Skip to main content

Diffractive Multifocal IOLs: The AcrivaUD Reviol MFM 611 IOL and AcrivaUD Reviol MF 613 IOL

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multifocal Intraocular Lenses

Part of the book series: Essentials in Ophthalmology ((ESSENTIALS))

  • 1258 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ale JB. Intraocular lens tilt and decentration: a concern for contemporary IOL designs. Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2011;3(1):68–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Knorz MC. Multifocal intraocular lenses: overview of their capabilities, limitations, and clinical benefits. J Refract Surg. 2008;24(3):215–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alió JL, Piñero DP, Plaza-Puche AB, Chan MJ. Visual outcomes and optical performance of a monofocal intraocular lens and a new-generation multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(2):241–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lane SS, Morris M, Nordan L, Packer M, Tarantino N, Wallace 3rd RB. Multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2006;19(1):89–105.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alió JL, Grabner G, Plaza-Puche AB, et al. Postoperative bilateral reading performance with 4 intraocular lens models: six-month results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(5):842–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Can I, Bostancı Ceran B, Soyugelen G, Takmaz T. Comparison of clinical outcomes with 2 small-incision diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(1):60–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alió JL, Piñero DP, Plaza-Puche AB, et al. Visual and optical performance with two different diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses compared to a monofocal lens. J Refract Surg. 2011;27(8):570–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Conrad-Hengerer I, Hengerer FH, Schultz T, Dick HB. Effect of femtosecond laser fragmentation of the nucleus with different softening grid sizes on effective phaco time in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(11):1888–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. van der Linden JW, van der Meulen IJ, Mourits MP, Lapid-Gortzak R. In-the-bag decentration of a hydrophilic radially asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens secondary to capsule contraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(4):642–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Altmann GE, Nichamin LD, Lane SS, Pepose JS. Optical performance of 3 intraocular lens designs in the presence of decentration. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(3):574–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Baumeister M, Bühren J, Kohnen T. Tilt and decentration of spherical and aspheric intraocular lenses: effect on higher-order aberrations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(6):1006–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mester U, Sauer T, Kaymak H. Decentration and tilt of a single-piece aspheric intraocular lens compared with the lens position in young phakic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(3):485–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Crnej A, Hirnschall N, Nishi Y, et al. Impact of intraocular lens haptic design and orientation on decentration and tilt. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(10):1768–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rabsilber TM, Rudalevicius P, Jasinskas V, Holzer MP, Auffarth GU. Influence of +3.00 D and +4.00 D near addition on functional outcomes of a refractive multifocal intraocular lens model. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(3):350–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. de Vries NE, Webers CA, Montés-Micó R, Ferrer-Blasco T, Nuijts RM. Visual outcomes after cataract surgery with implantation of a +3.00 D or +4.00 D aspheric diffractive multifocal intraocular lens: Comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(8):1316–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Toto L, Carpineto P, Falconio G, et al. Comparative study of Acrysof ReSTOR multifocal intraocular lenses +4.00 D and +3.00 D: visual performance and wavefront error. Clin Exp Optom. 2013;96(3):295–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethical Requirements

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Dr. Tomita is a consultant for VSY.

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minoru Tomita .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tomita, M. (2014). Diffractive Multifocal IOLs: The AcrivaUD Reviol MFM 611 IOL and AcrivaUD Reviol MF 613 IOL. In: Alió, J., Pikkel, J. (eds) Multifocal Intraocular Lenses. Essentials in Ophthalmology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09219-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09219-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09218-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09219-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics