Skip to main content

Decision Making for Disaster Risk Management in a Changing Climate

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Natural Disasters and Climate Change

Abstract

The uncertainty in future climate conditions means that new decision-making approaches need to be mobilized. This chapter highlights strategies that are best able to cope with the large uncertainty (and disagreement) that surround the climate change impacts on natural hazards and disasters. It introduces the robust decision-making approach and suggests flexible and reversible strategies that are best suited to the current situation of high uncertainty on future climates. These approaches can be used to improve risk management, and capture the potential synergies between risk management and climate change adaptation.

Part of this chapter is based on Hallegatte (2009), published in Global Environmental Change, and Hallegatte et al. (2012).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Because a robust decision-making process can take the result of a cost-benefit analysis as an input, it should not be considered as an alternative to the cost-benefit analysis, but as a complement.

References

  • Dessai S, Hulme M, Lempert R, Pielke R Jr (2009) Climate prediction: a limit to adaptation? In: Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O’Brien KL (eds) Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 64–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Fankhauser S (1994) Protection vs. retreat – the economic costs of sea level rise. Environ Plan A 27:299–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fankhauser S, Smith JB, Tol RSJ (1999) Weathering climate change: some simple rules to guide adaptation decisions. Ecol Econ 30(1):67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves DG, Lempert RJ (2007) A new analytic method for finding policy-relevant scenarios. Glob Environ Chang 17:73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves DG, Knopman D, Lempert R, Berry S, Wainfan L (2007) Presenting uncertainty about climate change to water resource managers—summary of workshops with the inland empire utilities agency. RAND, Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha-Duong M (1998) Quasi-option value and climate policy choices. Energy Econ 20:599–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall JW (2007) Probabilistic climate scenarios may misrepresent uncertainty and lead to bad adaptation decisions. Hydrol Process 21(8):1127–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallegatte S (2009) Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change. Glob Environ Chang 19:240–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallegatte S, Shah A, Brown C, Lempert R, Gill S (2012) Investment decision making under deep uncertainty–application to climate change. World Bank Policy Research working paper 6193. Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson S, Nicholls R, Ranger N, Hallegatte S, Corfee-Morlot J, Herweijer C, Chateau J (2011) A global ranking of port cities with high exposure to climate extremes. Clim Chang 104(1):89–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lempert RJ, Collins MT (2007) Managing the risk of uncertain thresholds responses: comparison of robust, optimum, and precautionary approaches. Risk Anal 27:1009–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lempert RJ, Groves DG, Popper SW, Bankes SC (2006) A general, analytic method for generating robust strategies and narrative scenarios. Manag Sci 52(4):514–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lempert RJ, Kalra N, Peyraud S, Mao Z (2013) Ensuring robust flood risk management in Ho Chi Minh City: a robust decision making demonstration. World Bank Policy Research working paper 6465. Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lothian A (2006) Coastal landscape assessment. In: Coast to coast conference, Melbourne, 23 May 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Milly PCD, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M, Hirsch RM, Kundzewicz ZW, Lettenmaier DP, Stouffer RJ (2008) Climate change: stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science 319(5863):573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls R, Leatherman S (1996) Adapting to sea-level rise: relative sea-level trends to 2100 for the United States. Coast Manag 24(4):301–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz P (1996) The art of the long view. Double Day, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hallegatte, S. (2014). Decision Making for Disaster Risk Management in a Changing Climate. In: Natural Disasters and Climate Change. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08933-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics