Skip to main content

A Procedure for Semi-automatic Segmentation in OBIA Based on the Maximization of a Comparison Index

  • Conference paper
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2014 (ICCSA 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8579))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In an Object Based Image Analysis Classification (OBIA) process, the quality of the classification results are highly dependent on segmentation. However, a high number of the studies that make use of an OBIA process find the segmentation parameters by making use of trial-and-error methods. It is clear that a lack of a structured procedure to determine the segmentation parameters produces unquantified errors in the classification. This paper aims to quantify the effects of using a semi-automatic approach to determine optimal segmentation parameters. To this end, an OBIA process is performed to classify land cover types produced by both a manual and an automatic segmentation. Even though the classification using the manual segmentation outperforms the automatic segmentation, the difference is only 2%. Since the automatic segmentation is performed with optimal parameters, a procedure to accurately determine those parameters must be performed to minimize the error produced by a misjudgment in the segmentation step.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hay, G., Castilla, G.: Object-based image analysis: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT). In: Proc. 1st Int. Conf. OBIA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dronova, I., Gong, P., Clinton, N.E., Wang, L., Fu, W., Qi, S., Liu, Y.: Landscape analysis of wetland plant functional types: The effects of image segmentation scale, vegetation classes and classification methods. Remote Sensing of Environment 127, 357–369 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gao, Y., Mas, J.: A Comparison of the Performance of Pixel Based and Object Based Classifications over Images with Various Spatial Resolutions. Online Journal of Earth Sciences (8701) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Whiteside, T.G., Boggs, G.S., Maier, S.W.: Comparing object-based and pixel-based classifications for mapping savannas. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 13(6), 884–893 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hantson, W., Kooistra, L., Slim, P.A.: Mapping invasive woody species in coastal dunes in the Netherlands: a remote sensing approach using LIDAR and high-resolution aerial photographs. Applied Vegetation Science 15(4), 536–547 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tzotsos, A., Argialas, D.: A support vector machine approach for object based image analysis. In: …Conference on Object-Based Image Analysis …(Negnevitsky) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yu, Q., Gong, P., Clinton, N.: Object-based detailed vegetation classification with airborne high spatial resolution remote sensing imagery. …Remote Sensing 72(7), 799–811 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Navulur, K.: Multispectral Image Analysis Using the Object-Oriented Paradigm. CRC Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blaschke, T.: Object-based contextual image classification built on image segmentation. Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely …00(C) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baatz, M., Schäpe, A.: Multiresolution segmentation: an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation. Angewandte Geographische …(2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Trimble: eCognition Developer 8.8 Reference Book (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Trimble: eCognition Developer 8.8 User Guide (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, D., Xia, F.: Assessing object-based classification: advantages and limitations. Remote Sensing Letters 1(4), 187–194 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Möller, M., Lymburner, L., Volk, M.: The comparison index: A tool for assessing the accuracy of image segmentation. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 9(3), 311–321 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gahegan, M.: Is inductive machine learning just another wild goose (or might it lay the golden egg)? International Journal of Geographical Information Science 17, 69–92 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Atkinson, P.M., Tatnall, A.R.L.: Introduction Neural networks in remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 37–41 (2010, October 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Melgani, F., Bruzzone, L.: Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 42(8), 1778–1790 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector networks. Machine Learning 297, 273–297 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson, B., Xie, Z.: Unsupervised image segmentation evaluation and refinement using a multi-scale approach. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 66(4), 473–483 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. QuantumGIS: Quantumgis (August 2013), http://www.qgis.org/

  21. scikit learn: scikit-learn (August 2013), http://scikit-learn.org/

  22. Python: Python (August 2013), http://www.python.org/about/

  23. PostgresSQL: Postgressql (August 2013), http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/interactive/index.html

  24. PostGIS: Postgis (August 2013), http://postgis.net/

  25. Benz, U.C., Hofmann, P., Willhauck, G., Lingenfelder, I., Heynen, M.: Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 58(3-4), 239–258 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhan, Q., Molenaar, M.: Quality assessment for geo-spatial objects derived from remotely sensed data. …Journal of Remote Sensing 26(14), 2953–2974 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mountrakis, G., Im, J., Ogole, C.: Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 66(3), 247–259 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Auquilla, A., Heremans, S., Vanegas, P., Van Orshoven, J. (2014). A Procedure for Semi-automatic Segmentation in OBIA Based on the Maximization of a Comparison Index. In: Murgante, B., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2014. ICCSA 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8579. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09144-0_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09144-0_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09143-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09144-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics