography with fine-needle aspiration, integrated positron emission tomography with computed tomography, and computed tomography in restaging patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129:1232–41.
Ben-David K, Rossidis G, Zlotecki RA, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is safe and effective following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3324–9.
DePaula AL, Hashiba K, Ferreira EA, et al. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with esophagogastroplasty. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1995;5:1–5.
Kim T, Hochwald SN, Sarosi GA, et al. Review of minimally invasive esophagectomy and current controversies. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:683213.
Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg. 2012;256:95–103.
Ben-David K, Sarosi GA, Cendan JC, et al. Decreasing morbidity and mortality in 100 consecutive minimally invasive esophagectomies. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:162–7.
Ye T, Sun Y, Zhang Y, et al. Three-field or two-field resection for thoracic esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:1933–41.
Ben-David K, Sarosi GA, Cendan JC, et al. Technique of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy with intrathoracic stapled side-to-side anastomosis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:1613–8.
Ben-David K, Kim T, Caban AM, et al. Pre-therapy laparoscopic feeding jejunostomy is safe and effective in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:1352–8.
Markar SR, Arya S, Karthikesalingam A, et al. Technical factors that affect anastomotic integrity following esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:4274–81.
Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1887–92.
Biere SS, Maas KW, Bonavina L, et al. Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial). BMC Surg. 2011;11:2.
Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations. Ann Surg. 2008;248:1081–91.
Hochwald SN, Ben-David K. Minimally invasive esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(9):1775–81.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Creation of a thoracoscopic side-to-side esophagogastric anastomosis (MP4 85623 kb)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ben-David, K., Motamarry, I.P. (2015). Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy with Side-Side Thoracic Anastomosis. In: Hochwald, S., Kukar, M. (eds) Minimally Invasive Foregut Surgery for Malignancy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09342-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09342-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09341-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09342-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)