VGI to Enhance Minor Historic Centres and Their Territorial Cultural Heritage

  • Pierangela Loconte
  • Francesco Rotondo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8581)


The advent of Web 2.0 and the development of information and communication technologies represent an opportunity to reduce the spatial distances and enhance fast access to any type of information.

In particular, in recent years, the spread of Smart Mobile Applications and an increasing accessibility to social networks has provoked a growth of exchanged information and shared knowledge. Among the multiple applications, for spatial planning disciplines, it is interesting those related to the city and to urban and regional development’s processes.

The processes of e-planning and e-participation for enhancing minor historic centers and their territorial cultural heritage have a particular interest.

This paper will try to understand what are the new strategies for development and enhancement of cultural territorial systems through the use of these tools and what are the perspectives for development.

In particular, in the first part of the work we try to understand what are the new tools available for the construction of knowledge and the enhancement of cultural heritage, while in the second part we define possible uses for these tools and why these technologies can be an opportunity for minor historic centers and their surrounding landscapes.

Finally, in the last part we bring the reader’s attention to a series of international case studies of particular interest in order to understand whether these new tools can be an effective support for decision-making processes and for the preparation of plans and projects of regeneration and enhancement of minor historic centers and their territorial cultural heritage.


ICT minor historic centers participation volunteered geographic information urban and regional planning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Council of Europe: European Landscape Convention. Strasbourg (2000),
  2. 2.
    Rescia, A.J., Willaarts, B.A., Schmitz, M.F., Aguilera, P.A.: Changes in land uses and management in two Nature Reserves in Spain: Evaluating the social–ecological resilience of cultural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 98, 26–35 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aretano, R., Petrosillo, I., Zaccarelli, N., Semeraro, T., Zurlini, G.: People perception of landscape change effects on ecosystem services in small Mediterranean islands: A combination of subjective and objective assessments. Landscape and Urban Planning (112), 63–73 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clementi, A.: Revisioni di paesaggio, Meltemi, Roma (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Magnaghi, A.: The Urban Village: A Charter for Democracy and Local Self-sustainable Development. Zed Books, London (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang, H., Song, Y., Hamilton, A., Curwell, S.: Urban information integration for advanced e-Planning in Europe. Government Information Quarterly (24), 736–754 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shiffer, M.J.: Towards a collaborative planning system. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 19, 709–722 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rotondo, F.: The U-City Paradigm: Opportunities and Risks for E-Democracy in Collaborative Planning. Future Internet 4, 563–574 (2012), doi:10.3390/fi4020563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Antrop, M.: Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning 70, 21–34 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tulloch, D.: Is VGI participation? From vernal pools to video games. GeoJournal 72(3), 161–171 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goodchild, M.F.: Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69, 211–221 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brown, G., Kelly, M., Whitall, D.: Which ‘public’? Sampling effects in public participation GIS (PPGIS) and volunteered geographic information (VGI) systems for public lands management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management (2013),
  13. 13.
    Healey, P.: Collaborative planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver (1997)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roche, S., Mericskay, B., Batita, W., Bach, M., Rondeau, M.: WikiGIS Basic Concepts: Web 2.0 for Geospatial Collaboration. Future Internet 4, 265–284 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Garnero, G., Corrias, A., Manigas, L., Zedda, S.V.: VGI, Augmented Reality and Smart Web Application: Projects of Development in the Territory of the Sardinia Region. In: Murgante, B., Misra, S., Carlini, M., Torre, C.M., Nguyen, H.-Q., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O., Gervasi, O. (eds.) ICCSA 2013, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 7974, pp. 77–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rotondo, F., Selicato, F.: E-Democracy in Collaborative Planning: A Critical Review. In: Murgante, B., Gervasi, O., Iglesias, A., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2011, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6783, pp. 199–209. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Organization of Economic Co-Operation and Development: Environmental Indicators for Agriculture Methods and Results, OECD, Parigi (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    UNESCO: Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (1972)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bonfantini, G.B.: Planning the historic centres in Italy: For a critical outline. Planum. The Journal of Urbanism (25), 1–19 (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fusco Girard, L.: Processi valutativi per lo sviluppo sostenibile. In: Brunetta, G., Pistoia, R. (eds.) (a cura di), Trasformazioni, coesioni, sviluppo territoriale. Temi emergenti nella scienze regionali; Associazione Italiana di Scienze Regonali, Franco Angeli, Milano, vol. (38) (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chandler, A.D.: Strategy and structure. Chapters un the history of the American industrial enterprise. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1962)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ministero per i Beni e le Attività Culturali: Progetto di definizione di un modello per la realizzazione dei Piani di Gestione dei siti UNESCO (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kelsey, C., Gray, H.: The citizen survey process in parks and recreation. American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, Reston, VA (1986)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Modica, G., Zoccali, P., Di Fazio, S.: The e-Participation in Tranquillity Areas Identification as a Key Factor for Sustainable Landscape Planning. In: Murgante, B., Misra, S., Carlini, M., Torre, C.M., Nguyen, H.-Q., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O., Gervasi, O. (eds.) ICCSA 2013, Part III. LNCS, vol. 7973, pp. 550–565. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tress, B., Tress, G.: Capitalising on multiplicity: A transdisciplinary systems approach to landscape research. Landscape and Urban Planning 57, 143–157 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brown g., Weber D.: A place-based approach to conservation management using public participation GIS (PPGIS). Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1–19 (2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Carver, S., et al.: Public participation, GIS, and cyberdemocracy: Evaluating on-line spatial decision support systems. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28, 907–921 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kingston, R.: Public participation in local policy decision-making: The role of web-based mapping. Cartographic Journal 44(2), 138–144 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Beverly, J., et al.: Assessing spatial attributes of forest landscape values: An internetbased participatory mapping approach. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38(2), 289–303 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Brown, G., Reed, P.: Public participation GIS: A new method for national forest planning. Forest Science 55(2), 166–182 (2009)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brown, G., Weber, D.: Public participation GIS: A new method for use in national park planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 102(1), 1–15 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pocewicz, A., et al.: An evaluation of internet versus paper-based methods for public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS). Transactions in GIS 16(1), 39–53 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Apulia Region: Landscape Observatory (2009), (accessed February 6, 2014)
  34. 34.
    Sardinia Region: Sardinia geoblog (2011), (accessed February 6, 2014)
  35. 35.
    Sardinia Region: plus. Cross-border network for the enhancement of landscapes and local identities (2011), (accessed February 6, 2014)
  36. 36.
    Viggiano Municipality: MUVIG. Museum of Local Traditions, (accessed February 6, 2014)
  37. 37.
    Landscape Values & PPGIS Institute: (accessed February 6, 2014)
  38. 38.
    Région Pays de la Loire: (accessed February 6, 2014)
  39. 39.
    UNESCO: Recommendation on the Conservation of Historic Urban Landscape, 1st Draft for discussion (2010)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Attardi, R., Pisani, G., Selicato, S.: Scenario Workshop as tools for Planning the Redevelopment of Historic Territorial Assets. In: Scutelnicu, E.D., Rotondo, F., Varum, H. (eds.) Recent Advances in Engineering Mechanics, Structures and Urban Planning. WSEAS Press, Cambridge (2013)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rotondo, F., Loconte, P.: Innovations in practice. Regional regeneration strategies for municipalities networks. In: Scutelnicu, E.D., Rotondo, F., Varum, H. (eds.) Recent Advances in Engineering Mechanics, Structures and Urban Planning. WSEAS Press, Cambridge (2013)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Torre, C.M., Perchinunno, P., Rotondo, F.: Estimates of housing costs and housing difficulties: An application on Italian metropolitan areas. In: Housing, Housing Costs and Mortgages: Trends, Impact and Prediction, pp. 93–108. Nova Science Publications, New York (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierangela Loconte
    • 1
  • Francesco Rotondo
    • 1
  1. 1.Polytechnic of BariBariItaly

Personalised recommendations