Skip to main content

Selection of ICF Core Sets for Functioning Assessment in Disability Evaluation Toward the Assignment to Return to Work Programs and/or Disability Benefits

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Vocational Rehabilitation and Disability Evaluation

Part of the book series: Handbooks in Health, Work, and Disability ((SHHDW))

Abstract

Disability evaluation is crucial for deciding on claimants’ eligibility for disability benefits or their assignment to appropriate return to work programs. Recently emerging criticism points to low transparency and comparability of the evaluations. They are often reported in a poorly standardized way and focus on the determination of a claimant’s health condition rather than on a comprehensible documentation of his or her functioning at work. In addition, the evaluations hardly explain how the claimant’s work functioning is influenced by impairments and contextual factors. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) represents the worldwide standard for reporting on functioning and disability. Based on a biopsychosocial framework, the ICF conceptualizes human functioning holistically as the interplay between body functions and structures, activities and participation, as well as contextual factors and thus promises transparent reporting in disability evaluation. Moreover, the ICF taxonomy provides a comprehensive spectrum of categories for standardized documentation of functioning assessments which represent core elements of disability evaluation. ICF Core Sets preserve the ICF in a useable mode and may serve as practical tools for reporting on functioning assessments. This chapter illustrates how ICF Core Sets should be selected for functioning assessments in the context of disability evaluation toward the assignment to return to work programs and/or eligibility determination for disability benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

AS:

Ankylosing spondylitis

CWP:

Chronic widespread pain

EUMASS:

European Union of Medicine in Assurance and Social Security

GHS:

German National Health Interview and Examination Survey

ICF:

International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

ICF-CS:

ICF Core Set

LBP:

Low back pain

NHANES:

United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

RTW:

Return to work

SCI:

Spinal cord injury

VR:

Vocational rehabilitation

References

  1. Rudbeck M, Fonager K. Agreement between medical expert assessments in social medicine. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7):766–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Meershoek A, Krumeich A, Vos R. Judging without criteria? Sickness certification in Dutch disability schemes. Sociol Health Illn. 2007;29(4):497–514.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Horan TA, Daniels SM, Feldman SS. The prospective role of personal health records in streamlining and accelerating the disability determination process. Disabil Health J. 2009;2(3):153–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. de Boer WE, Rijkenberg AM, Donceel P. Guidelines for assessment of work disability: an international survey. Gesundheitswesen. 2011;73(6):e103–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. APPLICA, CESEP, European Centre. Study of compilation of disability: statistical data from the administrative registers of the member states. Brussels: APPLICA, CESEP, European Centre; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  6. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anner J, Schwegler U, Kunz R, Trezzini B, de Boer W. Evaluation of work disability and the international classification of functioning, disability and health: what to expect and what not. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:470.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sanderson K, Nicholson J, Graves N, Tilse E, Oldenburg B. Mental health in the workplace: using the ICF to model the prospective associations between symptoms, activities, participation and environmental factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(17):1289–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schwegler U, Anner J, Boldt C, Glässel A, Lay V, De Boer WEL, et al. Aspects of functioning and environmental factors in medical work capacity evaluations of persons with chronic widespread pain and low back pain can be represented by a combination of applicable ICF Core Sets. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):1088.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Finger ME, Escorpizo R, Glässel A, Gmünder HP, Lückenkemper M, Chan C, et al. ICF Core Set for vocational rehabilitation: results of an international consensus conference. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(5):429–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Biering-Sörensen F, Scheuringer M, Baumberger M, Charlifue SW, Post MW, Montero F, et al. Developing core sets for persons with spinal cord injuries based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a way to specify functioning. Spinal Cord. 2006;44(9):541–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grill E, Ewert T, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. ICF Core Sets development for the acute hospital and early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(7–8):361–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bickenbach J, Cieza A, Rauch A, Stucki G, editors. ICF Core Sets: manual for clinical practice. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cieza A, Oberhauser C, Bickenbach J, Chatterji S, Stucki G. Towards a Minimal Generic Set of domains of functioning and health. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:218.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brage S, Donceel P, Falez F. Development of ICF core set for disability evaluation in social security. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(18):1392–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer PP, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. How to assess physical work-ability with functional capacity evaluation methods in a more specific and efficient way? Work. 2010;37(1):111–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schult ML, Ekholm J. Agreement of a work-capacity assessment with the World Health Organisation International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health pain sets and back-to-work predictors. Int J Rehabil Res. 2006;29(3):183–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Anner J, Brage S, Donceel P, Falez F, Freudenstein R, Oancea C, et al. Validation of the EUMASS Core Set for medical evaluation of work disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(25):2147–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schwegler U, Anner J, Glässel A, Brach M, de Boer WE, Cieza A, et al. Towards comprehensive and transparent reporting: context-specific additions to the ICF taxonomy for medical evaluations of work capacity involving claimants with chronic widespread pain and low back pain. In revision. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Slebus FG, Sluiter JK, Kuijer PP, Willems JH, Frings-Dresen MH. Work-ability evaluation: a piece of cake or a hard nut to crack? Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(16):1295–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schwegler U, Peter C, Trezzini B, Anner J, Geyh S. Towards transparent documentation in medical work capacity evaluations: identifying personal factors in medical reports on Swiss disability claimants with chronic widespread pain. Int J Rehabil Res. 2013;36(4):298–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chamberlain MA, Fialka Moser V, Schüldt Ekholm K, O’Connor RJ, Herceg M, Ekholm J. Vocational rehabilitation: an educational review. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(11):856–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stover M, Pape K, Johnsen R, Fleten N, Sund ER, Claussen B, et al. Rehabilitation time before disability pension. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:375.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gensby U, Labriola M, Irvin E, Amick 3rd BC, Lund T. A classification of components of workplace disability management programs: results from a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(2):220–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Escorpizo R, Stucki G. Disability evaluation, social security, and the international classification of functioning, disability and health: the time is now. J Occup Environ Med. 2013;55(6):644–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Boonen A. Socioeconomic consequences of ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2002;20(6 Suppl 28):S23–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schmidt J, Schwebach RG. Preliminary trial on the effectiveness of early intervention manual therapy in reducing costs of presenteeism due to musculoskeletal pain. J Health Prod. 2007;2(1):26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gatchel RJ, Peng YB, Peters ML, Fuchs PN, Turk DC. The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: scientific advances and future directions. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(4):581–624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Franceschini M, Pagliacci MC, Russo T, Felzani G, Aito S, Marini C. Occurrence and predictors of employment after traumatic spinal cord injury: the GISEM Study. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:238–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rauch A, Cieza A, Stucki G. How to apply the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) for rehabilitation management in clinical practice. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008;44(3):329–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cieza A, Kirchberger I, Biering-Sörensen F, Baumberger M, Charlifue S, Post MW, et al. ICF Core Sets for individuals with spinal cord injury in the long-term context. Spinal Cord. 2010;48(4):305–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jahiel RI, Scherer MJ. Initial steps towards a theory and praxis of person-environment interaction in disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(17):1467–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bair MJ, Robinson RL, Katon W, Kroenke K. Depression and pain comorbidity: a literature review. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(20):2433–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cieza A, Boldt C, Ballert CS, Eriks-Hoogland I, Bickenbach JE, Stucki G. Setting up a cohort study on functioning: deciding what to measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;90(11 Suppl 2):S17–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Duchan JF. Where is the person in the ICF? Adv Speech-Lang Pathol. 2004;6(1):63–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Geyh S, Peter C, Müller R, Bickenbach JE, Kostanjsek N, Üstün BT, et al. The personal factors of the international classification of functioning, disability and health in the literature: a systematic review and content analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(13–14):1089–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sjöberg L. Risk and willingness to work. Int J Risk Assess Manag. 2007;7(2):224–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bickenbach JE, Chatterji S, Badley EM, Üstün TB. Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(9):1173–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Grotkamp SL, Cibis WM, Nüchtern EAM, von Mittelstaedt G, Seger WKF. Personal factors in the international classification of functioning, disability and health: prospective evidence. Aust J Rehabil Couns. 2012;18(1):1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Geyh S, Cieza A, Bickenbach JE, Stucki G. ICF personal factors preparatory outline. [Internal manuscript]. In press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Saltychev M, Kinnunen A, Laimi K. Vocational rehabilitation evaluation and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(1):106–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Urban Schwegler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schwegler, U., Selb, M., Escorpizo, R., Stucki, G. (2015). Selection of ICF Core Sets for Functioning Assessment in Disability Evaluation Toward the Assignment to Return to Work Programs and/or Disability Benefits. In: Escorpizo, R., Brage, S., Homa, D., Stucki, G. (eds) Handbook of Vocational Rehabilitation and Disability Evaluation. Handbooks in Health, Work, and Disability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08825-9_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08825-9_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08824-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08825-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics