Capturing Cross-Domain Ripples

  • Suman Deb RoyEmail author
  • Wenjun Zeng


Various web domains present original, updated or aggregated multimedia content for users. Media on the Internet is unevenly distributed into domains depending on platforms, popularity and bias. The domain where it originates limits its power. For example, video popularity is usually judged by view count but not by how trending the video topic is on another domain. Similarly, Twitter users can only see related media shared in Twitter, but not from external sources. This compels users to perform unguided search in external resources manually. Such video sites are more often than not filled with an explosion of video/image information. Thus the need for better cross-domain media recommendation systems is considered to be a key constituent to social search and empowering online media.


Topic Modeling Latent Dirichlet Allocation Auxiliary Data Feature Word Social Topic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Roy, S. D., Mei, T., Zeng, W., & Li, S. (2012). SocialTransfer: Cross-domain transfer learning from social streams for media applications. Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on multimedia, pp. 649–658.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shi, J., Belongie, S., Leung, T., & Malik, J. (1998). Image and video segmentation: The normalized cut framework. Proceedings of 1998 IEEE international conference on image processing, vol. 1, pp. 943–947.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roy, S. D., Zeng, W., Mei, T., & Li. S. (2013). Towards cross-domain learning for social video popularity prediction. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, Special Issue on Social Media as Sensors, 15(6), 1255–1276.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jin, X., Gallagher, A. C., Cao, L., Luo, J., & Han, J. (2010). The wisdom of social multimedia: Using flickr for prediction and forecast. Proceedings of ACM multimedia, pp. 1235–1244.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang, C., Paisley, J. W., & Blei, D. M. (2011). Online variational inference for the hierarchical Dirichlet process. International conference on artificial intelligence and statistics. Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bach, F. R., & Jordan, M. I. (2006). Learning spectral clustering, with application to speech separation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7, 1963–2001.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin, F., & Cohen, W. W. (2010). Power iteration clustering. Proceedings of the 27th international conference on machine learning (ICML-10).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dai, W., Jin, O., Xue, G.-R., Yang, Q., & Yu, Y. (2009). Eigentransfer: A unified framework for transfer learning. In: Proceedings of the international conference on machine learning, p. 25.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mavroeidis, D. (2011). Mind the eigen-gap, or how to accelerate semi-supervised spectral learning algorithms. Proceedings of the international joint conference on artificial intelligence, pp. 2692–2697.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BetaworksNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations