Advertisement

Abstract

Museums have large databases of images. The librarians that are using these databases are doing two types of images search: either they know what they are looking for in the database (a specific image or a specific set of well defined images such as kings of France), or they do not know precisely what they are looking for (e.g., when they are required to build images portfolios about some concepts such as “decency”). As each image is having a number of metadata, searching for a well-defined image, or for set of images, is easily solved. On the contrary, this is a hard problem when the task is to illustrate a given concept such as “freedom”, “decency”, “bread”, or “transparency” since these concepts are not metadata. How to find images that are somewhat analogs because they illustrate a given concept?

We collected and analyzed the search results of librarians that were given themselves the task of finding images related to a given concept. Seven relations between the concept and the images were found as explanation of the selection of images for any concept: conceptual property, causality, effectivity semantic, anti-logic, metaphorical-vehicle and metaphorical-topic. The inter-rate agreement of independent judges that evaluated the relations was of .78.

Finally, we designed an experiment to evaluate how much metaphor in images can be understandable.

Keywords

Search Engine Specific Image Image Search Navigation Data Bread Making 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Tijus, C., Cambon de Lavalette, B., Poitrenaud, S., Leproux, C.: L’interaction autorégulatrice entre dispositif et utilisateur: une modélisation des inférences sur les durées du parcours routier. Le Travail Humain 66(1), 23–44 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tijus, C., Barcenilla, J., Jouen, F., Rougeaux, M.: Open innovation and prospective ergonomics for smart clothes. In: 2nd International Conference on Ergonomics in Design (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barcenilla, J., Tijus, C.: Ethical issues raised by the new orientations in ergonomics and living labs. Work 41, 5259–5265 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tijus, C., Poitrenaud, S., Léger, L., Brézillon, P.: Counterfactual Based Innovation: A Galois Lattice Approach of Creative Thinking. In: International Conference on Computing and Communication Technologies, RIVF 2009, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Newell, A., Simon, H.A.: Human problem solving. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1972)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roth-Berghofer, T.R.: Explanations and Case-Based Reasoning. Foundational Issues. In: Funk, P., González Calero, P.A. (eds.) ECCBR 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3155, pp. 389–403. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gombrich, E.H.: Mediations on a hobby horse. In: Meditations on a Hobby Horse and Other Essays on the Theory of Art, London (1963)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gentner, D., Toupin, C.: Systematicity and surface similarity in the development of analogy. Cognitive Science 10(3), 277–300 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ripoll, T., Eynard, J.: A Critical Analysis of Current Models of Analogy. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Information Processing And Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems, IPMU 2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kwon, H., Im, I., Van de Walle, B.: Are you thinking what I am thinking – A comparison of decision makers’ cognitive map by means of a new similarity measure. In: Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 78, p (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Flanagan, J.C.: The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin 5, 327–358 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles Candau
    • 1
  • Geoffrey Ventalon
    • 1
  • Javier Barcenilla
    • 1
  • Charles Tijus
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory Cognitions Humaine et ArtificielleUniversity Paris 8France

Personalised recommendations