Advertisement

An Integrated Approach for Exploring Opportunities and Vulnerabilities of Complex Territorial Systems

  • Valentina Ferretti
  • Marta Bottero
  • Giulio Mondini
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8581)

Abstract

Dealing with territorial transformations assessment means addressing the challenge represented by the inherent complexity and multidimensionality of these systems. This requires an integrated approach for the evaluation in order to obtain concise final judgments. Moreover, when dealing with territorial systems, the analysis of the geographical patterns of the elements under investigation plays a fundamental role. The paper thus proposes an innovative approach for the analysis of a complex territorial system based on the integration of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and a specific Multicriteria Analysis technique, named Analytic Network Process (ANP). In particular, starting from a real case related to a mountain area in Northern Italy, the present paper explores the potentialities of spatial Multicriteria analysis for supporting strategic planning and sustainability assessment procedures.

Keywords

Scenario analysis Multicriteria Analysis Spatial Decision Support Systems Analytic Network Process 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Torrieri, F., Nijkmap, P.: Scenario Analysis in Spatial Impact Assessment: a methodological approach. In: Vreeker, R., Deakin, M., Curwell, S. (eds.) Sustainable Urban Development. Volume 3: The Toolkit for Assessment. Routledge, Oxon (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nijkamp, P., Rienstra, S., Vleugel, J.: Transportation and the Future. Wiley, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nijkamp, P., Rienstra, S.A.: The pivotal role of the private sector in achieving transport policy objectives. European Spatial Research and Policy, 93–113 (1998) (Spring)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Malczewski, J.: GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kahn, H., Weiner, A.: The Year 2000: A Framework for Speculation on the Next Thirty-Three Years. McMillan, New York (1967)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Warfield, J.: An Overview of Futures Methods. In: Slaughter, R. (ed.) The Foresight Principle. Praeger, Connecticut (1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ratcliffe, R.: Scenario Building: A Suitable Method for Strategic Property Planning? Property Management 18(2), 127–144 (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Godet, M.: Scenarios and Strategic Management. Butterworths, London (1987)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schwartz, P.: The Art of the Long View. Currency Doubleday, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stewart, T., Franch, S., Rios, J.: Integrating multicriteria decision analysis and scenario planning—Review and extension. Omega 41, 679–688 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Montibeller, G., Franco, A.: Decision and Risk Analysis for the Evaluation of Strategic Options. In: O’brien, F.A., Dyson, R.G. (eds.) Supporting Strategy: Frameworks. Methods and Models. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Volk, M., Hirschfeld, J., Schmidt, G., Bohn, C., Dehnhardt, A., Liersch, S., Lym-burner, L.: A SDSS-based Ecological-economic Modelling Approach for Integrated River Basin Management on Different Scale Levels – The Project FLUMAGIS. Water Resour. Manag. 21, 2049–2061 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duzgun, H.S.B., Yucemen, M.S., Kalaycioglu, H.S., Celik, K., Kemec, S., Ertugay, K., Deniz, A.: An integrated earthquake vulnerability assessment framework for urban areas. Nat. Hazards 59, 917–947 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zerger, A., Wealands, S.: Beyond Modelling: Linking Models with GIS for Flood Risk Management. Nat.l Hazards 33, 191–208 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scholten, H.J., LoCashio, A., Overduin, T.: Towards a spatial information infra-structure for flood management in The Netherlands. Journal of Coastal Conservation 4, 151–160 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brody, S.D., Grover, H., Bernhardt, S., Tang, Z., Whitaker, B., Spence, C.: Identifying Potential Conflict Associated with Oil and Gas Exploration in Texas State Coastal Waters: A Multicriteria Spatial Analysis. J. Environ. Manage. 38, 597–617 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Volk, M., Lautenbach, S., van Delden, H., Newham, L.T.H., Seppelt, R.: How Can We Make Progress with Decision Support Systems in Landscape and River Basin Management? Lessons Learned from a Comparative Analysis of Four Different Decision Support Systems. J. Environ. Manage. 46, 834–849 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ballas, D., Kingston, R., Stillwell, J.: Using a Spatial Microsimulation Decision Support System for Policy Scenario Analysis. In: van Leeuwen, J.P., Timmermans, H.J.P. (eds.) Recent Advances in Design and Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grueau, C., Rodrigues, A.: Simulation Tools for Transparent Decision Making in Environmental Planning. Paper presented at the Second Annual Conference of GeoComputation 1997 & SIRC 1997, August 26-29. University of Otago, New Zealand (1997)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rutledge, D.T., Cameron, M., Elliott, S., et al.: Choosing Regional Futures: Challenges and choices in building integrated models to support long-term regional planning in New Zealand. Regional Science Policy & Practice 1, 85–108 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Danese, M., Lazzari, M., Murgante, B.: Integrated geological, geomorphological and geostatistical analysis to study macroseismic effects of 1980 Irpinian earth-quake in urban areas (southern Italy). In: Gervasi, O., Taniar, D., Murgante, B., Laganà, A., Mun, Y., Gavrilova, M.L., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2009, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5592, pp. 50–65. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ferretti, V.: Le Analisi Multicriteri spaziali a supporto delle procedure di pianificazione e valutazione: analisi e classificazione della letteratura scientifica. Geoingegneria Ambientale e Mineraria L (2), 53-66 (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sharifi, M.A., Retsios, V.: Site selection for waste disposal through spatial multiple criteria decision analysis. J. Telecommun. Inf. Technol. 3, 28–38 (2004)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Keeney, R.L.: Value focused thinking. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill, New York (1980)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Saaty, T.L.: Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (2005)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sharifi, M.A., Rodriguez, E.: Design and development of a planning support system for policy formulation in water resources rehabilitation: The case of Alcázar De San Juan District in the Aquifer La Mancha Spain. Int. J. Hydroinformatics 4(3), 157–175 (2002)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ferretti, V., Pomarico, S.: Ecological land suitability analysis through spatial indicators: An application of the Analytic Network Process technique and Ordered Weighted Average approach. Ecol. Indic. 34, 507–519 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nijkamp, P., Vindigni, G.: Impact assessment of qualitative policy scenarios. A comparative case study on land use in Sicily. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 14(1), 108–133 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valentina Ferretti
    • 1
  • Marta Bottero
    • 1
  • Giulio Mondini
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Regional and Urban Studies and PlanningPolitecnico di TorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations