Skip to main content

Selfoptimized Assembly Planning for a ROS Based Robot Cell

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2013/2014

Abstract

In this paper, we present a hybrid approach to automatic assembly planning, where all computational intensive tasks are executed once prior to the actual assembly by an Offline Planner component. The result serves as basis of decision-making for the Online Planner component, which adapts planning to the actual situation and unforeseen events. Due to the separation into offline and online planner, this approach allows for detailed planning as well as fast computation during the assembly, therefore enabling appropriate assembly duration even in nondeterministic environments. We present simulation results of the planner and detail the resulting planner’s behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brecher, Christian, Fritz Klocke, Günther Schuh, and Robert Schmitt, eds. 2007. Excellence in production. Aachen: Apprimus.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brecher, Christian, Tobias Kempf, and Werner Herfs. 2008. Cognitive Control Technology for a Self-Optimizing Robot Based Assembly Cell. In Proceedings of the ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 1423–1431. America Society of Mechanical Engineers, USA

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kausch, Bernhard, Christopher M. Schlick, Wolfgang Kabuß, Barabara Odenthal, Marcel Ph. Mayer, and Marco Faber. 2009. Simulation of Human Cognition in Self-Optimizing Assembly Systems. In Proceedings of 17th World Congress on Ergonomics IEA 2009, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hoffmann, J. 2001. FF: The fast-forward planning system. The AI Magazine 22 (3): 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hoffmann, Jörg, and R. Brafman. 2005. Contingent Planning via Heuristic Forward Search with Implicit Belief States. In In Proceedings of ICAPS'05, 71–80. AAAI.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Castellini, Claudio, Enrico Giunchiglia, Armando Tacchella, and O. Tachella. 2001. Improvements to SAT-based Conformant Planning. In Proceedings of 6th European Conference on Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kaufman, S. G., R. H. Wilson, R. E. Jones, T. L. Calton, and A. L. Ames. 1996. LDRD final report: Automated planning and programming of assembly of fully 3D mechanisms. Technical Report SAND96-0433, Sandia National Laboratories.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thomas, U. Automatisierte Programmierung von Robotern für Montageaufgaben. Fortschritte in der Robotik, vol. 13. Aachen: Shaker.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tecnomatix. 2011. http://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/en_us/products/tecnomatix/index.shtml.

  10. Zäh, M., and M. Wiesbeck. 2008. A model for adaptively generating assembly instructions using state-based graphs. In Manufacturing systems and technologies for the new frontier, ed. Mamoru Mitsuishi, Kanji Ueda, and Fumihiko Kimura. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Röhrdanz, F., H. Mosemann, and F. M. Wahl. 1996. HighLAP: A High Level System for Generating, Representing, and Evaluating Assembly Sequences. IEEE International Joint Symposia on Intelligence and Systems, Rockville, Maryland, USA, 134–141.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Homem de Mello, L. S., and A. C. Sanderson. 1986. AND/OR Graph Representation of Assembly Plans. In Proceedings of 1986 AAAI National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1113–1119.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ewert, Daniel, Daniel Schilberg, and Sabina Jeschke. 2011. Selfoptimization in Adaptive Assembly Planning. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on CAD/CAM Robotics and Factories of the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hart, P. E., N. J. Nilsson, and B. Raphael. 1968. A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics 4 (2): 100–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Anderl, Reiner, and D. Tripper. 2000. STEP standard for the exchange of product model data. Stuttgart/Leipzig: Teubner.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the German Research Foundation DFG for supporting the research on human-robot cooperation within the Cluster of Excellence “Integrative Production Technology for High-Wage Countries”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Ewert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ewert, D., Schilberg, D., Jeschke, S. (2014). Selfoptimized Assembly Planning for a ROS Based Robot Cell. In: Jeschke, S., Isenhardt, I., Hees, F., Henning, K. (eds) Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2013/2014. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08816-7_47

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics