Fuzzy Concepts in Small Worlds and the Identification of Leaders in Social Networks

  • Trinidad Casasús-Estellés
  • Ronald R. Yager
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 443)


In the study of the Social Networks, the Small World phenomenon appears frequently. We apply some techniques of graph theory and fuzzy sets to characterize the Small World features as well as the existence of the figure of leader in Social Networks. These techniques help to the conceptual formalization in relational networks analysis, by transforming linguistic and human-focused manner concepts related to social networks in some formal representation. These techniques are also applied when the similarity among nodes wants to be measured in order to study the current homophily present in a Network.


Fuzzy Sets Small Worlds Social Network Leader 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Jackson, M.: Social and Economic Networks. Princeton University Press (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Watts, D.: Networks, Dynamics, and the Small-World Phenomenon. American Journal of Sociology 105(2), 493–527 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Watts, D., Strogatz, S.: Collective Dynamics of ´Small World´Networks. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Milgram, S.: The Small-World Problem. Psychology Today 2, 60–67 (1967)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yager, R.R.: Intelligent Social Network Analysis using Granular Computing 23, 1197–1220 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yager, R.R.: Concept Representation and Data base Structures in Fuzzy Social Relational Networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems. Man & Cib. 40(2), 413–419 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jungnickel, D.: Graphs, networks and algorithms, 4th edn. Springer (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mathias, N., Gopal, V.: Small - worlds: How and why.arXiv:cond-mat/0002076v1, 1-20 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Newman, M.: The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review 45, 167–256 (2003)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Freeman, L.C.: A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40, 35–41 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Newman, M.: Scientific Collaboration Networks II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Phys. Rev. E 64, 016132 (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lazarsfeld, P., Merton, R.: Friendship as a social process: a sustantive and methodological analysis. In: Freedom and Control in Modern Society. Van Nostrad, NewYork (1954)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Trinidad Casasús-Estellés
    • 1
  • Ronald R. Yager
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Economics-IEIUniversity of ValenciaSpain
  2. 2.Iona CollegeMachine Intelligence InstituteNew RochelleUSA

Personalised recommendations