Abstract
The following chapter explores the potential differences in access to venture capital between serial entrepreneurs (who have founded several businesses, either one after the other or simultaneously) and new entrepreneurs (who launch a business for the first time). While empirical results differ regarding the outperformance of serial entrepreneurs compared to that of new entrepreneurs, numerous examples seem to suggest that serial entrepreneurs have easier access to venture capital. We can explain this paradox by drawing on organisational theory. Entrepreneurial experience, which could be considered as a form of entrepreneurial training, gives the serial entrepreneur an advantage since he or she has both more human capital (experience) and social capital (network) than a new entrepreneur, advantages that are liable to give the entrepreneur easier access to venture capital. Empirical studies indicate that experienced entrepreneurs tend to have faster access to funds, and receive larger sums than new entrepreneurs. However, studies are less conclusive when we investigate the higher valuation of serial entrepreneurs’ businesses compared to that of new entrepreneurs.
Venture capital (VC) is a key source of funding for new businesses, especially firms based on the immaterial or intellectual property (Hsu 2007). The figures show that successful access to venture capital financing is very low, around 3–5 % (Shane and Stuart 2002). Yet, in a context of capital rationing, some entrepreneurs seem to find it easier to finance their new venture than others. These are “serial entrepreneurs,” in other words, entrepreneurs who have already launched one or more businesses in the past. Examples include entrepreneurs such as the American Jim Clark, the Dane Janus Friis and his Swedish partner Niklas Zennström, or French entrepreneur Marc Simoncini, who all have multiple business ventures under their belt, on each occasion managing to raise funds through venture capital. These observations raise certain issues, especially since the potential outperformance of businesses launched by serial entrepreneurs compared to other firms has not been clearly proven, and findings from studies conducted in this area are generally inconclusive (Gompers et al. 2006).
This gives rise to a two questions. Without empirical proof to determine which of the two cases achieves better operational performance, why do serial entrepreneurs benefit from easier access to capital venture financing? Aside from the anecdotal examples above, has such privileged access to venture capital been confirmed by empirical studies based on statistically relevant samples?
This paper attempts to answer the following questions: first, are there any elements in entrepreneurial theory that can explain the apparent advantages of serial entrepreneurs when seeking access to venture capital? Secondly, can this assumed advantage be confirmed by entrepreneurial practice?
The question is of interest for a number of theoretical and practical reasons. At theoretical level, putting the issue of how serial entrepreneurs obtain seed capital into perspective requires an understanding of the way investors manage the selection process of funding applications, as well as an analysis of entrepreneurial characteristics and the impact of the latter on their potential to acquire funding. From a practical standpoint, the question of serial entrepreneurs’ potentially easier access to venture capital has thrown up some major issues, insofar as nascent businesses that seek this type of funding mostly belong to sectors where swift development is a key asset.
Our paper is organised as follows. We explore the theoretical reasons that underlie why serial entrepreneurs may be able to access venture capital more easily than others. The awarding of venture capital takes place within a context of information asymmetry. To counteract this problem, contractual solutions can be brought into play, but the relation of trust between investor and entrepreneur is also likely to be important. In this regard, previous entrepreneurial experience, likened to entrepreneurial learning, provides a means to increase the entrepreneur’s human and social capital, giving the serial entrepreneur an advantage when it comes to raising capital. Finally, we examine the findings of empirical studies conducted to determine whether serial entrepreneurs benefit from preferential access to venture capital. We successively consider the possible differences in the way they are treated, depending on whether the company was founded by a serial entrepreneur or not, how quickly the funds are raised, the amounts awarded, and the valuations obtained.
Keywords
- Social Capital
- Venture Capital
- Information Asymmetry
- Venture Capital Investment
- Venture Capital Financing
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Alvarez SA, Barney JB (2004) Organizing rent generation and appropriation: toward a theory of the entrepreneurial firm. J Bus Ventur 19(5):621–635
Amit R, Glosten L, Muller E (1990) Entrepreneurial ability, venture investments, and risk sharing. Manag Sci 38:1232–1245
Becker GS (1975) Human capital. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Burt R (1992) Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Boston
Bygrave W, Timmon J (1992) Venture capital at the cross roads. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol 94:195–210
Cope J (2005) Toward a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrep Theory Pract 29(4):373–397
Cornelli F, Yosha O (1997) Stage financing and the role of convertible debt. London Business School working paper no 253-1997. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=48581
Davidsson P, Honig B (2003) The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. J Bus Ventur 18(3):301–332
Evans DS, Leighton LS (1989) Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. Am Econ Rev 79:519–535
Florin J, Lubatkin M, Schulze W (2003) A social capital model of high-growth ventures. Acad Manage J 46(3):374–385
Fried VH, Hisrich RD (1994) Toward a model of venture capital investment decision making. Finan Manag 23:28–37
Gartner WB (1988) Who is an entrepreneur? Is the wrong question. Am J Small Bus 12(4):11–32
Gimeno J, Folta T, Cooper A, Woo C (1997) Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Adm Sci Q 42:750–783
Gompers P, Lerner J (2000) Money chasing deals? The impact of fund inflows on private equity valuations. J Finan Econ 55:281–325
Gompers P, Kovner A, Lerner J, Scharfstein D (2006) Skill vs. luck in entrepreneurship and venture capital: evidence from serial entrepreneurs. NBER working paper no. 12592
Harvey M, Evans R (1995) Strategic windows in the entrepreneurial process. J Bus Ventur 10:331–347
Hellmann T, Puri M (2002) Venture capital and the professionalization of start-up firms: empirical evidence. J Finance 57:169–197
Hisrich RD, Jankowitz AD (1990) Intuition in venture capital decisions: an exploratory study using a new technique. J Bus Ventur 5(1):49–62
Hoang H, Antoncic B (2003) Network-based research in entrepreneurship: a critical review. J Bus Ventur 18(2):165–188
Hochberg YV, Ljungqvist A, Lu Y (2007) Venture capital networks and investment performance. J Finance 62(1):251–301
Hsu DH (2004) What do entrepreneurs pay for venture capital affiliation? J Finance 59(4):1805–1844
Hsu DH (2007) Experienced entrepreneurial founders and venture capital funding. Res Policy 36:722–741
Hutt RW, Thomas B (1985) Venture capital in Arizona. Front Entrep Res. Proceedings of the Babson Research Conference, 155–169
Kaplan S, Strömberg P (2004) Contracts, characteristics, and actions: evidence from venture capitalist analyses. J Finance 59(5):2177–2210
Leland HE, Pyle DH (1977) Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation. J Finance 32(2):371–387
Lin N, Ensel W, Vaughn J (1981) Social resources and strength of ties: structural factors in occupational status attainment. Am Sociol Rev 46(4):393–405
MacMillan IC (1986) To really learn about entrepreneurship, let’s study habitual entrepreneurs. J Bus Ventur 1:241–243
Minniti M, Bygrave W (2001) A dynamic model of entrepreneurial learning. Entrep Theory Pract 25(3):5–16
Politis D (2005) The process of entrepreneurial learning: a conceptual framework. Entrep Theor Pract 29(4):399–424
Shane S, Cable D (2002) Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Manag Sci 48(3):364–381
Shane S, Stuart T (2002) Organisational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Manag Sci 48(1):154–170
Shane S, Venkataraman S (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad Manage Rev 25(1):217–226
Shepherd DA, Zacharakis A (1999) Conjoint analysis: a new methodology for researching the decision policies of venture capitalists. Venture Cap 1:197–217
Snell SA, Dean JW (1992) Integrated manufacturing and human resource management: a human capital perspective. Acad Manage J 35(3):467–504
Sorenson O, Stuart TE (2001) Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. Am J Sociol 106:1546–1586
Spence AM (1974) Market signaling: informational transfer in hiring and related screening processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Trester J (1998) Venture capital contracting under asymmetric information. J Bank Finance 22(6–8):675–699
Wiklund J, Shepherd DA (2008) Portfolio entrepreneurship: habitual and novice founders, new entry, and mode of organizing. Entrep Theory Pract 32(4):701–725
Wright M, Robbie K, Ennew C (1997) Venture capitalists and serial entrepreneurs. J Bus Ventur 12(3):227–249
Zhang J (2011) The advantage of experienced start-up founders in venture capital acquisition: evidence from serial entrepreneurs. Small Bus Econ 36(2):187–208
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rédis, J., Sahut, JM. (2015). Serial Entrepreneurship, Organisational Capital and Access to Venture Capital. In: Peris-Ortiz, M., Sahut, JM. (eds) New Challenges in Entrepreneurship and Finance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08888-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08888-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08887-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08888-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)