Skip to main content

Macroscopic Quantum Electrodynamics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Surprises in Theoretical Casimir Physics

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 798 Accesses

Abstract

In his quantum theory of light, Dirac proposed a quantisation of the electromagnetic field, as described by Maxwell’s equations. We briefly propound a simple version of quantum electrodynamics that is suitable for describing some of the effects of quantised electromagnetic fields in media, and determine an expression for the Casimir stress between two interacting objects embedded in a fluid.

Photon, photon, shining bright! Diffracting through the lab. at night. Can even God, with all his might, measure thy position right?

The author

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Monochromatic modes are stationary modes that conserve energy. We therefore expect the Hamiltonian to be the sum of the Hamiltonians of the individual modes.

  2. 2.

    See Sect. 1.1.2.

  3. 3.

    The basic approach adopted in this section is developed in detail in [810]. However, we will not use the Lorentz force expression, which does not recover the standard results for forces in media, but an analogue of the Minkowski stress tensor. Pitaevskii’s comments here are relevant [13, 14].

  4. 4.

    See Appendix B and [21].

  5. 5.

    The accepted use of the ‘Minkowski-like’ stress tensor for computing Casimir forces in the Lifshitz theory [22] was challenged in [23], resulting in some debate [13, 24, 25]. A new argument for the disputed result can be found in [3], where the Casimir stress was derived in the context of the canonical theory of macroscopic quantum electrodynamics [4].

  6. 6.

    Lifshitz theory, in this case, refers to the more general results obtained in [12].

  7. 7.

    This result is not valid when there is absorption. Note that the expression for the variation of the free energy in Lifshitz theory takes a similar form [12]:

    $$ \delta F=\delta F_{0}-\frac{T}{4\pi }\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }\int D_{ii}(\mathbf {r},\mathbf {r},\xi _{n})\delta \epsilon (\mathbf {r},i\xi _{n})\text {d}^{3}\mathbf {r}. $$
  8. 8.

    We note that the first contribution \(\mathbf {f}_{P}\) contains a pressure term which is present in the absence of electromagnetic fluctuations, and a contribution due to the deformation of the medium which vanishes in the limit of an incompressible medium.

  9. 9.

    We retain only the real parts. To take proper account of absorption in media requires a more sophisicated formulation of macro-QED [4]. However, the stress tensor is the same [3].

  10. 10.

    For a discussion of Wick rotation to the imaginary axis, see Appendix A.

  11. 11.

    The full details of this approach can be found in [1].

  12. 12.

    In the limit as \(x'\rightarrow x\), this amounts to subtracting the self-interacting terms. Only waves which have explored the environment contribute to the Casimir force.

  13. 13.

    The Lifshitz result was not originally cast in terms of reflection coefficients, until Kats observed that it was natural to do so [26]. Indeed, expressed in this form [1] it remains valid even when the optical response of the mirrors cannot be described by a local dielectric response function [27].

  14. 14.

    Metamaterials incorporate arrays of micro-engineered circuitry, and can be engineered to produce a strong magnetic response at certain frequencies.

References

  1. U. Leonhardt, Essential Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.D. Jackson, (Wiley, New York, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. T.G. Philbin, New. J. Phys. 13, 063026 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. T.G. Philbin, New J. Phys. 12, 123008 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. E.M. Lifshitz, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 29, 94 (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  6. S.M. Rytov, V.I. Kravtsov, Y.A. Tatarskii (eds.), Principles of Statistical Radiophysics. Wave Propagation Through Random Media. vol. 3 (Springer, Berlin, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  7. F.S.S Rosa, D.A.R Dalvit, P.W Milonni, Phys. Rev. A 81, 033812 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. S.Y. Buhmann, D.-G. Welsch, Prog. Quantum Electr. 31(2), 51–130 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. S.Y. Buhmann, Acta Phys. Slovaca 58(5), 675–809 (2008)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. S.Y. Buhmann, Dispersion Forces I. (Springer, Heidelberg, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Kubo, Rep. Prog. Phys. 29(1), 255 (1966)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. I.E. Dzyaloshinskii, E.M. Lifshitz, L.P. Pitaevskii, Adv. Phys. 10, 165 (1961)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. L.P. Pitaevskii, Phys. Rev. A 73, 047801 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. L.P. Pitaevskii, in Casimir Physics, ed. by D. Dalvit, P. Milonni, D. Roberts, F. da Rosa. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 834 (Springer, Berlin, 2011), pp. 23-37

    Google Scholar 

  15. L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1960)

    Google Scholar 

  16. T.G. Philbin, C. Xiong, U. Leonhardt, Ann. Phys. 325, 579 (2009)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. T.H. Boyer, Phys. Rev. A 9, 2078 (1974)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. F.S.S. Rosa, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 161(1), 012039 (2009)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. S.J. Rahi, T. Emig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 070404 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. S.J. Rahi, T. Emig, R.L. Jaffe, in Casimir Physics, ed. by D. Dalvit, P. Milonni, D. Roberts, F. da Rosa. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 834 (Springer, Berlin, 2011), pp. 129–174

    Google Scholar 

  21. D.J. Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics, vol. 3 (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. A.D. McLachlan, Mol. Phys. 7(4), 381 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  23. C. Raabe, D.-G. Welsch, Phys. Rev. A 80, 067801 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. I. Brevik, S.A. Ellingsen, Phys. Rev. A 79, 027801 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. C. Raabe, D.-G. Welsch, Phys. Rev. A 71, 013814 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. E.I. Kats, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 73, 774 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. Lambrecht, A.C. Duran, R. Guerout, S. Reynaud, in Casimir Physics, ed. by D. Dalvit, P. Milonni, D. Roberts, F. da Rosa. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 834 (Springer, Berlin, 2011), pp. 97–127

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William M. R. Simpson .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simpson, W.M.R. (2015). Macroscopic Quantum Electrodynamics. In: Surprises in Theoretical Casimir Physics. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09315-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics