Abstract
In brief, inflection point [1.0]—representing the Philosophy of Ageing as a technique for coping with the shortness of life, or the finiteness of time—has been superseded by several new inflection points, with [5.0]—representing Post Ageing, or ageing as an artifact, with an array of bio-technological advancements and interventions in the ageing process as our current temporal setting. Between these two diametrical poles, one quite philosophical and one quite technological, there have been three other inflection points ([2.0], [3.0], and [4.0]). Each inflection point represents a change in direction in the flow of purpose and praxis for what constitutes a dominant theme in conducting inquiry relating to ageing. Many readers will find the heuristic of inflection points to be closely related to other terms that have been used in the history and philosophy of science, such as paradigms, conjectures, exemplars, disciplinary matrix, and the cognitive apparatus of a given scientific community (Conant and Haugeland 2000; Kuhn 1970, 1977; Popper 1963; Suppe 1977). Similarly related has been the use of terms like research programme, research tradition, representational spaces, critical transitions and threshold of epistemologization (Agamben 2009; Hung 2001; Lakatos 1970; Laudan 1984; Scheffer 2009).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Achenbaum, A. (1995). Crossing frontiers: Gerontology emerges as a science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Achenbaum, W. A. (2009). A metahistorical perspective on theories of ageing. In V. L. Bengston, D. Gans, N. M. Putney, & M. Silverstein (Eds.), Handbook of the theories of ageing (2nd ed., pp. 25–38). New York: Springer.
Adler, F. R. (2012). Modeling the dynamics of life: Calculus and probability for life scientists (3rd ed.). Independence: Cengage Learning.
Agamben, G. (2009). The signature of all things. New York: Zone Books.
Aldwin, C., & Gilmer, D. (2013). Health, illness, and optimal ageing: Biological and psychosocial perspectives. New York: Springer.
Alkema, G., & Alley, D. (2006). Gerontology’s future: An integrative model for disciplinary advancement. Gerontologist, 46, 574–582.
Alley, D., Putney, N., Rice, M., & Bengtson, V. L. (2010). The increasing use of theory in social gerontology: 1990–2004. Journal of Gerontology; Social Sciences, 65B(5), 583–590.
Arendt, H. (2013). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Baltes, P. B., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1984). Paradigm lost and paradigm regained: Critique of dannefer’s portrayal of the life span. American Sociological Review, 49(6), 841–847.
Bass, S. (2006). Gerontological theory: The search for the holy grail. Gerontologist, 46, 139–143.
Bass, S. A. (2009). Toward an integrative theory of social gerontology. In V. Bengtson, M. Silverstein, N. Putney, & D. Gans (Eds.), Handbook of theories of ageing (2nd ed., pp. 347–374). New York: Springer.
Bass, S. A., & Ferraro, K. (2000). Gerontology education in transition: Considering disciplinary and paradigmatic evolution. Gerontologist, 40(1), 97–106.
Bengtson, V. L., & Schaie, K. W. (1999). Handbook of theories of ageing. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Bengtson, V. L., Rice, C. J., & Johnson, M. L. (1999). Are theories of ageing important? Models and explanations in gerontology at the turn of the century. In V. L. Bengtson & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the theories of ageing. New York: Springer.
Bengtson, V. L., Putney, N. M., & Johnson, M. (2005). Ch. 1.2. Are theories of ageing necessary? In M. Johnson, V. L. Bengtson, P. Coleman, & T. Kirkwood, (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of age and ageing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bengtson, V. L., Gans, D., Putney, N., & Silverstein, M. (2009). Handbook of theories of ageing. New York: Springer Publishing.
Bhopal, R. (1999). Paradigms in epidemiology textbooks: In the footsteps of Thomas Kuhn. American Journal of Public Health, 89(8), 1162–1165.
Biggs, S., Lowenstein, A., & Hendricks, J. (2003). The need for theory in gerontology. In S. Biggs, A. Lowenstein, & J. Hendricks (Eds.), The need for theory: Critical approaches to social gerontology (pp. 1–14). New York: Baywood.
Blackmore, S. (2004). Consciousness: An introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Boghossian, P. (2006). Fear of knowledge: Against relativism and constructivism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bowling, A. (2007). Aspirations for older age in the 21st century: What is successful ageing? International Journal of Human Development, 64(3), 263–297.
Brient, E. (2001). From vita contemplativa to vita activa: Modern instrumentalization of theory and the problem of measure. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 9, 19–40.
Brockman, J. (1995). The third culture: Beyond the scientific revolution. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Butler, R. (2008). The longevity revolution: The benefits and challenges of living a long life. New York: Public Affairs.
Caneva, K. (2000). Possible Kuhns in the history of science: Anomalies of incommensurable paradigms. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 31(1), 87–124.
Carpi, M., Salvioli, S., Monti, D., Caruso, C., Candore, G., & Vasto, S. (2008). Human longevity within an evolutionary perspective: The peculiar paradigm of a post-reproductive genetics. Experimental Gerontology, 43, 53–60.
Carvalho, J. (2006). Overview of the structure of a scientific worldview. Zygon, 41(1), 113–124.
Chapin, R., & Cox, E. O. (2001). Changing the paradigm: Strengths-based and empowerment-oriented social work with frail elders. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 36(3/4), 165–179.
Charness, N. (2004). Preface. In D. C. Brudick, & S. Kwon. (Eds.), Gerotechnology: Research and practice in technology and ageing (pp. xxv). New York: Springer.
Cole, T. R. (1992). The journey of life: A cultural history of ageing in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cole, T. R., Ray, R., & Kastenbaum, R. (2010). A guide to humanistic studies in ageing. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Conant, J., & Haugeland, J. (2000). The road since structure: Philosophical essays, 1970–1993 with an autobiographical interview. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Costa, G. D. N. (Trans.). (2005). Seneca: On the shortness of life. New York: Penguin Books. (Original work published 56 A. D.).
Critser, G. (2010). Eternity soup: Inside the quest to end ageing. New York: Harmony Books.
Cutler, S. (2005). Ageism and technology. Generations, 23(3), 67–72.
Cutler, S. (2006). Technological change and ageing. In R. Binstock & L. George (Eds.), Handbook of ageing and the social sciences (6th ed., pp. 257–276). San Diego: Academic Press.
Dannefer, D., & Daub, A. (2009). Extending the interrogation: Life span, life course, and the constitution of human ageing. Advances in Life Course Research, 14, 15–27.
Dawkins, R. (2009). The greatest show on earth: the evidence for evolution. New York: Free Press.
Diewald, M., & Mayer, K. U. (2009). The sociology of the life course and life span psychology: Integrated paradigm or complementing pathways? Advances in Life Course Research, 14, 5–14.
Dillaway, H., & Byrnes, M. (2009). Reconsidering successful ageing: A call for renewed and expanded academic critiques and conceptualizations. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 28(6), 702–722.
Ferrario, C. G., Freeman, F. J., Nellet, G., & Scheel, J. (2008). Changing nursing student’s attitudes about ageing: An argument for the successful ageing paradigm. Educational Gerontology, 34(1), 51–66.
Ferraro, K. (2006). Imagining the disciplinary advancement of gerontology: Whither the tipping point? The Gerontologist, 46, 571–573.
Garreau, J. (2005). Radical evolution: The promise and peril of enhancing our minds, our bodies—and What It means to be human. New York: Broadway (Random House).
Gay, V. (2010). Progress and values in the humanities: comparing culture and science. New York: Columbia University Press.
Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Rationality for mortals: How people cope with uncertainty. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gigerenzer, G., Czerlinski, J., & Martignon, L. (2002). How good are fast and frugal heuristics? In T. Gilovich, D. Griggin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 559–581). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gill, C. (2013). Marcus Aurelius: Meditations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Groner, R., Groner, M., & Bischof, W. F. (Eds.). (1983). Methods of heuristics. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Haber, D. (2009). Gerontology: Adding an empowerment paradigm. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 28(3), 283–297.
Hendricks, J., & Achenbaum, W. A. (1999). Historical development of theories of ageing. In V. L. Bengtson & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of theories of ageing (pp. 21–39). New York: Springer Publishing.
Hung, E. H. (2001). Kuhnian paradigms as representational spaces: New perspectives on the problems of incommensurability, scientific explanation, and physical necessity. Internal Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 15(3), 275–292.
Inui, T. S. (2003). The need for an integrated biopsychological approach to research on successful ageing. Annals of Internal Medicine, 139, 391–394.
Kagan, J. (2009). The three cultures: Natural sciences, social sciences, and the humanities in the 21st century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Katz, S. (1996). Disciplining old age: The formation of gerontological knowledge. Charlottesville: The University Press of Virginia.
Katz, J. E. (Ed.). (2003).Machines that become us: The social context of interpersonal communication technologies. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Kaye, L. W., Butler, S. S., & Webster, N. M. (2003). Toward a productive ageing paradigm for geriatric practice. Ageing International, 28(2), 200–213.
Krueger, A. B. (2009). Measuring the subjective well-being of nations: National accounts of time use and well-being. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1977). the essential tension: selected studies in scientific Tradition and change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (2000). The road since structure. Philosophical essays 1970–1993. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Laudan, L. (1984). Science and values. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lehrer, J. (2009). How we decide. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Marsh, B., Todd, P. M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Cognitive heuristics: Reasoning the fast and frugal way. In J. Leighton & R. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of reasoning (pp. 273–287). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayo, D. (1996). Ducks, rabbits, and normal science: Recasting the kuhn’s-eye view of popper’s demarcation of science. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 47(2), 271–290.
Mayr, E. (1994). The advance of science and scientific revolutions. Journal of the History of Behavioral Sciences, 30, 328–334.
O’Donohue, W. (1992). Is gerontology a branch of astrology? The role of advanced age in scientific explanation. New Ideas in Psychology, 10(3), 321–329.
O’Donohue, W. (1993). The spell of Kuhn on psychology: An exegetical elixir. Philosophical Psychology, 6(3), 267–288.
Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Powell, J. L. (2009). Social theory, and health and welfare professionals: A Foucauldian, “toolkit”. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 28(6), 669–682.
Radder, H. (1997). Philosophy and history of science: Beyond the Kuhnian paradigm. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 28(4), 633–655.
Ramachandran, V. S. (2004). A brief Tour of human consciousness. New York: PI Press.
Read, C. Y., Green, R. C., & Smyer, M. A. (Eds.). (2008). Ageing, biotechnology, and the future. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Rickman, H. (2004). The riddle of the sphinx: Interpreting the human world. Cranbury: Associated University Presses.
Roberts, M. J. (2004). Heuristics and reasoning I: Making deduction simple. In J. Leighton & R. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of reasoning (pp. 234–272). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1998). Successful ageing. New York: Pantheon Books.
Scheffer, M. (2009). Critical transitions in nature and society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Schmidt, L. K. (2006). Understanding hermeneutics. Stocksfield: Acumen.
Settersten, R. (2006). Ageing and the life course. In R. Binstock, & L. George (Eds.), Handbook of ageing and the social sciences (pp. 3–20). New York: Academic Press.
Settersten, R. A. (2009). It takes two to tango: The (un)easy dance between life-course sociology and life-span psychology. Advances in Life Course Research, 14, 74–81.
Shapin, S. (2010). Never pure: Historical studies of people as if it was produced by people with bodies, situated in time, space, culture, and society, and struggling for credibility and authority. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Shenk, D.,Rowles, G.,Peacock, J. R.,Mitchell, J.,Fisher, B. J.,Moore, K. S., & Hare, L. (2001). Teaching research in gerontology: toward a cumulative model. Educational Gerontology, (27)7, 537–556.
Sherraden, M., Morrow-Howell, N., Hinterlong, J., & Rozario, P. (2001). Productive ageing: Theoretical choices and directions. In N. Morrow-Howell, J. Hinterlong, & M. Sherraden (Eds.), Productive ageing: Concerns and challenges (pp. 260–284). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Slingerland, E. (2008). What science offers the humanities: Integrating body and culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Snow, C. P. (1964). The two cultures and a second look: An expanded version of the two cultures and the scientific revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press (Canto Edition).
Sokal, A., & Bricmont, J. (1998). Fashionable nonsense: Postmodern intellectuals’ abuse of science. New York: Picador.
Sophocles (2005). Oedipus at Colonus. (E. Grennan & M. R. Kitzinger, Trans.). New York: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 401 B.C.).
Stanner, S., Thompson, R., & Buttriss, J. L. (2009). Healthy ageing: The role of nutrition and lifestyle. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Suppe, F. (1977). The structure of scientific theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Tauber, A. I. (2009). Science and the quest for meaning. Waco: Baylor University Press.
Valliant, G. (2002). Ageing well: Surprising guideposts to a happier life from the landmark harvard study of adult development. Boston: Little Brown.
Von Dietze, E. (2001). Paradigms explained: Rethinking Thomas Kuhn’s philosophy of science. Westport: Praeger.
Weaver, J. W. (1999). Gerontology education: A new paradigm for the 21st century. Educational Gerontology, 25, 479–490.
Weaver, K., & Olson, J. (2006). Understanding paradigms used for nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(4), 459–469.
Weisstein, E. W. (2009). Inflection point. From MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource. Retrieved from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/InflectionPoint.html.
Wilmoth, J., & Ferraro, K. (2007). The fountain of gerontological discovery. In J. Wilmoth & K. Ferraro (Eds.), Gerontology: Perspectives and issues (3rd ed., pp. 3–12). New York: Springer Publishing.
Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Wimsatt, W. C. (2007). Re-Engineering philosophy for limited beings: Piecewise approximations to reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wright, S. D. (2008). Life in the long lane—a review essay on the longevity revolution: The benefits and challenges of living a long life by Robert N. Butler. Journal of the American Heart Association, 2(3/4), 298–313.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Felsted, K.F., Wright, S.D. (2014). The Use of Inflection Points. In: Toward Post Ageing. Healthy Ageing and Longevity, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09051-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09051-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09050-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09051-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)