Skip to main content

Exploring the Relationship between Partnership Model Participation and Interfirm Network Structure: An Analysis of the Office365 Ecosystem

  • Conference paper
Software Business. Towards Continuous Value Delivery (ICSOB 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 182))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Platform owners face complex decisions in managing an ecosystem of third-party application developers. Little is known about the effect platform governance has on the productivity, or degree of interaction, among complementors in the ecosystem. The presented study of the Microsoft Office365 ecosystem investigates the extent to which participation in the partnership model of Microsoft influences productivity and embeddedness of complementors by means of network analysis and statistical inference. Results show the Office365 ecosystem is populated by 550 complementors that developed 1204 applications and initiated 787 interfirm relationships. Statistical inference reveals that increased productivity and participation in the Microsoft Certified Partner Network coincide with increased embeddedness, implying retention of complementors results in more cohesive ecosystems. Yet, partnership model participation does not result in increasing productivity of complementors. Results presented in this paper provide increased understanding of the influence of partnership models on ecosystem structure, to the benefit of practitioners and academia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gawer, A.: Platform dynamics and strategies: From products to services. In: Gawer, A. (ed.) Platforms, Markets and Innovation, pp. 45–76. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Rochet, J.C., Tirole, J.: Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets. Journal of the European Economic Assosication 1(4), 990–1029 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S., Finkelstein, A.: Business Network Management as a Survival Strategy: A Tale of Two Software Ecosystems. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Software Ecosystems, pp. 34–48 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boudreau, K.J., Hagiu, A.: Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. In: Gawer, A. (ed.) Platforms, Markets and Innovation, pp. 163–191. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boudreau, K.J.: Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Access vs. Devolving Control. Management Science 56(10), 1849–1872 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu, F., Iansiti, M.: Entry into platform-based markets. Strategic Management Journal 33(1), 88–106 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Scott, J.: Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Inc., Gateshead (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hanneman, R.A., Riddle, M.: Introduction to social network methods. University of California, Riverside, CA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. van Angeren, J., Blijleven, V., Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S.: Complementor Embeddedness in Platform Ecosystems: The Case of Google Apps. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Digital EcoSystems and Technologies, pp. 37–42 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. West, J.: How Open is Open Enough? Melding Proprietary and Open Source Platform Strategies. Research Policy 32(7), 1259–1285 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gawer, A., Cusumano, M.A.: How companies become platform leaders. MIT Sloan Management Review 49(2), 28–35 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boudreau, K.J.: Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom? An Early Look at Large Numbers of Software App Developers and Patterns of Innovation. Organiation Science 23(5), 1409–1427 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Iansiti, M., Levien, R.: Strategy as Ecology. Harvard Business Review 82(3), 68–78 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. den Hartigh, E., Tol, M., Visscher, W.: The health measurement of a business ecosystem. In: Proceedings of the European Network on Chaos and Complexity Research and Management Practice Meeting (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. van Angeren, J., Kabbedijk, J., Jansen, S., Popp, K.M.: A Survey of Associate Models used within Large Software Ecosystems. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Software Ecosystems, pp. 27–39 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. van Angeren, J., Kabbedijk, J., Popp, K.M., Jansen, S.: Managing software ecosystems through partnering. In: Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S., Cusumano, M.A. (eds.) Software Ecosystems: Analyzing and Managing Business Networks in the Software Industry, pp. 85–102. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Iyer, B., Lee, C.H., Venkatraman, N.: Managing in a Small World Ecosystem: Some Lessons from the Software Sector. California Management Review 48(3), 28–47 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Basole, R.C.: Visualization of interfirm relations in a converging mobile ecosystem. Journal of Information Technology 24, 144–159 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schilling, M.A., Phelps, C.C.: Interfirm Collaboration in Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation. Management Science 53(7), 1113–1126 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Freeman, L.C.: Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1(3), 215–239 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of small world networks. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Burkard, C., Widjaja, T., Buxmann, P.: Software ecosystems. Business and Information Systems Engineering 4(1), 41–44 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gawer, A., Henderson, R.: Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: Evicdence from Intel. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 16(1), 1–34 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J., Lambiotte, R., Lefebvre, E.: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics 5(10) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

van Angeren, J., Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S. (2014). Exploring the Relationship between Partnership Model Participation and Interfirm Network Structure: An Analysis of the Office365 Ecosystem. In: Lassenius, C., Smolander, K. (eds) Software Business. Towards Continuous Value Delivery. ICSOB 2014. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 182. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08738-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08738-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08737-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08738-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics