Abstract
Internationally, “quality teaching” and its close relatives “authentic pedagogy” and “productive pedagogy” have been enthusiastically embraced by policy-makers in education. In Australia “quality teaching” has emerged as a central strategy for boosting the nation’s scholastic performance. This chapter argues that over the past six years State and Commonwealth education ministers have tended to focus quite selectively on research findings that speak to the positive outcomes associated with quality teaching, while neglecting the complexity of this field of research and the role that other factors (such as peer influences, parental involvement, or socio-geographical factors) may play. Drawing on findings from the author’s current research into student engagement in low socio-economic areas the chapter argues that the phenomenon of ‘residualisation’ in particular, whereby disadvantage is concentrated in certain public schools as a result of ‘school choice’, has quite powerful effects on the engagement and achievement of low SES students. Such evidence has, it is argued, been tacitly excluded from governments’ policy arguments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2011). Schools Australia (Catalogue 4221.0). Canberra: ABS.
Council of Australian Governments. (2008). Fact sheet: Smarter schools quality teaching national partnership. http://www.coag.gov.au/node/257
Council of Australian Governments. (2012). Review of national education agreement performance framework. http://www.coag.gov.au/node/440
Crosnoe, R., Cavanagh, S., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2003). Adolescent friendships as academic resources: The intersection of friendship, race, and school disadvantage. Sociological Perspectives, 46(3), 331–352.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. (2011). Review of funding for schooling: Final report. (Gonski report). Canberra: DEEWR.
Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 225–241.
Frank, K. A., Muller, C., Schiller, K. S., Riegle-Crumb, C., Mueller, A. S., Crosnoe, R., & Pearson, J. (2008). The social dynamics of mathematics coursetaking in high school. American Journal of Sociology, 113(6), 1645–1696.
Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
Ingvarson, L. (2011). Strengthening links between teacher pay and performance. ACER e-News. http://www.acer.wsu.au/enews/2011/05
Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2008). Estimating teacher impacts on student achievement: An experimental evaluation. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers, 14607. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Kim, T. E., Gendron, B., Toro, R. I., & Fairborn, S. K. (2011). Individual, peer, and school effects on math achievement and high school dropout. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 2(4), 256–260.
Kindermann, T. A. (2007). Effects of naturally existing peer groups on changes in engagement in a cohort of sixth graders. Child Development, 78(4), 1186–1203.
Koedel, C., & Betts, J. (2007). Re-examining the role of teacher quality in the educational production function. Department of Economics, University of Missouri, Working Papers 0708.
Lamb, S., Walstab, A., Teese, R., Vickers, M., & Rumberger, R. (2004). Staying on at school: Improving student retention in Australia. Queensland Department of Education and the Arts on behalf of the MCEETYA National Fund for Educational Research.
New South Wales Government, Minister for Education and Communities. (2012). Great teaching, inspired learning: Discussion paper. http://news.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/index.cfm.
Rosenfeld, L. B., Richman, J. M., & Bowen, G. L. (2000). Social support networks and school outcomes: The centrality of the teacher. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 17(3), 205–226.
Rothman, S. (2002). Achievement in literacy and numeracy by Australian 14-year olds, 1975–1998 (Longitudinal Surveys of Australian Youth Research Report No. 29). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Ryan, C., & Watson, L. (2004). The drift to private schools in Australia: Understanding its features. Canberra: Australian National University. http://cbe.anu.edu.au/research/papers/ceprdpapers/DP479.pdf
Thomson, S. (2011). Challenges for Australian education. Research Developments, 25(2). http://research.acer.edu.au
Vickers, M. H. (2004). Markets and mobilities: Dilemmas facing the comprehensive neighbourhood school. Melbourne Studies in Education, 45(2), 1–22.
Vinson, A., Esson, K., & Johnston, K. (2002). Inquiry into the Provision of Public Education in NSW. Report of the ‘Vinson Inquiry’. Sydney: New South Wales Teachers’ Federation and the Parents and Citizens Council.
Watson, L., & Ryan, C. (2010). Choosers and losers: The impact of government subsidies on Australian secondary schools. Australian Journal of Education, 54(1), 86–107.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vickers, M. (2015). Neglecting the Evidence: Are We Expecting Too Much from Quality Teaching?. In: Proctor, H., Brownlee, P., Freebody, P. (eds) Controversies in Education. Policy Implications of Research in Education, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08759-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08759-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08758-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08759-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)