Skip to main content

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Proximal Humerus Fractures
  • 1826 Accesses

Abstract

Displaced fractures involving the proximal humerus in the elderly population may be difficult to treat with standard methods available. Percutaneous pinning, Open Reduction, and Internal Fixation may not be sufficient secondary to the bone quality. Hemiarthroplasty in this age group has been only moderately successful mostly secondary to underlying rotator cuff problems or failure of the tuberosities to heal. Reverse Total Shoulder replacement has become a common treatment option in the elderly age group with either weakened bone quality or underlying rotator cuff dysfunction. Early outcome studies have revealed a better functional result and better pain relief than hemiarthroplasty in the elderly population with similar complication rates reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lugli T. Artificial joint by Pean (1893): the facts of unexceptional intervention and the prosthetic method. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978;133(2):15–218.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Banks MJ, Emory RJH. Pioneers of shoulder replacement: Themistocles Gluck and Jule Emile Pean. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995;4(4):259–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gross RM. History of total shoulder arthroplasty. In: Crosby LA, editor. Total shoulder arthroplasty. 1st ed. Rosemont, IL: AAOS; 2000. p. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Neer II CS. Replacement arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56(1):1–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nyffeler RW, Werner CM, Gerber C. Biomechanical relevance of glenoid component positioning in the reverse Delta III total shoulder prosthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14:524–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Simovitch RW, Zumstein MA, Lohri E, Helmy N, Gerber C. Predictors of scapular notching in patients managed with the Delta III reverse total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:588–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Grammont P, Trouilloud P, Laffay JP, Deries X. Concept study and realization of a new total shoulder prosthesis [French]. Rhumatologie. 1987;39:407–18.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chalmers PN, et al. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fracture: comparison to open reduction-internal fixation and hemiarthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2013.07.044.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lanting B, MacDermid J, Drosdowech D, Faber KJ. Proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of treatment modalities. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(1):42–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim SH, Szabo RM, Marder RA. Epidemiology of humerus fractures in the United States: nationwide emergency department sample, 2008. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64(3):407–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gallinet D, Clappaz P, Garbuio P, Tropet Y, Obert L. Three or four parts complex proximal humerus fractures: hemiarthroplasty versus reverse prosthesis: a comparative study of 40 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95:48–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Neer II CS. Displaced proximal humerus fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52(6):1077–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Neer II CS. Displaced proximal humerus fractures II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52(6):1090–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lehman C, Cuomo F, Kummer FJ, Zuckerman JD. The incidence of full thickness rotator cuff tears in a large cadaveric population. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1995;54(1):30–1.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Namdari S, et al. Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:1701–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gerber C, Pennington D, Nyffeler R. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009;17:284–95.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Crane JK, Hohman DW, Nodzo SR, Duquin TR. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Propionibacterium acnes isolates from shoulder surgery. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(7):3424–6. doi:10.1128/AAC.00463-13. Epub 2013 Apr.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Molé D, Favard L. Excentered scapulohumeral osteoarthritis [French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007;93(6 Suppl):37–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hansen ML, Otis JC, Johnson JS, Cordasco FA, Craig EV, Warren RF. Biomechanics of massive rotator cuff tears: implications for treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(2):316–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Iannotti JP, Gabriel JP, Schneck SL, et al. The normal glenohumeral relationships. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:491–500.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Greiner SH, Diederichs G, Kroning I, Scheibel M, Perka C. Tuberosity position correlates with fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff after hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(3):431–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L, Walch G, Coste JS, Male D. Tuberosity, malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11(5):401–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gallinet D, Adam A, Gasse N, Rochet S, Obert L. Improvement in shoulder rotation in complex shoulder fractures treated by reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22(1):38–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Guery J, Favard L, Sirveaux F, Oudet D, Mole D, Walch G. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty survivorship analysis of eighty replacements followed for five to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(8):1742–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynn A. Crosby .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crosby, L.A., Anderton, T. (2015). Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures. In: Crosby, L., Neviaser, R. (eds) Proximal Humerus Fractures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08951-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08951-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08950-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08951-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics