Abstract
Action verbs are the less predictable linguistic type for bilingual dictionaries and they cause major problems for MT technologies that are immediately evident to the user. This is not only because of language specific phraseology, but is rather a consequence of the peculiar way each natural language categorizes events i.e. it is a consequence of semantic factors. In ordinary languages the most frequent Action verbs are “general”, since they extend productively to actions belonging to different ontological types. Moreover, each language categorizes action in its own way and therefore the cross-linguistic reference to everyday activities is puzzling. But the actual variation of verbs across action types is largely unknown. This paper sketches the problem constituted by the Ontology of Action when disambiguation and cross-linguistic reference to action is concerned and presents the IMAGACT Ontology Infrastructure, which aims at filling this gap by exploiting multilingual spoken corpora.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baker, C.F., Fillmore, C.J., Lowe, J.B.: The Berkeley FrameNet project. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL 1998). Montreal, Canada (1998)
Brown, S.W., Rood, T., Palmer, M.: Number or nuance: which factors restrict reliable word sense annotation? In: Calzolari, N. (ed.) Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language resources and Evaluation, pp. 3237–3243. ELRA, Paris (2010)
Fellbaum, Ch. (ed.): WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)
Fillmore, ChJ, Atkins, B.T.S.: Towards a frame-based organization of the lexicon: the semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In: Lehrer, A., Kittay, E.F. (eds.) Frames, Fields, and Contrasts. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey (1992)
Givon, T.: Prototypes: between Plato and Wittgenstein. In: Craig, C. (ed.) Noun Classes and Categorization, pp. 77–102. Beniamin, Amsterdam (1986)
Kipper-Schuler, K.: VerbNet: a broad-coverage, comprehensive verb lexicon. Ph.D. thesis. Computer and Information Science Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (2005)
Kopecka, A., Narasimhan, B.: Events of Putting and Taking, A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Benjamins, Amsterdam (2012)
Korzen, I.: Endocentric and esocentric languages in translation. Perspect. Stud. Translatol. 13(1), 21–37 (2005)
Levin, B.: English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1993)
Majid, A., Boster, J.S., Bowerman, M.: The cross-linguistic categorization of everyday events: a study of cutting and breaking. Cognition 109, 235–250 (2008)
Moneglia, M., Panunzi, A.: Action predicates and the ontology of action across spoken language corpora. The basic issue of the SEMACT project. In: Alcántara, M., Declerck, T. (eds.) Proceeding of the International Workshop on the Semantic Representation of Spoken Language (SRSL7), pp. 51–58. Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca (2007)
Moneglia, M., Monachini, M., Calabrese, O., Panunzi, A., Frontini, F., Gagliardi, G., Russo, I.: The IMAGACT cross-linguistic ontology of action. A new infrastructure for natural language disambiguation. In: Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Declerck, T., Doğan, M.U., Maegaard, B., Mariani, J., Odijk, J., Piperidis, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’12), 2606–2613. ELRA, Paris (2012a)
Moneglia, M., Gagliardi, G., Panunzi, A., Frontini, F., Russo, I., Monachini, M.: IMAGACT: deriving an action ontology from spoken corpora. Paper Presented at the 8th Joint ACL - ISO Workshop on Interoperable Semantic Annotation (ISA-8), Pisa, 3–5 October 2012 (2012b)
Ng, H.T., Lim, C.Y., Foo, S.K: A case study on inter-annotator agreement for word sense disambiguation. In: Proceedings of the ACL SIGLEX Workshop on Standardizing Lexical Resources (SIGLEX99), College Park, MD, pp. 9–13 (1999)
Palmer, M., Gildea, D., Kingsbury, P.: The proposition bank: an annotated corpus of semantic roles. Comput. Linguist. 31(1), 71–106 (2005)
Talmy, L.: Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical form. In: Shopen, T. (ed.) Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985)
Wittgenstein, L.: Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell, Oxford (1953)
IMAGACT.: (2013). http://www.imagact.it
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Moneglia, M. (2014). Natural Language Ontology of Action: A Gap with Huge Consequences for Natural Language Understanding and Machine Translation. In: Vetulani, Z., Mariani, J. (eds) Human Language Technology Challenges for Computer Science and Linguistics. LTC 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8387. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08958-4_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08958-4_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08957-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08958-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)