Skip to main content

Crowdsourced Monitoring, Citizen Empowerment and Data Credibility

The Case of Observations.be

  • Conference paper
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2014 (ICCSA 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8580))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Crowdsourcing is today a revolutionary phenomenon changing profoundly our ways of communicating and producing. This article is interested in two issues that are crucial to its development and impacts. On one hand, it investigates the forms and limits of crowdsourcing-related citizen empowerment. It is less concerned by the now recognized fact that crowdsourcing is empowering, but rather focuses on the ways it does so and the architecture of the relations between citizens, scientists and institutions in this new context. On the other, it discusses the question of credibility of data produced through crowdsourcing. This question represents, in fact, the Achilles’ heel that destabilizes the rise of citizen power in the face of experts and institutions. In its discussion of these two issues, the article relies on a particularly interesting case study: the online platform of participatory monitoring of biodiversity in Belgium Observations.be. The creation of databases is an occasion here for reflexivity, learning and mobilisation. It is also an occasion for the liberation of the lay citizen, as an individual, from the straightjackets delimiting the institutional, scientific and associative spaces where he remains a subject, a collaborator or a member – always in a subordinate position. He becomes a peer producer, partner and discussant. More important, learning and action networks that develop in the platform cut transversally through the three spheres. We find unexpected and new cooperations between citizen, scientists and civil servants. Likewise, actions developed through the platform, mainly reporting, counting campaigns and early alert systems attest new modes of action that transgress the functional and ontological division of the three spheres.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allagui, I., Kuebler, J.: The Arab Spring and the Role of ICTs: Editorial Introduction. International Journal of Communication 5, 1435–1442 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aubertin, C., Boisvert, V., Vivien, F.-D.: La construction sociale de la question de la biodiversité, In. Natures Sciences et Sociétés 6(1), 7–19 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bell, S., Marzano, M., Cent, J., Kobierska, H., Podjed, D., Vandzinskaite, D., Reinert, H., Armaitiene, A., GrodziŃSka-Jurczak, M., MuršIč, R.: What counts? Volunteers and their organisations in the recording and monitoring of biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 17, 3443–3454 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boiller, D.: Viral Spiral – How the Commoners Built a Digital Republic on their Own, copy[at]viralspiral.cc (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bonner, D., Cooper, C.: Data validation in citizen science: a case study from Project Feeder Watch. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10, 305–307 (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/110273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boulos, K.M.N., Resch, B., Crowley, D.N., Breslin, J.G., Sohn, G., Burtner, R., Pike, W., Jezierski, E., Chuang, K.-Y.S.: Crowdsourcing, citizen sensing and sensor web technologies for public and environmental health surveillance and crisis magement : trends, OGC standards and application examples. International Journal of Health Geographics 10(67) (2011), http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/10/1/67

  7. Brabham, D.: Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects. Planning Theory 8, 242–262 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brabham, D., Sanchez, T., Bathelomew, K.: Crowdsourcing Public Participation in Transit Planning: Preliminary Results from the Next Stop Design Case. Paper presented at TRB (August 1, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brando, C., Bucher, B.: Quality in User-Generated Spatial Content: A Matter of Specifications. In: Proceedings of the 13th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Guimarães, Portugal, May 10-14 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bruntland Report. Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Buchanan, G., Nelson, A., Mayaux, P., Hartley, A., Donald, P.: Delivering a Global, Terrestrial, Biodiversity Observation System through Remote Sensing. Conservation Biology 23(2), 499–502 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Callister, T.A.: Media literacy: On-ramp to the literacy of the 21st century or cul-de-sac on the information superhighway. Advances in Reading/Language Research 7, 403–420 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Castells, M.: Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Polity Press, Cambridge et Malden (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Charvolin, F., Micoud, A., Coord, N.L.: Des sciences citoyennes ? La question de l’amateur dans les sciences naturalists. Éditions de l’Aube, Aigues (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cohn, J.: Citizen Science: Can Volunteers Do Real Research ? BioScience 58(3), 192–197 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Coops, N., Walder, M., Iwanicka, D.: An environmental domain classification of Canada using earth observation data for biodiversity assessment. Ecological Informatics 4, 8–22 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cox, L.-P.: Truth in Crowdsourcing. Security & Privacy IEEE 9(5), 74–76 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Danielsen, F., Balete, D., Poulsen, M., Enghoff, M., Nozawa, C., Jensen, A.: A simple system for monitoring biodiversity in protected areas of a developing country. Biodiversity and Conservation 9, 1671–1705 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Flanigin, A., Metzger, M.: The credibility of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal 72, 137–148 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gao, H., Barbier, G., Goolsby, R.: Harnessing the Crowdsourcing Power of Social Media for Disaster Relief. In: Zeng, D. (ed.) Cyber-Physical-Social Systems. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Heinzelman, J., Waters, C.: Crowdsourcing Crisis Information in Disaster-Affected Haïti, special report. United States Institute of Peace, Washington (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hudson-Smith, A., Batty, M., Crooks, R., Milton, R.: Mapping for the Masses: Accessing Web 2.0 through Crowdsourcing. UCL Working Papers Series, Paper 143. University College of London, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Latour, B.: From realpolitik to dingpolitik or how to make things public. In: Latour, B., Weibel, P. (eds.) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. ZKM/MIT Press, Karlsruhe (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Latour, B.: Politiques de la nature: comment faire entrer les sciences en démocratie. La Découverte, Paris (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Latour, B.: Nous n’avonsjamaisétémodernes:essaid’anthropologiesymétrique. La Découverte, Paris (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Levrel, H., Fontaine, B., Henry, P.-Y., Jiguet, F., Julliard, R., Kerbiriou, C., Couvet, D.: Balancing state and volunteer investment in biodiversity monitoring for the implementation of CBD indicators: A French example. Ecological Economics 69(7), 1580–1586 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Madden, M., Fox, S.: Riding the Waves of Web 2.0: More than a Buzz Word but Still not Easily Defined. Pew Internet and American Life Project (2006), http://clearwww.co-bw.com/Ethics/ethics_Web_2.pdf

  28. Neis, P., Zielstra, D., Zipf, A.: The Street Network Evolution of Crowdsourced Maps: OpenStreetMap in Germany 2007–2011. Future Internet 4, 1–21 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ostrom, E.: Governing the commons. Cambridge University Press (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C., Norgaard, R., Policansky, D.: Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. Science 284, 278–282 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rappaport, R.: In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology 9, 1–25 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Salem, B.B.: Application of GIS to biodiversity monitoring. Journal of Arid Environments 54, 91–114 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Scholes, R.J., Mace, M., Tumer, W., Geller, G.N., Jürgens, N., Larugauderie, A., Muchoney, D., Walther, B.A., Mooney, H.A.: Towards a Global Biodiversity Observation System. Science 321, 1044–1045 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Seltzer, E., Mahmoudi, D.: Citizen Participation, Open Innovation and Crowdsourcing: Challenges and Opportunities for Planning. Journal of Planning Literature 28(1), 3–18 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Surowiecki, J.: The Wisdom of the Crowds. Anchor Books, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Toomey, D.: How Rise of Citizen Science is Democratizing Research. Environment 360 (2014), http://e360.yale.edu/

  37. Tulloch, D.: Many, many maps: Empowerment and online participatory mapping. First Monday 12(2) (2007), http://www.firstmonday.dk/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1620

  38. Whitelaw, G., Vaughan, H., Craig, B., Atkinson, B.: Establishing The Canadian Community Monitoring Network. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 88, 409–418 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zimmermann, M.A., Israel, B.A., Schulz, A., Checkoway, B.: Further explorations in empowerment theory: An empirical analysis of psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology 20, 707–727 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Farah, J. (2014). Crowdsourced Monitoring, Citizen Empowerment and Data Credibility. In: Murgante, B., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2014. ICCSA 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8580. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09129-7_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09129-7_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09128-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09129-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics