Abstract
Green fever is infecting Macquarie University as it champions an innovative, people-driven, campus-wide approach to sustainability that will inspire universities across the world. A coupled human-nature framework, The EcoCycle is introduced in this paper, which will assist Universities to develop and evaluate future programs for behavioural change. The EcoCycle framework is applied to evaluate one of the University’s many sustainability activities, the Annual Department Sustainability Challenge. This program commenced in 2009 and operates at a minimal cost. In 2013, 37 Departments and 1,815 or (approx.) 81 % staff members voluntarily participated, competing for ‘sustainability stars’ awarded for their activities, including greening their offices. They received prizes, such as trees planted in critical koala habitat. The findings from this study demonstrate how the EcoCycle can be employed to understand and evaluate variables that drive or inhibit human actions towards a sustainable planet. Analyses of The Challenge highlight the importance of a whole-of-university approach that is peer and incentive driven and, most importantly, playful. Universities, as community leaders in research, technology and education are strategically placed to address global sustainability challenges. In the ominous context of the impacts of Global Climate Change, positive, constructive sustainability activities, such as the Department Sustainability Challenge provide an exemplar for University communities investing in a sustainable planet. This paper argues that potential program participants should be empowered to design their activities. This strategy ensures their engagement, emphasising that human-centric solutions are critical to addressing human-caused problems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
$AUD 6,800 = prizes, awards, and awards night catering. Three staff members worked on the DSC. The Sustainability Officer (3 months @ 5 days per week = $21,500), Sustainability Engagement Officer (3 months @ 2 days per week = $7,700), Multimedia Coordinator (1 month @ 3 days per week = $3,970).
References
Avey J, Avolio B, Crossley C, Luthans F (2009) Psychological ownership: theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes. J Organ Behav 30(2):173–191
Chavis D, Wandersman A (1990) Sense of community in the urban environment: a catalyst for participation and community development. Am J Community Psychol 18(1):55–81
Cole L (2003) Assessing sustainability on Canadian university campuses: development of a campus sustainability assessment framework. s.n., Quebec
Cubasch UD, Wuebbles D, Chen MC, Facchini D, Frame N, Mahowald Winther JG (2013) Introduction. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA
Darnton A (2008) GSR behaviour change knowledge review practical guide: an overview of behaviour change models and their uses. Government Social Research Unit, UK. http://www.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Behaviour-change_practical_guide_tcm6-9696.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2014
Davies K (2012) Intergenerational democracy: rethinking sustainable development. Galla A (ed) Common Ground Publishing, Illinois, USA
Derksen L, Gartrell J (1993) The social context of recycling. Am Sociol Rev 58:434–442
Genskow K, Prokopy L (eds) (2008) The social indicator planning and evaluation system (SIPES) for nonpoint source management: a handbook for projects in USEPA region 5. Great Lakes Regional Water Program. Publication Number: GLRWP-08-SI01, p 169
Gilg A, Barr S, Ford N (2005) Green consumption or sustainable lifestyles? Identifying the sustainable consumer. Futures 37(6):481–504
Hayles C, Holdsworth S (2008) Curriculum change for sustainability. J Educ Built Environ 3(1):25–48
Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Educ Res 8(3):239–260
Liu J, Dietz T et al (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317(5844):1513–1516
Lucas K, Brooks M, Darnton A, Jones J (2008) Promoting pro-environmental behaviour: existing evidence and policy implications. Environ Sci Policy 11(5):456–466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2008.03.001
Macquarie University (2012a) Annual sustainability report 2012. http://www.mq.edu.au/search/search-results.html?cx=018228073491741698199%3Abz06o_gto80&cof=FORID%3A9&ie=UTF-8&q=annual+suatianability+report+2012&sa=Search&siteurl=www.mq.edu.au%2Fabout_us%2Fstrategy_and_initiatives%2Fsustainability%2F&ref=&ss=12528j15919830j35. Accessed 28 March 2014
Macquarie University (2012b) Macquarie University annual report 2012. www.mq.edu/annual-reports/MU-AR2012.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2014
Macquarie University (2013a) Department sustainability challenge. http://www.mq.edu.au/about_us/strategy_and_initiatives/sustainability/get_involved/department_challenge/. Accessed 24 July 2013
Macquarie University (2013b) Our university: a framing of futures. http://www.mq.edu.au/about/strategy/. Accessed 4 March 2014
Macquarie University (2013c) Sustainability page. http://www.mq.edu.au/about_us/strategy_and_initiatives/sustainability/. Accessed 8 March 2014
Macquarie University (2013d) Human sciences web page. http://www.humansciences.mq.edu.au/news_and_events/news/2013_news/weve_won_the_2013_sustainability_challenge. Accessed 8 March 2014
Macquarie University (2013e) Get green with the team. https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.565091573529875.1073741829.176729995699370&type=3. Accessed 21 March 2014 (MQ see Macquarie University)
Martin M, Williams I, Clark M (2006) Social, cultural and structural influences on household waste recycling: a case study. Resour Conserv Recycl 48(4):357–395
McConnell W, Millington A et al (2009) Research on coupled human and natural systems (CHANS): approach, challenges, and strategies. Bull Ecol Soc Am 2011:218–228
McKenzie-Mohr D (2000) Fostering sustainable behavior through community-based social marketing. Am Psychol 55(5):531
Nye M, Hargreaves T (2010) Exploring the social dynamics of proenvironmental behavior change. J Ind Ecol 14(1):137–149
Olli E, Grendstad G, Wollebaek D (2001) Correlates of environmental behaviors bringing back social context. Environ Behav 33(2):181–208
Stern P (2000) New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Issues 56(3):407–424
Wiek A, Farioli F et al (2012) The gap between science and society. Sustain Sci 7(1):1–4
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Belinda Bean, Sustainability Officer and Leanne Denby, Director of Sustainability from Macquarie University for their assistance in preparing this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davies, K., Blik, E. (2015). Green Fever EcoCycle and Sustainability in Action. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Transformative Approaches to Sustainable Development at Universities. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08837-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08837-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08836-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08837-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)