Advertisement

Sketching Smart and Fair Cities WebGIS and Spread Sheets in a Code

  • Salvatore Giuffrida
  • Filippo Gagliano
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8581)

Abstract

The operative context of the urban regeneration is nowadays strictly connected to the information systems by means of which the urban wealth surplus is reallocated. One of the most relevant points of the regeneration policies is the lack of a general tool that allows to roughly “sketch the city”, that means, that produces significant options about physical, qualitative and monetary contents of the plan. The pattern we propose allows to implement detailed planning options that are valued real time so that the final solution can be progressively fitted until the best one is found. The pattern works by constantly comparing with and without project options, so that the qualitative and quantitative surplus production can be monitored. The unification of the input system makes the system more reliable.

Keywords

Urban regeneration transfer development rights Gis-Spreadsheets model plan appraisal Web planning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Amata, G. (ed.): La Sicilia e il trasporto integrato. Un approccio per la modernizzazione del sistema di trasporti, Troina (EN), Città aperta (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dirks, S., Keeling, J.: How smart is your city? Helping cities measure progress, Somers (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dyer, J.S.: MAUT. In: Figueira, J.R., et al. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pp. 265–295. Springer, Berlin (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fregonara, E.: Architettura sostenibile, risparmio energetico e mercato immobiliare. Territori 10, 16–25 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Giuffrida, S.: Programmi di recupero a Napoli. La valutazione del progetto integrato e la prassi del processo perequativo. Genio Rurale – Estimo e territorio 4 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Giuffrida, S.: Dalla teoria del capitale alla prassi della perequazione urbanistica: il caso del PRG di Cercola (NA). In: Giordano, G. (ed.) Pratiche di Valutazione, pp. 145–187. Denaro Libri, Napoli (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Giuffrida, S., Gagliano, F.: Information and Creativity of the Port City Plan. A Gis-Based Assessment Model for Catania’s Harbor area. BDC Università di Napoli 721-735 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kammeier, H.D.: New tools for spatial analysis and planning as components of an incremental planning-support system. Environ. Plan. B: Plan. Design 26, 365–380 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li, X., Yeh, A.G.O.: Modelling Sustainable Urban Development Bythe Integration of Constrained Cellular Automata and GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 14(2), 131–152 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luhmann, N.: Sistemi sociali. Fondamenti di una teoria generale. Il Mulino, Bologna (1990)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mocerino, C.: Tecno efficienza nella smart rigenerazione urbana. In: Castagneto, F., Fiore, V. (eds.) Recupero, Valorizzazione Manutenzione nei Centri Storici, pp. 262–265. Letteraventidue, Siracusa (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rizzo, F.: Il capitale sociale della città. Franco Angeli, Milano (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rizzo, F.: Valore e valutazioni. La scienza dell’economia o l’economia della scienza, Franco Angeli, Milano (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rodenhoff, V.: The Aarhus convention and its implications for the ‘Institutions’ of the European Community. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 11, 343–357 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sanchez, L., et al.: Integration of Utilities Infrastructures in a Future Internet Enabled Smart City Framwork. Sensors 13 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stanghellini, S.: Il plafond perequativo del Prg di Catania, Urbanistica Informazioni 197 settembre-ottobre, Roma, Inu Edizioni (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Torre, C.M., Bonifazi, A.: l’integrazione metodologica tra piano e procedure valutative. La VAS del Piano Urbanistico Generale di Monopoli. In: Bentivegna, V., Miccoli, S. (eds.) Valutazione, Progettazione, Urbanistica, DEI, Roma (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vattano, S.: Una rigenerazione smart per i centri storici. In: Castagneto, F., Fiore, V. (eds.) Recupero, Valorizzazione Manutenzione nei Centri Storici, pp. 266–269. Letteraventidue, Siracusa (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Salvatore Giuffrida
    • 1
  • Filippo Gagliano
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureUniversity of CataniaItaly

Personalised recommendations