Skip to main content

Abstract

We present a variant of the CONEstrip algorithm for checking whether the origin lies in a finitely generated convex cone that can be open, closed, or neither. This variant is designed to deal efficiently with problems where the rays defining the cone are specified as linear combinations of propositional sentences. The variant differs from the original algorithm in that we apply row generation techniques. The generator problem is WPMaxSAT, an optimization variant of SAT; both can be solved with specialized solvers or integer linear programming techniques. We additionally show how optimization problems over the cone can be solved by using our propositional CONEstrip algorithm as a preprocessor. The algorithm is designed to support consistency and inference computations within the theory of sets of desirable gambles. We also make a link to similar computations in probabilistic logic, conditional probability assessments, and imprecise probability theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baioletti, M., Capotorti, A., Tulipani, S., Vantaggi, B.: Simplification rules for the coherent probability assessment problem. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 35(1-4), 11–28 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bansal, N., Raman, V.: Upper bounds for MaxSat: Further improved. In: Aggarwal, A.K., Pandu Rangan, C. (eds.) ISAAC 1999. LNCS, vol. 1741, pp. 247–258. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Biazzo, V., Gilio, A., Lukasiewicz, T., Sanfilippo, G.: Probabilistic logic under coherence: complexity and algorithms. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 45(1-2), 35–81 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Biere, A., Heule, M., van Maaren, H., Walsh, T. (eds.): Handbook of Satisfiability. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 185. IOS Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cozman, F.G., di Ianni, L.F.: Probabilistic satisfiability and coherence checking through integer programming. In: van der Gaag, L.C. (ed.) ECSQARU 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7958, pp. 145–156. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Georgakopoulos, G., Kavvadias, D., Papadimitriou, C.H.: Probabilistic satisfiability. Journal of Complexity 4, 1–11 (1988)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Gomes, C.P., Kautz, H., Sabharwal, A., Selman, B.: Satisfiability solvers. In: van Harmelen, F., Lifschitz, V., Porter, B. (eds.) Handbook of Knowledge Representation, ch. 2, pp. 89–134. Elsevier (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hansen, P., Jaumard, B., de Aragão, M.P., Chauny, F., Perron, S.: Probabilistic satisfiability with imprecise probabilities. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 24(2-3), 171–189 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Manquinho, V., Marques-Silva, J., Planes, J.: Algorithms for weighted boolean optimization. In: Kullmann, O. (ed.) SAT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5584, pp. 495–508. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Prestwich, S.: CNF encodings. In: Biere, A., Heule, M., van Maaren, H., Walsh, T. (eds.) Handbook of Satisfiability. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 185, ch. 2, pp. 75–98. IOS Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pretolani, D.: Probability logic and optimization SAT: The PSAT and CPA models. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 43(1-4), 211–221 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Quaeghebeur, E.: The CONEstrip algorithm. In: Kruse, R., Berthold, M.R., Moewes, C., Gil, M.A., Grzegorzewski, P., Hryniewicz, O. (eds.) Synergies of Soft Computing and Statistics. AISC, vol. 190, pp. 45–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2013), http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-3007274

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Quaeghebeur, E.: Desirability. In: Coolen, F.P.A., Augustin, T., de Cooman, G., Troffaes, M.C.M. (eds.) Introduction to Imprecise Probabilities. Wiley (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Quaeghebeur, E., de Cooman, G., Hermans, F.: Accept & reject statement-based uncertainty models (submitted), http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.4462

  15. Walley, P.: Statistical reasoning with imprecise probabilities. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, vol. 42. Chapman & Hall (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Walley, P.: Towards a unified theory of imprecise probability. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 24(2-3), 125–148 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Walley, P., Pelessoni, R., Vicig, P.: Direct algorithms for checking consistency and making inferences from conditional probability assessments. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 126(1), 119–151 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Quaeghebeur, E. (2014). A Propositional CONEstrip Algorithm. In: Laurent, A., Strauss, O., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R.R. (eds) Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems. IPMU 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 444. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08852-5_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08852-5_48

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08851-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08852-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics