Abstract
eLearning has been commonly accepted as a comparatively cost effective and environmentally friendly educational delivery technology. On the other hand, however, agreement as to its efficacy, quality and appropriateness for the social development and maturing of young adults, among other issues do not yield to a similar consensus. Following Brundtland’s model of sustainable development, this paper employs the Sustainability Circle Framework developed by the Global Compact Cities Programme and applies it to eLearning to provide novel and beneficial insights into the critical factors for the on-going sustainability of eLearning. The paper analyses eLearning with regard to the four domains of ecology, economy, culture and politics, providing a comprehensive and rounded perspective of the critical factors that enable eLearning to be sustainable. In addition the findings will provide input into on-going discussions regarding the adoption of eLearning by different educational sectors, within differing disciplines and across differing economic and cultural regions. Achieving an improved understanding of educational sustainability drivers has potential to not only reduce the ecological footprint of educational institutions but also to ensure that such reductions become systemic and endemic into the fabric of the institutions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Adams W (2006) The future of sustainability: re-thinking environment and development in the twenty-first century. http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/iucn_future_of_sustanability.pdf. Accessed 30 Mar 2014
Bates T (2010) Innovate or die: a message for higher education institutions. eLearning and distance education resources by Tony Bates. http://www.tonybates.ca/2010/06/28/innovate-or-die-a-message-for-higher-education-institutions/. Accessed 30 Mar 2014
Brundtland G (1987) World commission on environment and development: our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Christensen CM, Horn M (2008) Disrupting class: how disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. McGraw-Hill, New York
Christensen CM, Eyring H (2011) The innovative university: changing the DNA of higher education from the inside out. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–340
Fournier H (2006) A review of the state of the field of adult learning: eLearning. Canadian Council on Learning, Ottawa (May)
Gamalielsson J, Lundell B (2014) Sustainability of open source software communities beyond a fork: how and why has the libre office project evolved? J Syst Softw 89(3):128–145
Gunn C (2010) Sustainability factors for eLearning initiatives. ALT-J Res Learn Technol 18(2):89–103 (July)
Hall B (2004) Innovation and diffusion. Working paper no. 10212. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge
Hendriques A, Richardson J (eds) (2004) The triple bottom line: does it all add up?. Earthscan, London
James P, Scerri A (2011) Auditing cities through circles of sustainability. In: Mark A, Toly NJ, Carney PL, Segbers K (eds) Cities and global governance. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 111–136
JISC (2014) “Key learning and teaching practice activities” learning and teaching practice. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/topics/learningteaching.aspx. Accessed 24 Mar 2014
Mayadad AF, Bourne J, Basich P (2009) Online education today. 323(5910):85–89 (January)
MCP (2013) Shared services opportunities in higher education, MCP insights, management consulting partners LLC. 2(1). http://www.mcpartnersllc.com/download/Shared%20Services%20Opportunities.pdf. 30 Mar 2014
Perez C (2002) Technological revolutions and financial capital: the dynamics of bubbles and golden ages. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Reichel M, Ramey MA (eds) (1987) Conceptual frameworks for bibliographic education: theory to practice. Libraries Unlimited Inc., Littleton
Robertson I (2008) Sustainable eLearning, activity theory and professional development. In: Paper presented at the Australiasian society for computers in learning in tertiary education 2008 (November) conference, Melbourne, Australia
Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, New York
Roy R, Potter S, Yarrow K (2008) Designing low carbon higher education systems: environmental impacts of campus and distance learning systems. Int J Sustain High Educ 9(2):116–130
Schumpeter Joseph A (1942) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Routledge, London
Stewart B, Khare A (2012) Athabasca university reduces ICT carbon footprint. GSTF J Comput [serial online] 1(4):70–75 (January)
Stepanyan K, Littlejohn A, Margaryan A (2013) Sustainable eLearning: toward a coherent body of knowledge. Educ Technol Soc 16(2):91–102
Stoneman P (2002) The economics of technological diffusion. Blackwell, Oxford
Suhonen J, Sutinen E (2014) The four pillar model—analysing the sustainability of online doctoral programmes. Tech trends (in press)
The Sloan Consortium (2013) New study: over 6.7 million students learning online. http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/grade-change-2013. Accessed 27 Mar 2014
UN Global Compact Cities Programme (2013) The circles of sustainability urban profile process. International Secretariat based at the Global Cities Institute, RMIT University in Melbourne, Australia. http://citiesprogramme.com/archives/resource/circles-of-sustainability-urban-profile-process. Accessed 29 Mar 2014
U.S. Department of Education (2010) Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: a meta-analysis and review of online learning studies
Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci 46(2):186–204
Xu B, Jones DR, Shao B (2009) Volunteers’ involvement in online community based software development. Inf Manage 46(3):151–158 (April)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stewart, B., Khare, A. (2015). eLearning and the Sustainable Campus. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Transformative Approaches to Sustainable Development at Universities. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08837-2_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08837-2_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08836-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08837-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)