Abstract
The ratification of the Bologna Process in 1999 has led to fundamental changes in the European higher education area. After more than a decade of Bologna reform efforts, the question arises whether and to what degree the declared goals of the Bologna Process (e.g. increasing student mobility and employability) have been achieved in the educational practice, i.e. on the individual university level. This desire points to the question of what these goals exactly are, how they are structured and how to eventually prioritize among them. The search for a comparable systematisation of the reforms objectives unveils only its absence.
This paper presents the work of higher engineering education scientists on the development of a comprehensive understanding of the Bologna Process objectives, their interconnections and practical measures in order to make this large scale reform accessible to the controlling of European universities’ decision making. To this aim, the objectives are mapped in the form of a software based system model, according to the theory of System Dynamics. The elements of the model are fully based on the official Bologna declarations, memoranda as well as expert literature. It therefore claims to represent the state of the art on the goals of the Bologna Process. For the first time this system model structures the Bologna goals ordered by levels of hierarchy and it quantifies their dependencies on the basis of the System Dynamics approach. The validity of the model has been assessed based on qualitative and quantitative data, generated in a study involving 29 German experts in the field of higher education specialized on the Bologna Process. Further research will concentrate on a practical application of this system model, including the evaluation of the model’s statements. Ultimately, the model’s insights will enable European universities to estimate their respective degrees of Bologna goal attainment and to identify key measures for individual improvement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
TeachING-LearnING.EU. 2011. Official website. http://www.teaching-learning.eu/.
Jungmann, Thorsten, Kristina Müller, and Katharina Schuster. 2010. Shift from TeachING to LearnING Anforderungen an die Ingenieurausbildung in Deutschland. Journal Hochschuldidaktik 2 (2010): 6–8.
Bologna declaration. 1999, June 19. Joint declaration of the European Ministers of Education.
Prague communiqué. 2001. Towards the European Higher Education Area.
Berlin communiqué. 2003. Realising the European Higher Education Area.
Bergen communiqué. 2005. The European Higher Education Area – Achieving the goals.
London communiqué. 2007. Towards the European Higher Education Area: Responding to challenges in a globalised world.
Leuven communiqué. 2009. The Bologna Process 2020 - The European Higher Education Area in the new decade.
Budapest/Vienna communiqué. 2010. Budapest-Vienna Declaration on the European Higher Education Area.
Bucharest communiqué. 2012. Making the Most of Our Potential: Consolidating the European Higher Education Area.
Kehm, Barbara M. 2010. The future of the bologna process – The bologna process of the future. European Journal of Education 45 (4): 529–534.
Keeling, R. 2006. The bologna process and the lisbon research agenda: The European commission` expanding role in higher education discourse. European Journal of Education 41 (2): 203–223.
Ceylan, Firat, Janina Fiehn, Silke Schworm, Christian Harteis, and Nadja Verena Partz. 2011. Kompetenz in der Hochschuldidaktik: Ergebnisse einer Delphi-Studie über die Zukunft der Hochschullehre. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Witte, Johanna, Don F. Westerheijden, and Andrew McCoshan. 2011. Wirkungen von Bologna auf Studierende: Eine Bestandsaufnahme in 48 Hochschulsystemen. In Der Bologna-Prozess aus Sicht der Hochschulforschung. Analysen und Impulse für die Praxis, ed. Sigrun Nickel. Gütersloh: Centrum für Hochschulentwicklung gGmbH. (CHE Arbeitspapierte).
CRE. 1999. The Bologna Declaration on the European space for higher education: An explanation. Technical report.
Commission of the European Communities. 2001. Communication from the Commission – Making a European Area of Lifelong Learning a Reality.
Alex Linley, P., John Maltby, Alex M. Wood, Gabrielle Osborne, and Robert Hurling. 2009. Measuring happiness: The higher order factor structure of subjective and psychological well-being measures. Personality and Individual Differences 47 (8): 878–884.
OECD. 2011. How’s Life?: Measuring well-being. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264121164-en.
Sterman, John D. 2000. Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston: Irwin, McGraw-Hill.
Consideo GmbH. 2012. iMODELER 3.0.
Unipark. QuestBack - EFS Survey. 2013, 06. December. http://www.unipark.info/1-0-online-befragungssoftware-fuer-studenten-und-universitaeten-unipark-home.htm.
IBM Software. 2012. SPSS 20.
Allegre, Claude, and Luigi Berlinguer, Tessa Blackstone, and \refauJürgen Rüttgers. 1998. Sorbonne Joint Declaration - Joint declaration on harmonisation of the architecture of the European higher education system. http://www.bologna-berlin2003.de/pdf/Sorbonne_declaration.pdf.
Harrington, H. J. 1987. Poor-quality cost. New York, Milwaukee: ASQC Quality Press. (Number 11 in Quality and reliability. M. Dekker).
TeachING-LearnING.EU. 2011. Official website. http://www.teaching-learning.eu/innovative_hochschuldidaktik/best_practice_europa.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
an Haack, A., Braun, L., Bach, U., Vossen, R., Jeschke, S. (2014). Mapping the Goals of the Bologna Process. In: Jeschke, S., Isenhardt, I., Hees, F., Henning, K. (eds) Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2013/2014. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08816-7_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08816-7_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08815-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08816-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)