A Multiobjective Model for Biodiesel Blends Minimizing Cost and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The goal of this paper is to present a multiobjective model to optimize the blend of virgin oils for biodiesel production, minimizing costs and life-cycle Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions. Prediction models for biodiesel properties based on the chemical composition of the oils were used to establish technical constraints of the model. Biodiesel produced in Portugal from palm, rapeseed and/or soya was used as a case study. The model was solved using the Ɛ-constraint method and the resulting Pareto curve reveals the trade-off between costs and GHG emissions, from which it was possible to calculate GHG abatement costs. Illustrative results are presented: GHG emissions (not accounting for direct and indirect Land Use Change -LUC) and biodiesel production costs (focused on oil feedstock). Analyzing the blends along the Pareto curve, a reduction in GHG emissions is obtained by progressively replacing rapeseed by soya and reducing the palm share in the blend used for biodiesel production.
KeywordsBiodiesel blend Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Multiobjective model
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.OECD-FAO: Agricultural Outlook 2011-2020 OECD/FAO (2011) Google Scholar
- 6.European Comission: Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources, 16–62 (2009)Google Scholar
- 9.Lingshuang, K., Chunhua, Y., Shenping, X., Gang, C.: Stochastic Optimization Method Based on HSS Technique and Expert Knowledge for a Metallurgical Blending Process. In: 2013 Third International Conference on Intelligent System Design and Engineering Applications, pp. 1290–1293 (2013)Google Scholar
- 10.European Committee for Standardization. EN 14214: automotive fuels – fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) for diesel engines – requirements and test methods.Report no. EN 14214:2008. Management Centre (2008)Google Scholar
- 11.Standard specification for biodiesel fuel blend stock (B100) for middle distillate fuels. Report no. D6751-08. ASTM (2008)Google Scholar
- 12.Bamgboye, A.I., Hansen, A.C.: Prediction of cetane number of biodiesel fuel from the fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) composition, 21–29 (2008)Google Scholar
- 16.Castanheira, É.G., Freire, F.: Avaliação de Ciclo de Vida das emissões de Gases com Efeito de Estufa da Produção de Biodiesel de Soja em Portugal. Relatório Final elaborado para a APPB, no âmbito do Protocolo de colaboração entre a APPB e a ADAI. Coimbra (2011)Google Scholar
- 18.Castanheira, É.G.: Environmental sustainability assessment of soybean and palm biodiesel systems: A life-cycle approach, University of Coimbra (2014)Google Scholar
- 20.Index Mundi, http://www.indexmundi.com/
- 21.GAMS Development Corporation. General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS) Release 23.7.3 Washington, DC, USA (2011)Google Scholar
- 22.Diekmann, J., Jochem, E.: Methodological Guideline for Assessing the Impact of Measures for Emission Mitigation, Jülich (1998)Google Scholar
- 23.UNEP: Mitigation and Adaptation Assessment. Concepts, Methods and Appropriate Use. UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment, Roskilde, Denmark, p. 169 (1998)Google Scholar