Skip to main content

Building in Resilience: Long-term Considerations in the Design and Production of Residential Buildings in Israel

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disaster Management: Enabling Resilience

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Social Networks ((LNSN))

  • 2112 Accesses

Abstract

Threats to national security, such as that against critical infrastructures not only stem from man-made acts but also from natural hazards. Hurricane Katrina (2005), Blackout Canada-US (2003), Fukushima (2011), Hurricane Sandy (2012), and Alberta floods (2013) are examples that highlight the vulnerability of critical infrastructures and buildings to different kinds of disasters. In this chapter we describe the need for an integrated approach to building design which considers the possible synergies between structural durability and energy efficiency. Developing ideas from previous work regarding architectural awareness of earthquake resistance, we introduce three levels of integration needed when designing for resilience: (1) integration in multi-disciplinary design teams; (2) integration in the design process, i.e. integrated design or co-design, and (3) integration of long-term and short-term considerations. The aim of this chapter is to examine barriers to the integrated design of resilient buildings by looking at disincentives for non-linear co-design processes along the extended building supply chain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to a meeting report regarding regulations for energy efficiency, took place in February 2011 as part of the code preparation: given by prof. Erel from Ben Gurion University.

  2. 2.

    In order to prevent the penetration of toxic gases.

  3. 3.

    The association of contractors and builders in Israel estimated an additional cost of 34,000 shekels for each apartment because of this requirement in their document from 25/10/11.

  4. 4.

    Taken from Sever [34].

  5. 5.

    Taken from the Ministry of National Infrastructures, Energy and Water Resources’ site: a PDF document in Hebrew: Energy consumption in buildings (2012).

  6. 6.

    This was the subject of a professional day (2.7.13) that included lectures by an engineer specializing in seismic design, a leading Israeli project manager specializing in green projects, a head of the engineering branch of one of the municipalities, and entrepreneurs.

  7. 7.

    It is interesting to notice that one of the leading contractors in Israel explained in a public panel that he could build a green building which would cost less than a conventional one.

  8. 8.

    These skills are needed in order to get any permit not only for green building.

  9. 9.

    One of the Israeli entrepreneurs who lead the market of green building related to convincing the clients of the added value as the real challenge. He was speaking in the Israel Engineers Association for Construction and Infrastructure’s panel discussing: “Do entrepreneurs like green building?” in 2011.

  10. 10.

    This statement can help designers and owners to agree on goals that are reasonably in line with resources available, as suggested in design checklist to facilitate architect/engineer interaction [37].

  11. 11.

    However, according to the contractors, the procedure for professionally approving regulations is handled separately by each ministry, without considering the implication of all of these requirements together on the apartment’s price.

References

  1. Alterman R (2002) Planning in the face of crisis: land use, housing and mass immigration in Israel. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alterman R, Silverman E, Pialkof H, Mualem N (2011) Affordable housing: statutory tools and local policy (a draft for distribution). Center for Urban and Regional Studies, Ministry of the Interior (Hebrew), Technion, Haifa

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold CH (2001) Architectural considerations. In: Naeim F (ed) The seismic design Handbook. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston Mass, pp 275–326

    Google Scholar 

  4. Association of contractors and builders in Israel (2011) A rise in construction costs caused by regulation. http://www.landvalue.org.il/index2.php?id=3532&lang=HEB

  5. Bar Ilan Y, Pearlmutter D, Tal A (2010) Building green, promoting energy efficiency in Israel. Center for Urban and Regional Studies, Technion, Haifa

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bennet J (2000) Construction—the third way. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blayse AM, Manley K (2004) Key influences on construction innovation. Construction Innovation (Sage Publications, Ltd.), vol 4(3), pp 143–154

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bosher L, Dainty A (2011) Disaster risk reduction and ‘built in’ resilience: towards overarching principles for construction practice. Disasters 35(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brechia V, Hasson SH (2012) Environmental policy in Israel 1948–2011: processes and trends that led to a “business as usual” scenario, sustainability outlook for Israel 2030. http://www.kayamut2030.org/

  10. CBS, Central Bureau of Statistics (2010) Statistical abstract of Israel, survey of industries in the economy-construction No. 22.3

    Google Scholar 

  11. Charleson AW, Pirie S (2009) An investigation of structural engineer-architect collaboration. SESOC J 22(1):97–104

    Google Scholar 

  12. Coaffee J (2008) Risk, resilience, and environmentally sustainable cities. Energy Policy 36(12):4633–4638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Conejos S, Langston C, Smith J (2013) AdaptSTAR model: a climate friendly strategy to promote built environment sustainability. Habitat Int 37:95–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Davidson C (2010). Multi-actor arrangements and project management. In: Gonzalo L, Cassidy J, Davidson C (eds) Rebuilding after disasters: from emergency to sustainability. Spon Press, Oxon, pp 89–109

    Google Scholar 

  15. Evans M (2011) Population dispersal policy and the 1990s immigration wave. Isr Stud 16(1):104–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fundaminsky S (2007) Stakeholder attitudes toward energy-efficient building, a neighborhood case study. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Jacob Blaustien Institutes for Desert Research, MA

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hoffman AJ, Henn R (2008) Overcoming the social and psychological barriers to green building. Organ Environ 21(4):390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hong-Minh SM, Barker R, Naim MM (2001) Identifying supply chain solutions in the UK house building sector. Eur J Purchasing Supply Manage 7:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. IEA (2003) Task 23, optimization of solar energy use in large buildings. Integrated Design Process Guidelines, Berlin, Zug

    Google Scholar 

  20. ILGBC (2012) Including green building in NMP 38 projects. http://www.ilgbc.org/template/default.aspx?PageId=26

  21. ILGBC (2013) Green building costs of residential buildings in Israel. http://www.ilgbc.org/template/default.aspx?PageId=26

  22. Isareli State Comptroller (2011) The durability of structures and infrastructures in earthquakes—a situation report. Jeruaslem (Hebrew). www.mevaker.gov.il

  23. Kallus R, Yone HL (2002) National home, personal home: public housing and the shaping of national space in Israel. Eur Plann Stud 10(6):765–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kincaid D (2000) Adaptability potentials for buildings and infrastructure in sustainable cities. Facilities 18:155–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kleinsmann M, Valkenburg R (2008) Barriers and enablers for creating shared understanding in co-design projects. Des Stud 29(4):369–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Larsson N (2009) The integrated design process; history and analysis. International initiative for a sustainable built environment

    Google Scholar 

  27. Liu A (2012) Integrated design for achieving building seismic resilience. In: 15th world conference of earthquake engineering, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  28. McEntire DA (2005) Why vulnerability matters: exploring the merit of an inclusive disaster reduction concept. Disaster Prev Manage 14(2):206–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mileti D (1999) Disasters by design: a reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  30. OECD (2003) Environmentally sustainable buildings: challenges and policies. OECD Publications Service, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pearlmutter D, Meir I (1995) Assessing the climatic implications of lightweight housing in a peripheral arid region. Build Environ 30(3):441–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Perelman L (2008) Infrastructure risk and renewal: the clash of blue and green-Symposium introduction, pp 1–9. http://www.riskinstitute.org/PERI/

  33. Sarja A (2000) Integrated life cycle design of materials and structures. In: 8th international conference on durability of building materials RILEM Publications, Helsinki, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sever M (2007) A seismic architecture as an essential component of the structural integrity of Israeli apartment buildings in earthquakes. M.Sc. Technion, Hebrew

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sever M, Garb Y, Pearlmutter D (2012) Exploring barriers to the integrated design and production of resilient buildings in Israel. In: 15th world conference of earthquake engineering, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  36. Shadar H (2004) Between east and west: immigrants, critical regionalism and public housing. J Archit 9(1):23–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. State of California (1991) Committee on the architect’s role in earthquake hazard mitigation. Architectural practice and earthquake hazards. State seismic safety Commission, California

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tierney KJ (2008) Structure and process in the study of disaster resilience. In: 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yankelevsky D, Sever M, Schwarz S, Zerubavel U (2011) Architectural principles for seismic design. The Israel Ministry of Construction and Housing and the Technion Research and Development Foundation Limited, Haifa

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zailer V (2003) Israel state committee of inquiry for the safety of publicly used buildings and facilities, final report. Summary of the report: http://elyon1.court.gov.il/heb/veadot/versay_full/eng.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Sever .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sever, M., Garb, Y., Pearlmutter, D. (2015). Building in Resilience: Long-term Considerations in the Design and Production of Residential Buildings in Israel. In: Masys, A. (eds) Disaster Management: Enabling Resilience. Lecture Notes in Social Networks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08819-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics