Advertisement

Measuring Participation in the Arts in Italy

  • Annalisa Cicerchia
Chapter

Abstract

Over the last two decades, cultural participation has vastly changed its modes and contents. Its measurement is undergoing a thorough revision by relevant institutions, such as UNESCO and Eurostat. Today, studies on cultural participation focus today on the conscious nature of the phenomenon, and on the complex and interrelated information, communication, community, enjoyment, expression and transaction aspects. The blurred distinction between consumers and producers, the relevance of new ICTs and the easy access by virtually anyone to unprecedented amounts of cultural material, all require to be taken into serious consideration by researchers. The Italian National Statistical Institute surveys, covering over 50,000 individuals, represent an interesting case for study purposes and more so in view of the future challenges.

Keywords

Cultural participation Cultural statistics Cultural sector Cultural activities Measures of well-being 

References

  1. Badolato, N., & Scalfaro, A. (2013). L’educazione musicale nella scuola italiana dall’Unità a oggi. Musica Docta, 3(1), 87–99.Google Scholar
  2. Bauman, Z. (1973). Culture as praxis. London: Routledge & K. Paul.Google Scholar
  3. Bergamo, L., & Cicerchia, A. (2014). Measuring well-being: Towards a system of cultural indicators (mimeo).Google Scholar
  4. Cicerchia, A. (2015). Why we should measure, what we should measure. Economia della Cultura, 2, 11–22.Google Scholar
  5. European Commission. (2000). Cultural Statistics in the EU: Final report of the LEG (Eurostat Working Papers: Population and social conditions, 3/2000/E/N°1). Luxembourg: European Commission.Google Scholar
  6. Eurostat. (2012). ESS-net on culture statistics – Final report (Doc.Eurostat /F/12/DSS/01/3.5 EN. Eurostat. Directorate F: Social statistics). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  7. ISTAT. (2015). Annuario statistico italiano 2015. Accessed July 15, 2016, from http://www.istat.it/it/archivio/171864
  8. Kroeber, A., & Kluckhon, C. (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  9. OECD. (2001). Glossary of statistical terms. Accessed July 15, 2016, from http://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=1279
  10. OECD. (2013). OECD skills outlook 2013: First results from the survey of adult skills. OECD Publishing. Accessed January 11, 2015, from  http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264204256-en
  11. OPENCOESIONE. (2016). Verso un migliore uso delle risorse: scopri, segui, sollecita. Accessed October 2, 2016, from http://www.opencoesione.gov.it/
  12. UNESCO. (2009). 2009 UNESCO framework for cultural statistics. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Cultural Statistics.Google Scholar
  13. UNESCO. (2014a). UNESCO culture for development indicators: Methodology manual. Paris: Unesco. Accessed January 11, 2015, from http://en.unesco.org/creativity/system/files/digital-library/CDIS%20Methodology%20Manual.pdf
  14. UNESCO. (2014b). UNESCO culture for development indicators: Implementation toolkit, Paris: Unesco. Accessed January 11, 2015, from http://en.unesco.org/creativity/system/files/digital-library/CDIS%20TOOLKIT.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Italian National Statistical Institute (ISTAT)RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations