Skip to main content

Abstract

Belief functions usually contain some internal conflict. Based on Hájek-Valdés algebraic analysis of belief functions, a unique decomposition of a belief function into its conflicting and non-conflicting part was introduced at ISIPTA’11 symposium for belief functions defined on a two-element frame of discernment.

This contribution studies the conditions under which such a decomposition exists for belief functions defined on a three-element frame. A generalisation of important Hájek-Valdés homomorphism f of semigroup of belief functions onto its subsemigroup of indecisive belief functions is found and presented. A class of quasi-Bayesian belief functions, for which the decomposition into conflicting and non-conflicting parts exists is specified. A series of other steps towards a conflicting part of a belief function are presented. Several open problems from algebra of belief functions which are related to the investigated topic and are necessary for general solution of the issue of decomposition are formulated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cobb, B.R., Shenoy, P.P.: A Comparison of Methods for Transforming Belief Function Models to Probability Models. In: Nielsen, T.D., Zhang, N.L. (eds.) ECSQARU 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2711, pp. 255–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Cuzzolin, F.: The geometry of consonant belief functions: Simplicial complexes of necessity measures. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 161(10), 1459–1479 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Daniel, M.: Algebraic structures related to Dempster-Shafer theory. In: Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R.R., Zadeh, L.A. (eds.) IPMU 1994. LNCS, vol. 945, pp. 51–61. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Daniel, M.: Probabilistic Transformations of Belief Functions. In: Godo, L. (ed.) ECSQARU 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3571, pp. 539–551. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Daniel, M.: Conflicts within and between Belief Functions. In: Hüllermeier, E., Kruse, R., Hoffmann, F. (eds.) IPMU 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6178, pp. 696–705. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Daniel, M.: Non-conflicting and Conflicting Parts of Belief Functions. In: Coolen, F., de Cooman, G., Fetz, T., Oberguggenberger, M. (eds.) ISIPTA 2011, pp. 149–158, Studia Universitätsverlag, Innsbruck (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Daniel, M.: Morphisms of Dempster’s Semigroup: A Rev. and Interpret. In: Barták, R. (ed.) Proceedings of 14th Czech-Japan Seminar on Data Analysis and Decision Making Under Uncertainty, CJS 2011, pp. 26–34. Matfyzpress, Prague (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Daniel, M.: Introduction to an Algebra of Belief Functions on Three-Element Frame of Discernment — A Quasi Bayesian Case. In: Greco, S., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Coletti, G., Fedrizzi, M., Matarazzo, B., Yager, R.R. (eds.) IPMU 2012, Part III. CCIS, vol. 299, pp. 532–542. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Daniel, M.: Introduction to Algebra of Belief Functions on Three-element Frame of Discernment - A General Case. In: Kroupa, T., Vejnarová, J. (eds.) WUPES 2012. Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Uncertainty Processing, pp. 46–57. University of Economics, Prague (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Daniel, M.: Properties of Plausibility Conflict of Belief Functions. In: Rutkowski, L., Korytkowski, M., Scherer, R., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Zurada, J.M. (eds.) ICAISC 2013, Part I. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7894, pp. 235–246. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Daniel, M.: Belief Functions: A Revision of Plausibility Conflict and Pignistic Conflict. In: Liu, W., Subrahmanian, V.S., Wijsen, J. (eds.) SUM 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8078, pp. 190–203. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Daniel, M.: Steps Towards a Conflicting Part of a Belief Function. Technical report V-1179, ICS AS CR, Prague (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Destercke, S., Burger, T.: Revisiting the Notion of Conflicting Belief Functions. In: Denœux, T., Masson, M.-H. (eds.) Belief Functions: Theory & Appl. AISC, vol. 164, pp. 153–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Hájek, P., Havránek, T., Jiroušek, R.: Uncertain Information Processing in Expert Systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hájek, P., Valdés, J.J.: Generalized algebraic foundations of uncertainty processing in rule-based expert systems (dempsteroids). Computers and Artificial Intelligence 10(1), 29–42 (1991)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Lefèvre, É., Elouedi, Z., Mercier, D.: Towards an Alarm for Opposition Conflict in a Conjunctive Combination of Belief Functions. In: Liu, W. (ed.) ECSQARU 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6717, pp. 314–325. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, W.: Analysing the degree of conflict among belief functions. Artificial Intelligence 170, 909–924 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Martin, A.: About Conflict in the Theory of Belief Functions. In: Denœux, T., Masson, M.-H. (eds.) Belief Functions: Theory & Appl. AISC, vol. 164, pp. 161–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Quaeghebeur, E., de Cooman, G.: Extreme lower probabilities. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 159(16), 2163–2175 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Smets, P.: The combination of evidence in the transferable belief model. IEEE-Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 12, 447–458 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Smets, P.: Analyzing the combination of conflicting belief functions. Information Fusion 8, 387–412 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Daniel, M. (2014). Towards a Conflicting Part of a Belief Function. In: Laurent, A., Strauss, O., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R.R. (eds) Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems. IPMU 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 444. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08852-5_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08852-5_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08851-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08852-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics