Skip to main content

Introduction and disease overview

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Incretin-based Therapies in Type 2 Diabetes
  • 522 Accesses

Abstract

The term ‘epidemic’ has evolved dramatically from its first use by Homer and Hippocrates, through the Middle Ages when it defined the rapid propagation of diseases like the plague, to the 19th century when it was used to describe infectious diseases, and later in the 20th century where the term is applied to noninfectious diseases such as obesity and type 2 diabetes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Martin PMV, Martin-Granel E. 2,500-year evolution of the term epidemic. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006:12:976-980. wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/12/6/pdfs/05-1263.pdf. Accessed January 5, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  2. International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes: facts and figures. www.idf.org/worlddiabetesday/toolkit/gp/facts-figures. Accessed October 5, 2015.

  3. DeFronzo RA. From the triumvirate to the ominous octet: a new paradigm for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes. 2009;58:773-795.

    Google Scholar 

  4. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes 2014. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(suppl 1):S14-S80.

    Google Scholar 

  5. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352:837-853.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1577-1589.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Duckworth W, Abraira C, Moritz T, et al; VADT Investigators. Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:129-139.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J, et al. ADVANCE Collaborative Group. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2560-2572.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP, et al. Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study Group. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2545-2559.

    Google Scholar 

  10. International Diabetes Federation (IDF). IDF Clinical Guidelines: Global Guidelines for Type 2 Diabetes. 2011/2012. www.idf.org/guidelines. Accessed October 5, 2015.

  11. Handelsman Y, Machanick JI, Blonde L, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for developing a diabetes mellitus comprehensive care plan. AACE Diabetes Care Plan Guidelines. Endocr Pract. 2011;17(suppl 2):1-53. www.aace.com/files/dm-guidelines-ccp.pdf. Accessed October 5, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Campbell JE, Drucker DJ. Pharmacology, physiology, and mechanisms of incretin hormone action. Cell Metab. 2013;17:819-837.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Scirica BM1, Bhatt DL, Braunwald E, et al. The design and rationale of the saxagliptin assessment of vascular outcomes recorded in patients with diabetes mellitus-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (SAVOR-TIMI) 53 study. Am Heart J. 2011;162:818-825.

    Google Scholar 

  14. White WB, Bakris GL, Bergenstal RM, et al. EXamination of cArdiovascular outcoMes with alogliptin versus standard of carE in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome (EXAMINE): a cardiovascular safety study of the dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor alogliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes with acute coronary syndrome. Am Heart J. 2011;162:620-626.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Green JB, Bethel MA, Paul SK, et al. Rationale, design, and organization of a randomized, controlled Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes with Sitagliptin (TECOS) in patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J. 2013;166:983-989.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes After Acute Coronary Syndrome During Treatment With AVE0010 (Lixisenatide) (ELIXA). http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01147250. Accessed October 5, 2015.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mudaliar, S., Henry, R.R. (2016). Introduction and disease overview. In: Gough, S. (eds) Handbook of Incretin-based Therapies in Type 2 Diabetes. Adis, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08982-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08982-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Adis, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08981-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08982-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics