Skip to main content

Design and Development of a Business Model for Less Than Truck Load Freight Cooperation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1347 Accesses

Abstract

In times of globalized markets growing cutthroat competition compels companies to continuously identify new optimization potentials along their supply chain (Killich and Luczak, Unternehmenskooperation für kleine und mittelständische Unternehmen, p. V, 2003). In particular small and medium sized logistic service providers suffer from this development and lack the resources and geographical reach as well as the required quantities of customer shipments (Klaas-Wissing and Albers, Int J Logist Res Appl 13, p. 494, 2010).

Freight cooperation offers new alternatives for logistic service providers to assert their position against big competitors by bundling shipments of several participating logistic service providers and thereby, generating synergetic effects. Successful cooperation already exists in terms of general cargo and full truck load situations. Yet, in the case of Less than Truck Load shipments, no comparable solutions are available today. Usually not enough shipments with similar dispatch or receipt places exist, which leads to a small rate of return per truck (Tummel et al., Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Logistics and Transport & the 4th International Conference on Operations and Supply Chain Management, p. 2, 2011).

Hence, a suitable business model for a Less Than Truck Load freight cooperation is needed which is based on an IT-based central disposition, while in the meantime utilization rates are maximized and the number of empty runs is reduced (Bretzke, Logistische Netzwerke, p. 334, 2010). In addition, adequate fairness models and incentive concepts are fundamental requirements which have to be covered by the business model in order to overcome doubts of potential participants and to guarantee a successful cooperation.

In this paper we describe the development for a Less Than Truck Load business model, which is developed by the Project “Cloud Logistic” funded by the state North Rhine-Westphalia of the Federal Republic of Germany and by means of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). For the development we apply a combination of the Business Model Canvas (Osterwalder and Pigneur, Business Model Generation, p. 14, 2009) and a trend-based scenario technique, which enables us to create future scenarios and to derive action plans. Thereby, we establish a robust and sustainable business model for freight cooperation networks in the Less Than Truck Load segment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A high-definition version of the Business Model Canvas can be downloaded here: http://www.businessmodelgeneration.com/canvas published by Creative Commons License (Date of access 16 July 2012).

  2. 2.

    Cmp. BVL Study of present Trends in Logistics 2008.

  3. 3.

    The trend-scenario bases on a workshop with experts from the freight transportation branch. Managers, external consultants as well as academics participated. Megatrends in logistics were discussed and built the foundation for the development of a CloudLogistic scenario.

  4. 4.

    Cmp. Study of BVL (2008).

  5. 5.

    Cmp. Study of BVL (2008).

  6. 6.

    Cmp. Study of BVL (2008).

  7. 7.

    The idea of Internet of things (IoT) relies on a vision of Kevin Ashton who was a co-founder and chief-officer of the auto-ID-center of the MIT in the late 1990s. He thought about a growing conflation of physical things and the digital world of the internet where things can act autonomously in a data-linked environment [20, p. 13].

References

  1. Building Federal Ministry of Transport and Urban Development. 2007. Prognose der deutschlandweiten Verkehrsverflechtung 2025. Technical report. München/Freiburg: Self-Published.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Helmreich, S., and H. Keller. 2003. FREIGHTVISION - Sustainable European freight transport 2050: Forecast, vision and policy recommendation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cruijssen, F., W. Dullaert, and H. Fleuren. 2007. Horizontal cooperation in transport and logistics. A literature review. Transportation Journal 46 (3): 22–39.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bloech, J., and G. B. Ihde. 1997. Vahlens groß es Logistiklexikon. München: Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tummel, C., C. Franzen, P. Friedrichsmeier, N. Voßen, P. Wolters, E. Hauck, and S. Jeschke. 2012. CloudLogistic – Line-Based Optimization for the Disposition of LTL Shipments. In Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Logistics (ISL 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tummel, C., C. Franzen, E. Hauck, and S. Jeschke. 2011. An Incremental Online Heuristic for Evaluating the Feasibility of the m-VRPTWAR. In Proceedings of The 3rd International Conference on Logistics and Transport & The 4th International Conference on Operations and Supply Chain Management, Malé, Maldives, 647–660.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rupp, C., and die SOPHISTen. 2007. Requirements-Engineering und -Management: professionelle, iterative Anforderungsanalyse für die Praxis, vol. 4. München, Wien: Carl Hanser.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sommerville, I. 2007. Software Engineering, vol. 8. München: Pearson Studium.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Osterwalder, A., and Y. Pigneur. 2009. Business model generation. Self-Published.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Spath, N. Weiner, T. Renner, and A. Weisbecker. 2012. Neue Geschäftsmodelle für die Cloud entwickeln: Methoden, Modelle und Erfahrungen für “Software-as-a-Service” im Unternehmen. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Friedrichsmeier, P., N. Voßen, C. Tummel, E. Hauck, and S. Jeschke. 2012. CloudLogistic – Geschäftsmodellentwicklung für eine Frachtenkooperation kleiner und mittlerer Straßengüterverkehrsunternehmen im Teilladungssegment. In Interdisziplinarität und Komplexität: Konferenz für Wirtschafts- und Sozialkybernetik vom 28. bis 29. Juni 2012 in Aachen, ed. S. Jeschke, T. Fischer, M. Tilebein, and M. Schwaninger. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Burmeister, K., A. Neef, and B. Beyers. 2004. Corporate Foresight: Unternehmen gestalten Zukunft. Hamburg: Murmann.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Z_punkt GmbH. 2008. Z_punkt Megatrends. Köln: Self-Published.

    Google Scholar 

  14. McKinnon, A. 2010. Environmental sustainability: A new priority for logistics managers. In Green logistics: Improving the environmental sustainability of logistics, ed. A. McKinnon, S. Cullinane, M. Browne, and A. Whiteing, 3–30. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bundesvereinigung Logistik BVL, ed. 2008. Studie Trends und Strategien in der Logistik 2008: Die Kernaussagen, 2008. URL. Accessed 15 Jul 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Geschka, H., and B. Winckler. 1990. Die Szenariotechnik, eine Grundlage der Strategieentwicklung von Unternehmen und des Staats. In Unternehmensstrategien im sozio-ökonomischen Wandel, ed. H. Czap, 75–88. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bretzke, W. R. 2010. Logistische Netzwerke. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. ten Hompel, M. 2008. Das Internet der Dinge. Produkte werden sich künftig ihren Weg vom Hersteller zum Kunden selber suchen. Maschinenmarkt Industrie 2008(10).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Atzori, L., A. Iera, and G. Morabito. 2010. The internet of things: A survey. Computer Networks, 54 (15): 2787–2805.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Brand, L., T. Hülser, V. Grimm, and A. Zweck. 2009. Internet der Dinge: Übersichtsstudie. Düsseldorf: VDI Technologiezentrum GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schuldt, A., K. A. Hribernik, J. D. Gehrke, K.-D. Thoben, and O. Herzog. 2010. Cloud computing for autonomous control in logistics. In INFORMATIK 2010: Service Science – Neue Perspektiven für die Informatik: Band 1, ed. K.-P. Fähnrich and B. Franczyk, 305–310. Bonn: Köllen.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Killich, S., and H. Luczak. 2003. Unternehmenskooperation für kleine und mittelständische Unternehmen. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Klaas-Wissing, T. and S. Albers. 2010. Cooperative versus corporate governance of LTL networks. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications: A Leading Journal of Supply Chain Management 13 (6): 493–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadine Voßen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Voßen, N., Friedrichsmeier, P., Hauck, E., Jeschke, S. (2014). Design and Development of a Business Model for Less Than Truck Load Freight Cooperation. In: Jeschke, S., Isenhardt, I., Hees, F., Henning, K. (eds) Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2013/2014. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08816-7_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics