Skip to main content

Abstract

Fuzzy measures or capacities are the most general representation of uncertainty functions. However, this general class has been little explored from the point of view of its information content, when degrees of uncertainty are not supposed to be numerical, and belong to a finite qualitative scale, except in the case of possibility or necessity measures. The thrust of the paper is to define an ordering relation on the set of qualitative capacities expressing the idea that one is more informative than another, in agreement with the possibilistic notion of relative specificity. To this aim, we show that the class of qualitative capacities can be partitioned into equivalence classes of functions containing the same amount of information. They only differ by the underlying epistemic attitude such as pessimism or optimism. A meaningful information ordering between capacities can be defined on the basis of the most pessimistic (resp. optimistic) representatives of their equivalence classes. It is shown that, while qualitative capacities bear strong similarities to belief functions, such an analogy can be misleading when it comes to information content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Assaghir, Z., Napoli, A., et al.: Numerical information fusion: lattice of answers with supporting arguments. In: Int. Conf. Tools for A.I., Boca Raton, pp. 621–628 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chateauneuf, A., Grabisch, M., Rico, A.: Modeling attitudes toward uncertainty through the use of Sugeno integral. J. Math. Economics 44, 1084–1099 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: A set-theoretic view of belief functions - Logical operations and approximation by fuzzy sets. Int. J. of General Systems 12(3), 193–226 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Qualitative possibility functions and integrals. In: Pap, E. (ed.) Handbook of Measure Theory, vol. 2, pp. 1469–1521. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Formal representations of uncertainty. In: Bouyssou, D., Dubois, D., Pirlot, M., Prade, H. (eds.) Decision-making Process- Concepts and Methods, ch. 3, pp. 85–156. ISTE London & Wiley (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dubois, D., Prade, H., Roubens, M., Sabbadin, R., Marichal, J.-L.: The use of the discrete Sugeno integral in decision-making: a survey. Int. J. of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 9(5), 539–561 (2001)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Dubois, D., Prade, H., Rico, A.: Qualitative capacities as imprecise possibilities. In: van der Gaag, L.C. (ed.) ECSQARU 2013. LNCS, vol. 7958, pp. 169–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubois, D., Prade, H., Sabbadin, R.: Decision theoretic foundations of qualitative possibility theory. European Journal of Operational Research 128, 459–478 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Grabisch, M.: On the representation of k-decomposable measures. In: Proc. 7th IFSA world Congress, Prague, vol. 1, pp. 478–483 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marichal, J.-L., Roubens, M.: Entropy of discrete fuzzy measures. Int. J. Uncert. Fuzziness, and Knowledge-Based Systems 8, 635–640 (2000)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Mesiar, R.: k-order pan-discrete fuzzy measures. In: Proc. 7th IFSA world Congress, Prague, vol. 1, pp. 488–490 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Prade, H., Rico, A.: Possibilistic evidence. In: Liu, W. (ed.) ECSQARU 2011. LNCS, vol. 6717, pp. 713–724. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Yager, R.R.: Entropy and specificity in a mathematical theory of evidence. International Journal of General Systems 9, 249–260 (1983)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Yager, R.R.: On the specificity of a possibility distribution. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 50, 279–292 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Yager, R.R.: Measures of assurance and opportunity in modeling uncertain information. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 27(8), 776–797 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dubois, D., Prade, H., Rico, A. (2014). On the Informational Comparison of Qualitative Fuzzy Measures. In: Laurent, A., Strauss, O., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R.R. (eds) Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems. IPMU 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 442. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08795-5_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08795-5_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08794-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08795-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics