Advertisement

Abstract

In its perpetual capacity to imagine, create and revisit artifacts and representations, human mind is the perfect example of generativity. Yet if we agree with Epstein (1996)’s theory of generativity, new ideas result from interconnections among old ones. That is, cultural knowledge heavily influences our individual minds. In this line, our minds need meeting other minds to generate innovation. I will argue in this article that the basis of a generative meeting between minds is imitation. This proposal is developed against the well-established reputation of imitation as an idiotic behaviour stifling creativity.

Keywords

imitation generativity flexibility development brain dynamics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andry, P., Gaussier, P., Moga, S., Banquet, J.P., Nadel, J.: Learning and communication in imitation: an autonomous robot perspective. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 31, 431–444 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D.E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R.E., Haggard, P.: Action observation and acquiredmotor skills: an fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex 15, 1243–1249 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chomsky, N.: Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge (1965)Google Scholar
  4. Dennett, D.C.: Intentional systems. Journal of Philosophy 68, 87–106 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E.: Enactivism is not interactionism. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6 (2012), doi:10.3389/fnhum.00128Google Scholar
  6. Di Paolo, E., De Jaegher, H.: The interactive brain hypothesis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6 (2012), doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00128Google Scholar
  7. Dumas, G., Nadel, J., Soussignan, R., Martinerie, J., Garnero, L.: Interbrain synchronization durting social interaction. PlosOne 5, e12166 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. Dumas, G., Martinerie, J., Soussignan, R., Nadel, J.: Does the brain know who is at the origin of what in an imitative interaction? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6 (2012), doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00128Google Scholar
  9. Epstein, R.: Cognition, Creativity, and Behavior: Selected Essays. Praeger, München (1996)Google Scholar
  10. Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., D’Audilio, A.: Broca’s area in language, action and music. Ann. N.Y. Acad; Sci. 119, 448–458 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fogel, A.: Two principles of communication: Co-regulation and framing. In: Nadel, J., Camaioni, L. (eds.) New Perspectives in Communicative Development, pp. 9–22Google Scholar
  12. Girard, R.: Things hidden since the foundation of the world (1987). Stanford University Press, Stanford (2005) (French edition: 1978)Google Scholar
  13. Guionnet, S., Nadel, J., Bertasi, E., Sperduti, M., Delaveau, P., Fossati, P.: Reciprocal imitation: toward a neural basis of social interaction. Cerebral Cortex 22(4), 971–978 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Iacoboni, M., Woods, R.P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziota, J., Rizzolatti, G.: Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science 286, 2526–2528 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lepage, J.F., Théoret, H.: The mirror neuron system: grasping others’ actions from birth? Developmental Science 10, 513–523 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meltzoff, A.N., Moore, M.: Newborn infants imitate adult facial gestures. Child Development 54, 702–709 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nadel, J., Butterworth, G.: Imitation in infancy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  18. Nadel, J., Camaioni, L.: New perspectives in communicative development. Routledge, London (1993)Google Scholar
  19. Piaget, J.: Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. Norton (translated from: La formation du symbole chez l’enfant), New York (1945/1962)Google Scholar
  20. Piontelli, A.: Development of normal fetal movements. Springer, Milano (2010)Google Scholar
  21. Prepin, K., Revel, A.: Human-machine interaction as a model of machine-machine interaction: how to make machines interact as humans do. Advanced Robotics 21, 1709–1723 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Raos, V., Evangeliou, M.N., Savaki, H.E.: Mental simulation of action in the service of action perception. Journal of Neuroscience 27, 12675–12683 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Soussignan, R., Courtial, A., Canet, P., Danon-Apter, G., Nadel, J.: Human newborns match tongue protrusion of disembodied human and robotic mouths. Developmental Science (2010), doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00984Google Scholar
  24. Sperduti, M., Guionnet, S., Fossati, P., Nadel, J.: Mirror Neuron System and Mentalizing System connect during online social interaction. Cognitive Processing (2014)Google Scholar
  25. Stern, D.: The first relationship: infant and mother. Harvard University Press, Harvard (1977)Google Scholar
  26. Trevarthen, C.: Descriptive analyses of infant communicative behaviour. In: Schaffer, H.R. (ed.) Studies of Infant-Mother Interaction. The Loch Lomond Symposium, pp. 227–270. Academic Press, London (1977)Google Scholar
  27. Varela, F.J., Thompson, E.T., Rosch, E.: The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)Google Scholar
  28. Vernant, J.-P.: Myth and thought among the Greeks. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1983)Google Scholar
  29. Wilson, M., Wilson, T.: An oscillator model of the timing of turn-taking. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12, 957–968 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zittrain, J.: The future of the internet and how to stop it. Yale University Press, Yale (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacqueline Nadel
    • 1
  1. 1.La Salpêtrière HospitalCNRS Centre Emotion, Pierre & Marie Curie University, ICMParisFrance

Personalised recommendations