Skip to main content

Key Words Related to the Team’s Work with the Students

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Language and Discourse in Special Education
  • 707 Accesses

Abstract

The first part of the chapter deals with the key words identified in the language used by the (a) therapists, (b) teachers, and (c) doctors and examines the significance of these key words in their world. This chapter presents and seeks to reveal the conceptual meanings of these key words and to investigate the interdisciplinary team’s use of the words and the meanings that they attach to them. The key words are described in terms of: the paradigm level, the category level, the class level, and the cluster level. The second part presents what can be learned from the key words; it reveals that professionals who work in a special education school often experience situations of crisis and feelings of discontent. The cooperation of the students is the primary goal of the professionals, and they work hard to attain it. Professionals use five main ways to achieve the desired cooperation of their students, and between these worlds of content, there is a transferability sequence regarding the key words within the interdisciplinary discourse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arieli, M. (1995). Teaching and its discontents. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University, Ramot Press. (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1993). Studying the thinking society: Social representations, rhetoric, and attitudes. In G. Breakwell & D. Canter (Eds.), Empirical approaches to social representations (pp. 39–62). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1973). I and thou (Besod Siach). Jerusalem: Bialik Institute. (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, P., & Sorjonen, M. L. (1997). Institutional dialogue. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction. Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elizur, A., Tyano, S., Munitz, H., & Neumann, M. (1994). Selected chapters in psychiatry (2nd ed.). Tel Aviv: Papyros. (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, C., & Wierzbicka, A. (1997). Discourse and culture. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction. Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, E. (1997). Discourse and language education (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (1978). Toward a theory of classroom coping strategies. In L. Barton & R. Meighan (Eds.), Sociological interpretations of schooling and classrooms. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurford, J. R., & Heasley, B. (1983). Semantics: A coursebook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kainan, A. (1996). The staff room: Observing the professional culture of teachers. Beer Sheba: Ben-Gurion University. (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, B. (2008). Discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, R., Millham, S., & Bullock, R. (1970). Manual on the sociology of the school. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linell, P. (1998). Discourse across boundaries: On recontextualisation and the blending of voices in professional discourse. Text: An Interdisciplinary. Journal for the Study of Discourse, 18(2), 143–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumby, D. K., & Clair, R. P. (1997). Organizational discourse. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction. Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Open University. (1990). Issues in special education: An introduction to special education (Unit 1 and Unit 11). Tel Aviv: Open University. (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, A. (1982). A model of coping strategies. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 3(2), 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reber, S. A. (1992). Dictionary of psychology. Tel Aviv: Keter. (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenheim, A. (1990). Man meets himself—Psychotherapy: The experience and its processes. Tel Aviv: Shocken. (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Discourse as social interaction. Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iris Manor-Binyamini .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Manor-Binyamini, I. (2015). Key Words Related to the Team’s Work with the Students. In: Language and Discourse in Special Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09024-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics