Skip to main content

Pyramids, Toxic Wastes and Nuclear Reactors Containments: A Lesson Drawn from History with a Risk Manager Perspective

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Engineering Geology for Society and Territory - Volume 7

Abstract

Risk Assessments for “perpetuity” (geo-engineering) projects, i.e. projects that should last “forever” and/or receive “perpetual care”, are raising in number and criticality. These project are oftentimes linked to the storage of wastes containing toxic, not easy to neutralize, not necessarily radioactive, compounds. No prior Human generation had to tackle this problem because: (a) produced volumes were insignificant or (b) there was no real understanding of “perpetuity”. This paper compares the “historic” world-wide rate of major accidents of Tailings Dams and Nuclear Reactors to previously published acceptability criteria and codes. The paper shows how a generic modern “excellent quality” dam probability of failure can be estimated, how the initial probability of failure will evolve during the dam life, as care and monitoring are released in the post production phase and under different hazards. The paper then explores selected Human geo-structures survivability experience and finally suggests a model for long term risk evolution of Tailings Dams, with particular emphasis on post production/closure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ANCOLD (2003) International commission on large dams, Australian National Committee. Guidelineson risk assessment, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Comar C (1987) Risk: a pragmatic de minimis approach. In: Whipple C (ed) De minimis risk. Plenum Press, New York, pp xiii–xiv

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan G, Lave L (1990) Ethical considerations in risk communication practice and research, Risk Anal 10:355–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Oboni F, Oboni C (2013) Factual and foreseeable reliability of Tailings dams and nuclear reactors: a societal acceptability perspective. Tailings & Mine Waste, Banff

    Google Scholar 

  • Oboni F, Oboni C, Zabolotniuk S (2013) Can we stop misrepresenting reality to the public? CIM 2013, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw FM (1990) A major accident prevention program. Plant/Operations Progress 9, no. 3 (July), pp 194–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva F, Lambe TW, Marr WA (2008) Probability and risk of slopes failures. JGGE, ASCE

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman RV (1984) Evaluating calculated risk in geotechnical engineering. J Geotech Eng 110:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson AC, Crouch E (1982) Risk/benefit analysis. Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, pp 92–93

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cesar Oboni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Oboni, F., Oboni, C. (2014). Pyramids, Toxic Wastes and Nuclear Reactors Containments: A Lesson Drawn from History with a Risk Manager Perspective. In: Lollino, G., Arattano, M., Giardino, M., Oliveira, R., Peppoloni, S. (eds) Engineering Geology for Society and Territory - Volume 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09303-1_37

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics