Skip to main content

Scientific Performance Indicators – Empirical Results from Collaborative Research Centers and Clusters of Excellence in Germany

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2013/2014

Abstract

Collaborative research centers and clusters of excellence constitute public funded programs aspiring to advance research in interdisciplinary forms of collaboration throughout Germany. Due to emerging funding volumes and increasing expectations in results, concepts for performance measurement and management gain in importance. Results of an empirical study among all actively funded collaborative research centers and clusters of excellence make obvious that key performance indicators – such as the quota of publications or the number of international visiting researchers – are central. Nevertheless, holistic methods and concepts of performance measurement seem still not to be widespread among respective speakers and chief executive officers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. BMBF – Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, ed. 2008. Bundesbericht Forschung und Innovation. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hornbostel, S. and M. von Ins. 2009. Leistungsmessung in der Forschung – Erfordernis oder Vermessenheit? Laborwelt 10 (5): 34–35.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vossen, R., F. Welter, I. Leisten, A. Richert, and I. Isenhardt, 2011. Making Scientific Performance Measurable – Experiences From a German Cluster of Excellence. In ICERI 2011, ed. L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez, and I. Candel Torres, 3878–3886. International Association of Technology, Education and Development, IATED, Valencia.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Welter, F., C. Jooß, A. Richert, S. Jeschke, and C. Brecher. 2012. Organisation and management of integrative research. In Integrative production technology for high-wage countries, ed. C. Brecher, 64–73. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Higgins, J. C. 1989. Performance measurement in universities. European Journal of Operational Research 38 (3): 358–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guthrie, J., and Neumann, R. 2007. Economic and non-financial performance indicators in universities. Public Management Review 9 (2): 231–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rassenhövel, S. 2010. Performancemessung im Hochschulbereich: Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Befunde. Aachen: Gabler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Jooß, C., F. Welter, A. Richert, S. Jeschke, and C. Brecher. 2010. A Management Approach for Interdisciplinary Research Networks in a Knowledge-Based Society - Case Study of the Cluster of Excellence “Integrative Production Technology for High-Wage Countries”. In ICERI2010 Proceedings 138–143.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Welter, F., R. Vossen, A. Richert, and I. Isenhardt. 2010. Network management for Clusters of Excellence: A Balanced-Scorecard Approach as a Performance Measurement Tool. The Business Review 15 (1): 171–178.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sydow, J. and S. Duschek. 2011. Management interorganisationaler Beziehungen. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  11. DFG – Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, ed. 2008. 40 Jahre Sonderforschungsbereiche. duz – spezial. duz – das unabhängige Hochschulmagazin. Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  12. DFG – Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, ed. 2010. Monitoring des Förderprogramms Sonderforschungsbereiche. Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sondermann, M., D. Simon, A.-M. Scholz, and S. Hornbostel, eds. 2008. Die Exzellenzinitiative: Beobachtungen aus der Implementierungsphase. No. 5 in iFQ-Working Paper. Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  14. DFG – Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, ed. 2010. Zweite Phase der Exzellenzinitiative – Förderlinie Exzellenzcluster. Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  15. DFG/WR – Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and Wissenschaftsrat, ed. 2008. Bericht der Gemeinsamen Kommission zur Exzellenzinitiative an die Gemeinsame Wissenschaftskonferenz. http://www.gwk-bonn.de/fileadmin/Papers/GWK-Bericht-Exzellenzinitiative.pdf.

  16. Reinhardt, A. 2009. Mehr als die Summe der Teile – die Sonderforschungsbereiche/Transregio: Zentrale Befunde der Evaluation der Variante des Programms Sonderforschungsbereiche, DFG Infobrief – Zahlen und Fakten zur Forschungsförderung, pp1-8. URL.

    Google Scholar 

  17. DFG – Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, ed. 2012. Sonderforschungsbereiche. URL.

    Google Scholar 

  18. DFG – Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, ed. 2006. Merkblatt Exzellenzcluster. http://www.dfg.de/forschungsfoerderung/formulare/download/exin1.pdf.

  19. Jooß, C., F. Welter, A. Richert, and S. Jeschke. 2011. The Challenge of Scientific Cooperation in Large Complex Research Clusters – Experiences from the Cluster of Excellence “Integrative Production Technology for High-Wage Countries”. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Knowledge Management 481–487.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hilgers, D. 2008. Performance-Management: Leistungserfassung und Leistungssteuerung in Unternehmen und öffentlichen Verwaltungen. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kozielski, S. 2010. Integratives Kennzahlensystem für den Werkzeugbau. Aachen: Apprimus.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wettstein, T. 2002. Gesamtheitliches Performance-Measurement – Vorgehensmodell undinformationstechnische Ausgestaltung. Dissertation Universität Freiburg and Schweiz.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Neely, A. 1989. Measuring Business Performance. London: Bloomberg.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Horváth, P., R. Gleich, and D. Voggenreiter. 2001. Controlling umsetzen: Fallstudien, Lösungen und Basiswissen. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel. (3., überarb. und erw. aufl edition).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gleich, R. 2001. Das System des Performance Measurement: Theoretisches Grundkonzept, Entwicklungs- und Anwendungsstand. München: Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lachnit, L. 1979. Systemorientierte Jahresabschlussanalyse. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gladen, W. 2002. Performance Measurement als Methode der Unternehmenssteuerung. In Performance Measurement, ed. H.-P. Fröschle, 5–16. (Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Eccles, R. G. 1991. The Performance Measurement Manifesto. Harvard Business Review 43:131–137.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton. 1992. The Balanced Scorecard Measures That Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review Jan–Feb 1992:71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Horváth, P. and M. Seiter. 2009. Performance Measurement. Die Betriebswirtschaft 69 (3): 393–414.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Weber, J. and U. Schäffer. 2006. Einführung in das Controlling. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel. (11., vollst. überarb. aufl edition).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schedler, K., and I. Proeller. 2006. New public management. 2132 vols. Bern: Haupt. (UTB, 3., vollständig überarb. aufl edition).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Klingebiel, N., ed. 2001. Performance measurement & balanced scorecard. München: Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dillman, D. A. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  35. BMBF – Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, ed. 2008. Exzellenzinitiative.http://www.bmbf.de/de/1321.php.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was performed as part of the cluster of excellence “Integrative Production Technology for High-Wage Countries”, which is funded by the excellence initiative by the German federal and state governments to promote science and research at German universities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Welter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Welter, F., Schröder, S., Leisten, I., Richert, A., Jeschke, S. (2014). Scientific Performance Indicators – Empirical Results from Collaborative Research Centers and Clusters of Excellence in Germany. In: Jeschke, S., Isenhardt, I., Hees, F., Henning, K. (eds) Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2013/2014. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08816-7_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics