Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of Methods and Procedures for Debris-Flow Volume Estimation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Engineering Geology for Society and Territory - Volume 3

Abstract

The estimation of debris-flow volume is a fundamental task for the design of any hazard mitigation intervention in a mountain channel. The estimation may be carried out before the occurrence of a debris flow through methodologies aimed at assessing the debris potential in the basin. It can be carried out through instrumentation deployed along the torrent (stage sensors, geophones, etc.). Finally, volume estimation may be performed after the occurrence of the phenomenon, surveying the deposits left in the channel, in a possible retention basin or on the fan. The surveys can be carried out through a conventional topographic survey, through a terrestrial laser scanner (TLS), by photogrammetric techniques, etc. Each method delivers approximated results, due to different reasons. A systematic comparison of the results of these different estimation procedures, carried out simultaneously in the same catchment, might help to better understand their advantages and limitations, to improve their output and to validate and standardize the respective methodologies. An European Territorial Cooperation project, named SedAlp, has been recently funded by the Alpine Space programme. An important focus of the project is on methods and data collection on sediment transport. In this context, one of the activities that is taking place in a pilot area consists in the comparison of the different methods and procedures for debris-flow volume estimation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arattano M, Franzi L (2004) Analysis of different water-sediment flow processes in a mountain torrent. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 4:783–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arattano M, Franzi L, Marchi L (2006) Influence of rheology on debris flow simulation. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6:519–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arattano M, Conte R, Franzi L, Giordan D, Lazzari A, Luino F (2010) Risk management on an alluvial fan: a case study of the 2008 debris-flow event at Villar Pellice (Piedmont, N-W Italy). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:999–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arattano M, Marchi L, Cavalli M (2012) Analysis of debris flow recordings in an instrumented basin: confirmations and new findings. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:679–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brasington J, Langham J, Rumsby B (2003) Methodological sensitivity of morphometric estimates of coarse fluvial sediment transport. Geomorphology 53:299–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli M, Tarolli P (2011) Application of LiDAR technology for rivers analysis. Italian J Eng Geol Environ Special Issue 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.4408/IJEGE.20

  • Cavalli M, Tarolli P, Marchi L, Dalla Fontana G (2008) The effectiveness of airborne LiDAR data in the recognition of channel-bed morphology. Catena 73(3):249–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Comiti F, Marchi L, Macconi P, Arattano M, Bertoldi G, Borga M, Brardinoni F, Cavalli M, D’Agostino V, Penna D, Theule J (2014)A new monitoring station for debris flows in the European Alps: first observations in the Gadria basin. Nat Hazards (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway SJ, Decaulne A, Balme MR, Murray JB, Towner MC (2010) A new approach to estimating hazard posed by debris flows in the Westfjords of Iceland. Geomorphology 114:556–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Agostino V, Bertoldi G (2014) On the assessment of the management priority of sediment source areas in a debris-flow catchment. Earth Surf Proc Land. doi:10.1002/esp.3518

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Agostino V, Marchi L (2003) Geomorphological estimations of debris flow volumes in alpine basin. In: Proceedings of debris flow hazard mitigation: mechanism, prediction and assessment, pp 1096–1106. Millpress, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungr O, Morgan C, Kellerhals R (1984) Quantitative analysis of debris hazard for design of remedial measures. Can Geotech 21:321–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM, Reid ME, Logan M, LaHusen RG, Godt JW, Griswold JP (2011) Positive feedback and momentum growth during debris flow entrainment of wet bed sediment. Nat Geosci 4:116–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin ML, Wang KL, Huang JJ (2005) Debris flow run off simulation and verification–case study of Chen-You-Lan Watershed, Taiwan. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5(3):439–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Lollino G, Arattano M, Cuccureddu M (2002) The use of the automatic inclinometric system for landslide early warning: the case of Cabella Ligure (North-Western Italy). Phys Chem Earth 27(36):1545–1550

    Google Scholar 

  • Lollino G, Arattano M, Allasia P, Giordan D (2006) Time response of a landslide to meteorological events. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6.2(2006):179–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Milan DJ, Heritage GL, Hetherington D (2007) Application of a 3D laser scanner in the assessment of erosion and deposition volumes and channel change in a proglacial river. Earth Surf Proc Land 32:1657–1674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navratil O, LiĂ©bault F, Bellot H, Travaglini E, Theule JI, Chambon G, Laigle D (2013) High-frequency monitoring of debris-flow propagation along the RĂ©al Torrent, Southern French Prealps. Geomorphology 201:157–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson TC, Costa JE (1987) A rheologic classification of subaerial sediment-water flows. In: Costa JE, Wieczorek GF (eds) Debris flows/avalanches: process, recognition and mitigation. Geol Soc Am Rev Eng Geol 7:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid SC, Lane SN, Berney JM, Holden J (2007) The timing and magnitude of coarse sediment transport events within an upland, temperate gravel-bed river. Geomorphology 83:152–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remaitre A, Malet JP, Maquaire O (2005) Morphology and sedimentology of a complex debris flow in a clay-shale basin. Earth Surf Proc Land 30:339–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schurch P, Densmore AL, Rosser NJ, McArdell BW (2011) Dynamic control on erosion and deposition on debris flow fans. Geol Soc America 39(9):827,830. doi:10.1130/G32103.1

  • Theule JI, LiĂ©bault F, Loye A, Laigle D, Jaboyedoff M (2012) Sediment budget monitoring of debris-flow and bedload transport in the Manival Torrent, SE France. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12:731–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevisani S, Cavalli M, Marchi L (2012) Surface texture analysis of a high-resolution DTM: interpreting an alpine basin. Geomorphology 161:26–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai MP, Hsu YC, Li HC, Shu HM, Liu KF (2011) Application of simulation technique on debris flow hazard zone delineation: a case study in the Daniao tribe, Eastern Taiwan. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11(11):3053–3062

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasklewicz T, Staley DM, Reavis K, Oguchi T (2013) Digital terrain modeling. In: Shroeder JF (ed) Treatise on geomorphology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 130–161

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wheaton JM, Brasington J, Darby SE, Sear DA (2010) Accounting for uncertainty in DEMs from repeat topographic surveys: improved sediment budgets. Earth Surf Proc Land 35:136–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams RD (2012) Section 2.3.2: DEMs of Difference (using DODs to quantify landscape change and uncertainty analysis in DoDs). In: Clarke L (ed) Geomorphological techniques (Online Edition). British Society for Geomorphology, London. ISSN: 2047-0371

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohl EE, Pearthree PP (1991) Debris flows as geomorphic agents in the Huachuca Mountains of southeastern Arizona. Geomorphology 4:273–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is funded by the European Territorial Cooperation Alpine Space Programme 2007–2013—SedAlp project and by the Autonomous Province of Bolzano – Kinoflow project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CNR IRPI, Strada delle Cacce 73, 10135, Turin, Italy

    M. Arattano

  2. CNR-IRPI, Corso Stati Uniti 4, 35127, Padua, Italy

    M. Cavalli

  3. Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Piazza UniversitĂ , 5, 39100, Bolzano, Italy

    F. Comiti & J. Theule

  4. Department TESAF Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020, Legnaro, PD, Italy

    G. Bertoldi & V. D’Agostino

Authors
  1. M. Arattano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Bertoldi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Cavalli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. Comiti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. V. D’Agostino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. Theule
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Arattano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Inst. for Geo-hydrological Protection, National Research Council (CNR), Turin, Italy

    Giorgio Lollino

  2. Inst. for Geo-hydrological Protection, National Research Council (CNR), Turin, Italy

    Massimo Arattano

  3. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

    Massimo Rinaldi

  4. Dept. of Geotechn. Engin. & Geosciences, Technical University of Bari, Bari, Italy

    Orazio Giustolisi

  5. Water, Environment, and Ecotechnologies, French Geological Survey, Montpellier, France

    Jean-Christophe Marechal

  6. Pacific Northwest Research Station Forestry Sciences Laboratory 280, USDA Forest Service, Corvallis, Oregon, USA

    Gordon E. Grant

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Arattano, M., Bertoldi, G., Cavalli, M., Comiti, F., D’Agostino, V., Theule, J. (2015). Comparison of Methods and Procedures for Debris-Flow Volume Estimation. In: Lollino, G., Arattano, M., Rinaldi, M., Giustolisi, O., Marechal, JC., Grant, G. (eds) Engineering Geology for Society and Territory - Volume 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09054-2_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation